书评:《重新联合:劳工改革如何修复、振兴和重新统一美国》,作者:大卫·马德兰

Q2 Arts and Humanities Labor Studies Journal Pub Date : 2021-09-01 DOI:10.1177/0160449X211039123
César F. Rosado Marzán
{"title":"书评:《重新联合:劳工改革如何修复、振兴和重新统一美国》,作者:大卫·马德兰","authors":"César F. Rosado Marzán","doi":"10.1177/0160449X211039123","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In the United States, we debate how to rebuild our unions, but most of our discussions focus on improving the enterprise-based system that we have had since 1935. We talk about simplifying the National Labor Relations Board union election process, limiting employer opposition to unions during election campaigns, and extending National Labor Relations Act coverage to independent contractors and domestic workers, among others. But broader-based bargaining is seldom discussed. David Madland’s new book Re-Union: How Bold Labor Reforms Can Repair, Revitalize, and Reunite the United States fills this void of silence in our public debates. Madland’s book helps the reader understand how myopic our policy discussions regarding labor revitalization have been by addressing how many countries around the world, including most European Union countries, have had some form of “extension” practice, be it via law, policy, or autonomous bargaining, where collective bargaining agreements have been spread to whole sectors. Countries might also have wage boards, many times tripartite, to set minimum wages for workers laboring in more precarious sectors of the economy. In this sense, Re-Union opens up our national conversation to experiences from other countries where policymakers and governments have been more successful than the United States in protecting workers and the middle class. Chapter 3 specifically describes the experiences of Canada, the United Kingdom, and Australia. We learn that these countries have embarked on U.S.-style enterprise bargaining schemes with disastrous effects. The United Kingdom and Australia have also experimented at times with broader-based bargaining, yielding better results. The lessons are clear for the United States: we should also experiment with broader-based bargaining. Madland argues that broader-based bargaining can be instituted in the United States through a combination of various policies. Perhaps the most important policy change would include legislative action for the government to extend collectively bargained contracts to specific sectors of the economy. Another policy change would deputize labor unions to provide services that benefit all workers, for example, “workforce training, co-enforcement, and benefits navigation” (p.122). By providing public goods such as those, American unions would mimic aspects of the so-called “Ghent systems” of Belgium, Denmark, Finland, and Sweden (p.24). Ghent systems provide robust Book Reviews","PeriodicalId":35267,"journal":{"name":"Labor Studies Journal","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Book Review: Re-Union: How Labor Reforms Can Repair, Revitalize, and Reunite the United States by David Madland\",\"authors\":\"César F. Rosado Marzán\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/0160449X211039123\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"In the United States, we debate how to rebuild our unions, but most of our discussions focus on improving the enterprise-based system that we have had since 1935. We talk about simplifying the National Labor Relations Board union election process, limiting employer opposition to unions during election campaigns, and extending National Labor Relations Act coverage to independent contractors and domestic workers, among others. But broader-based bargaining is seldom discussed. David Madland’s new book Re-Union: How Bold Labor Reforms Can Repair, Revitalize, and Reunite the United States fills this void of silence in our public debates. Madland’s book helps the reader understand how myopic our policy discussions regarding labor revitalization have been by addressing how many countries around the world, including most European Union countries, have had some form of “extension” practice, be it via law, policy, or autonomous bargaining, where collective bargaining agreements have been spread to whole sectors. Countries might also have wage boards, many times tripartite, to set minimum wages for workers laboring in more precarious sectors of the economy. In this sense, Re-Union opens up our national conversation to experiences from other countries where policymakers and governments have been more successful than the United States in protecting workers and the middle class. Chapter 3 specifically describes the experiences of Canada, the United Kingdom, and Australia. We learn that these countries have embarked on U.S.-style enterprise bargaining schemes with disastrous effects. The United Kingdom and Australia have also experimented at times with broader-based bargaining, yielding better results. The lessons are clear for the United States: we should also experiment with broader-based bargaining. Madland argues that broader-based bargaining can be instituted in the United States through a combination of various policies. Perhaps the most important policy change would include legislative action for the government to extend collectively bargained contracts to specific sectors of the economy. Another policy change would deputize labor unions to provide services that benefit all workers, for example, “workforce training, co-enforcement, and benefits navigation” (p.122). By providing public goods such as those, American unions would mimic aspects of the so-called “Ghent systems” of Belgium, Denmark, Finland, and Sweden (p.24). Ghent systems provide robust Book Reviews\",\"PeriodicalId\":35267,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Labor Studies Journal\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Labor Studies Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/0160449X211039123\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"Arts and Humanities\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Labor Studies Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/0160449X211039123","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Arts and Humanities","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在美国,我们讨论如何重建我们的工会,但我们的讨论大多集中在改进我们自1935年以来实行的以企业为基础的制度。我们讨论简化国家劳工关系委员会的工会选举程序,限制雇主在竞选期间反对工会,并将《国家劳工关系法》的覆盖范围扩大到独立承包商和家庭佣工等。但更广泛的讨价还价很少被讨论。大卫·马德兰的新书《重新团结:大胆的劳工改革如何修复、振兴和重新团结美国》填补了我们公共辩论中沉默的空白。Madland的书通过阐述世界上有多少国家,包括大多数欧盟国家,都有某种形式的“延伸”实践,无论是通过法律、政策还是自主谈判,集体谈判协议已经扩散到整个行业,帮助读者了解我们关于劳动振兴的政策讨论是多么短视。各国可能还会设立工资委员会(往往是三方委员会),为在更不稳定的经济部门工作的工人设定最低工资。从这个意义上说,《重新联合》开启了我们的全国性对话,借鉴了其他国家的经验,这些国家的政策制定者和政府在保护工人和中产阶级方面比美国更成功。第三章具体描述了加拿大、英国和澳大利亚的经验。我们了解到,这些国家已经开始了美国式的企业谈判方案,造成了灾难性的后果。英国和澳大利亚有时也尝试过更广泛的谈判,结果更好。美国从中得到的教训很清楚:我们也应该尝试更广泛的讨价还价。Madland认为,通过各种政策的结合,可以在美国建立更广泛的讨价还价。也许最重要的政策变化将包括政府采取立法行动,将集体谈判合同扩展到特定的经济部门。另一项政策改变将授权工会提供有益于所有工人的服务,例如“劳动力培训、联合执法和有益于导航”(临122)。通过提供诸如此类的公共产品,美国工会将模仿比利时、丹麦、芬兰和瑞典所谓的“根特制度”(临24)。根特系统提供强大的书评
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Book Review: Re-Union: How Labor Reforms Can Repair, Revitalize, and Reunite the United States by David Madland
In the United States, we debate how to rebuild our unions, but most of our discussions focus on improving the enterprise-based system that we have had since 1935. We talk about simplifying the National Labor Relations Board union election process, limiting employer opposition to unions during election campaigns, and extending National Labor Relations Act coverage to independent contractors and domestic workers, among others. But broader-based bargaining is seldom discussed. David Madland’s new book Re-Union: How Bold Labor Reforms Can Repair, Revitalize, and Reunite the United States fills this void of silence in our public debates. Madland’s book helps the reader understand how myopic our policy discussions regarding labor revitalization have been by addressing how many countries around the world, including most European Union countries, have had some form of “extension” practice, be it via law, policy, or autonomous bargaining, where collective bargaining agreements have been spread to whole sectors. Countries might also have wage boards, many times tripartite, to set minimum wages for workers laboring in more precarious sectors of the economy. In this sense, Re-Union opens up our national conversation to experiences from other countries where policymakers and governments have been more successful than the United States in protecting workers and the middle class. Chapter 3 specifically describes the experiences of Canada, the United Kingdom, and Australia. We learn that these countries have embarked on U.S.-style enterprise bargaining schemes with disastrous effects. The United Kingdom and Australia have also experimented at times with broader-based bargaining, yielding better results. The lessons are clear for the United States: we should also experiment with broader-based bargaining. Madland argues that broader-based bargaining can be instituted in the United States through a combination of various policies. Perhaps the most important policy change would include legislative action for the government to extend collectively bargained contracts to specific sectors of the economy. Another policy change would deputize labor unions to provide services that benefit all workers, for example, “workforce training, co-enforcement, and benefits navigation” (p.122). By providing public goods such as those, American unions would mimic aspects of the so-called “Ghent systems” of Belgium, Denmark, Finland, and Sweden (p.24). Ghent systems provide robust Book Reviews
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Labor Studies Journal
Labor Studies Journal Social Sciences-Sociology and Political Science
CiteScore
1.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
26
期刊介绍: The Labor Studies Journal is the official journal of the United Association for Labor Education and is a multi-disciplinary journal publishing research on work, workers, labor organizations, and labor studies and worker education in the US and internationally. The Journal is interested in manuscripts using a diversity of research methods, both qualitative and quantitative, directed at a general audience including union, university, and community based labor educators, labor activists and scholars from across the social sciences and humanities. As a multi-disciplinary journal, manuscripts should be directed at a general audience, and care should be taken to make methods, especially highly quantitative ones, accessible to a general reader.
期刊最新文献
Analyzing the Benefits and Limitations of Non-Degree Credentials: The Case of Apprenticeship in Oregon The Potential and Limits of Spontaneous Labor Activism on Social Media: The Search for Justice among Chinese Restaurant Workers Book Review: The Hammer: Power, Inequality, and the Struggle for the Soul of Labor by Nolan, Hamilton Book Review: Our Veterans: Winners, Losers, Friends and Enemies on the New Terrain of Veterans Affairs by Gordon, Suzanne, Steve Early and Jasper Craven Opening the Ballot Box: Examining the Union Voting Behavior of Scholarship Football Players
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1