记者还是证人?

Gazette Pub Date : 2005-04-01 DOI:10.1177/0016549205050127
Robert L. Spellman
{"title":"记者还是证人?","authors":"Robert L. Spellman","doi":"10.1177/0016549205050127","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Jonathan Randal, who covered the Balkan Wars for The Washington Post, was subpoenaed to testify before the International Criminal Tribunal for the Former Yugoslavia. He challenged the subpoena. The Tribunal Appeals Chamber ruled that war correspondents have a qualified privilege to refuse to testify before the tribunal. The court held that it must balance the interest in free flow of information from war zones against the interest in the fair administration of justice. This article argues that the Appeals Chamber holding was deficient because it omitted the safety of the correspondent, his family and his sources from the equation. The American case of Robert Young Pelton, who interviewed John Walker Lindh in Afghanistan for Cable News Network (CNN), is also reviewed.","PeriodicalId":84790,"journal":{"name":"Gazette","volume":"67 1","pages":"123 - 139"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2005-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1177/0016549205050127","citationCount":"3","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Journalist or Witness?\",\"authors\":\"Robert L. Spellman\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/0016549205050127\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Jonathan Randal, who covered the Balkan Wars for The Washington Post, was subpoenaed to testify before the International Criminal Tribunal for the Former Yugoslavia. He challenged the subpoena. The Tribunal Appeals Chamber ruled that war correspondents have a qualified privilege to refuse to testify before the tribunal. The court held that it must balance the interest in free flow of information from war zones against the interest in the fair administration of justice. This article argues that the Appeals Chamber holding was deficient because it omitted the safety of the correspondent, his family and his sources from the equation. The American case of Robert Young Pelton, who interviewed John Walker Lindh in Afghanistan for Cable News Network (CNN), is also reviewed.\",\"PeriodicalId\":84790,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Gazette\",\"volume\":\"67 1\",\"pages\":\"123 - 139\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2005-04-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1177/0016549205050127\",\"citationCount\":\"3\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Gazette\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/0016549205050127\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Gazette","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/0016549205050127","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

摘要

为《华盛顿邮报》报道巴尔干战争的乔纳森·兰德尔(Jonathan Randal)被传唤到前南斯拉夫问题国际刑事法庭作证。他对传票提出异议。法庭上诉分庭裁定战地记者有权拒绝在法庭作证。法院认为,它必须在信息从战区自由流动的利益与公平司法的利益之间取得平衡。该条争辩说,上诉分庭的裁定有不足之处,因为它从等式中忽略了通讯员、其家人和其来源的安全。美国的罗伯特·杨·佩尔顿(Robert Young Pelton)在阿富汗为有线电视新闻网(CNN)采访约翰·沃克·林德(John Walker Lindh)的案件也被审查。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Journalist or Witness?
Jonathan Randal, who covered the Balkan Wars for The Washington Post, was subpoenaed to testify before the International Criminal Tribunal for the Former Yugoslavia. He challenged the subpoena. The Tribunal Appeals Chamber ruled that war correspondents have a qualified privilege to refuse to testify before the tribunal. The court held that it must balance the interest in free flow of information from war zones against the interest in the fair administration of justice. This article argues that the Appeals Chamber holding was deficient because it omitted the safety of the correspondent, his family and his sources from the equation. The American case of Robert Young Pelton, who interviewed John Walker Lindh in Afghanistan for Cable News Network (CNN), is also reviewed.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Communication Research and Political Commitment Communication Studies in Europe Kurt Baschwitz and the Founding Of Gazette Condoleezza’s in the (White) House, But the Game Goes on Communication and the Study of Personal Well-Being
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1