干扰素对细菌和病毒感染的反应

E. Pietras, Supriya K. Saha, Genhong Cheng
{"title":"干扰素对细菌和病毒感染的反应","authors":"E. Pietras, Supriya K. Saha, Genhong Cheng","doi":"10.1177/09680519060120040601","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Type I interferons (IFNs) were first described several decades ago as soluble factors that were capable of `interfering' with viral replication when added to infected cells. Type I IFNs have been shown to be induced by recognition of viral DNA and RNA via three distinct pathways: (i) a TRIFdependent pathway in macrophages via TLRs 3 and 4; (ii) a MyD88-dependent pathway in plasmacytoid dendritic cells (pDCs) via TLRs 7/8 and 9; and (iii) an intracellular recognition pathway utilizing the cytoplasmic receptors RIG-I/MDA5. Interestingly, these viral recognition pathways converge on TRAF3, which induces interferon through the activation of IRF3 or IRF7 by the TBK-1 and IKKi complexes. While type I IFN has been traditionally associated with antiviral responses, recent studies have demonstrated that many bacteria also induce type I interferon responses. The mechanisms of type I IFN induction and its role in host defense, however, are largely unclear. Studies with the Gram-positive intracellular bacterium Listeria monocytogenes indicated that it may trigger type I IFN induction through novel TLR-independent intracellular receptors and type I IFN may play a detrimental role to host response against listerial infection. In this article, we summarize some of these findings and discuss the functional differences of type I IFNs in bacterial and viral infections.","PeriodicalId":80292,"journal":{"name":"Journal of endotoxin research","volume":"12 1","pages":"246 - 250"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2006-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1177/09680519060120040601","citationCount":"42","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The interferon response to bacterial and viral infections\",\"authors\":\"E. Pietras, Supriya K. Saha, Genhong Cheng\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/09680519060120040601\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Type I interferons (IFNs) were first described several decades ago as soluble factors that were capable of `interfering' with viral replication when added to infected cells. Type I IFNs have been shown to be induced by recognition of viral DNA and RNA via three distinct pathways: (i) a TRIFdependent pathway in macrophages via TLRs 3 and 4; (ii) a MyD88-dependent pathway in plasmacytoid dendritic cells (pDCs) via TLRs 7/8 and 9; and (iii) an intracellular recognition pathway utilizing the cytoplasmic receptors RIG-I/MDA5. Interestingly, these viral recognition pathways converge on TRAF3, which induces interferon through the activation of IRF3 or IRF7 by the TBK-1 and IKKi complexes. While type I IFN has been traditionally associated with antiviral responses, recent studies have demonstrated that many bacteria also induce type I interferon responses. The mechanisms of type I IFN induction and its role in host defense, however, are largely unclear. Studies with the Gram-positive intracellular bacterium Listeria monocytogenes indicated that it may trigger type I IFN induction through novel TLR-independent intracellular receptors and type I IFN may play a detrimental role to host response against listerial infection. In this article, we summarize some of these findings and discuss the functional differences of type I IFNs in bacterial and viral infections.\",\"PeriodicalId\":80292,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of endotoxin research\",\"volume\":\"12 1\",\"pages\":\"246 - 250\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2006-08-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1177/09680519060120040601\",\"citationCount\":\"42\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of endotoxin research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/09680519060120040601\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of endotoxin research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/09680519060120040601","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 42

摘要

I型干扰素(ifn)在几十年前首次被描述为可溶性因子,当添加到受感染的细胞中时,能够“干扰”病毒复制。I型ifn已被证明是通过三种不同的途径被病毒DNA和RNA识别诱导的:(I)巨噬细胞中通过TLRs 3和4的trf依赖性途径;(ii)浆细胞样树突状细胞(pDCs)中myd88依赖通路通过TLRs 7/8和9;(iii)利用细胞质受体RIG-I/MDA5的细胞内识别途径。有趣的是,这些病毒识别途径汇聚在TRAF3上,TRAF3通过TBK-1和IKKi复合物激活IRF3或IRF7诱导干扰素。虽然I型干扰素传统上与抗病毒反应有关,但最近的研究表明,许多细菌也会诱导I型干扰素反应。然而,I型IFN诱导的机制及其在宿主防御中的作用在很大程度上尚不清楚。对革兰氏阳性细胞内单核增生李斯特菌的研究表明,它可能通过新的不依赖tlr的细胞内受体触发I型IFN诱导,I型IFN可能对宿主对李斯特菌感染的反应起不利作用。在本文中,我们总结了这些发现,并讨论了I型ifn在细菌和病毒感染中的功能差异。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
The interferon response to bacterial and viral infections
Type I interferons (IFNs) were first described several decades ago as soluble factors that were capable of `interfering' with viral replication when added to infected cells. Type I IFNs have been shown to be induced by recognition of viral DNA and RNA via three distinct pathways: (i) a TRIFdependent pathway in macrophages via TLRs 3 and 4; (ii) a MyD88-dependent pathway in plasmacytoid dendritic cells (pDCs) via TLRs 7/8 and 9; and (iii) an intracellular recognition pathway utilizing the cytoplasmic receptors RIG-I/MDA5. Interestingly, these viral recognition pathways converge on TRAF3, which induces interferon through the activation of IRF3 or IRF7 by the TBK-1 and IKKi complexes. While type I IFN has been traditionally associated with antiviral responses, recent studies have demonstrated that many bacteria also induce type I interferon responses. The mechanisms of type I IFN induction and its role in host defense, however, are largely unclear. Studies with the Gram-positive intracellular bacterium Listeria monocytogenes indicated that it may trigger type I IFN induction through novel TLR-independent intracellular receptors and type I IFN may play a detrimental role to host response against listerial infection. In this article, we summarize some of these findings and discuss the functional differences of type I IFNs in bacterial and viral infections.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Oral Lichenoid Reaction: An Uncommon Side Effect of Rituximab. The Common R71H-G230A-R293Q Human TMEM173 Is a Null Allele. Goodbye MANEY, Hello SAGE Hematological indices, inflammatory markers and neutrophil CD64 expression: comparative trends during experimental human endotoxemia. Investigation of the chemical structure and biological activity of oligosaccharides isolated from rough-type Xanthomonas campestris pv. campestris B100 lipopolysaccharide.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1