两种纵向数据分析框架的比较

IF 3.9 1区 数学 Q1 STATISTICS & PROBABILITY Statistical Science Pub Date : 2021-01-01 DOI:10.1214/20-sts813
Jie Zhou, Xiao Zhou, Liuquan Sun
{"title":"两种纵向数据分析框架的比较","authors":"Jie Zhou, Xiao Zhou, Liuquan Sun","doi":"10.1214/20-sts813","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Under the random design of longitudinal data, observation times are irregular, and there are mainly two frameworks for analyzing such kind of longitudinal data. One is the clustered data framework and the other is the counting process framework. In this paper, we give a thorough comparison of these two frameworks in terms of data structure, model assumptions and estimation procedures. We find that modeling the observation times in the counting process framework will not gain any efficiency when the observation times are correlated with covariates but independent of the longitudinal response given covariates. Some simulation studies are conducted to compare the finite sample behaviors of the related estimators, and a real data analysis of the Alzheimer’s disease study is implemented for further comparison.","PeriodicalId":51172,"journal":{"name":"Statistical Science","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.9000,"publicationDate":"2021-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparison of Two Frameworks for Analyzing Longitudinal Data\",\"authors\":\"Jie Zhou, Xiao Zhou, Liuquan Sun\",\"doi\":\"10.1214/20-sts813\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Under the random design of longitudinal data, observation times are irregular, and there are mainly two frameworks for analyzing such kind of longitudinal data. One is the clustered data framework and the other is the counting process framework. In this paper, we give a thorough comparison of these two frameworks in terms of data structure, model assumptions and estimation procedures. We find that modeling the observation times in the counting process framework will not gain any efficiency when the observation times are correlated with covariates but independent of the longitudinal response given covariates. Some simulation studies are conducted to compare the finite sample behaviors of the related estimators, and a real data analysis of the Alzheimer’s disease study is implemented for further comparison.\",\"PeriodicalId\":51172,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Statistical Science\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Statistical Science\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"100\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1214/20-sts813\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"数学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"STATISTICS & PROBABILITY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Statistical Science","FirstCategoryId":"100","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1214/20-sts813","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"数学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"STATISTICS & PROBABILITY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在纵向数据随机设计下,观测时间是不规则的,分析这类纵向数据主要有两种框架。一种是聚类数据框架,另一种是计数过程框架。在本文中,我们在数据结构、模型假设和估计过程方面对这两种框架进行了全面的比较。我们发现,当观测次数与协变量相关而与给定协变量的纵向响应无关时,在计数过程框架中对观测次数建模将不会获得任何效率。进行了仿真研究,比较了相关估计器的有限样本行为,并对阿尔茨海默病研究的真实数据进行了分析,进一步进行了比较。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Comparison of Two Frameworks for Analyzing Longitudinal Data
Under the random design of longitudinal data, observation times are irregular, and there are mainly two frameworks for analyzing such kind of longitudinal data. One is the clustered data framework and the other is the counting process framework. In this paper, we give a thorough comparison of these two frameworks in terms of data structure, model assumptions and estimation procedures. We find that modeling the observation times in the counting process framework will not gain any efficiency when the observation times are correlated with covariates but independent of the longitudinal response given covariates. Some simulation studies are conducted to compare the finite sample behaviors of the related estimators, and a real data analysis of the Alzheimer’s disease study is implemented for further comparison.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Statistical Science
Statistical Science 数学-统计学与概率论
CiteScore
6.50
自引率
1.80%
发文量
40
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: The central purpose of Statistical Science is to convey the richness, breadth and unity of the field by presenting the full range of contemporary statistical thought at a moderate technical level, accessible to the wide community of practitioners, researchers and students of statistics and probability.
期刊最新文献
Comment: Response-Adaptive Randomization in Clinical Trials: From Myths to Practical Considerations Data, Science, and Global Disasters Confidence as Likelihood Comparison of Two Frameworks for Analyzing Longitudinal Data Discussion of “On Nearly Assumption-Free Tests of Nominal Confidence Interval Coverage for Causal Parameters Estimated by Machine Learning”
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1