{"title":"真与假的不可区分的区别。梅洛-庞蒂文学课程中的语言问题","authors":"J. Roux","doi":"10.13130/2240-9599/7964","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Criticizing linguistic idealism, Merleau-Ponty conceives the linguistic domaine through the prism of speech. The paper analyses the way in which Merleau-Ponty, in his courses concerning literature in the first half of the fifties, raises the issue of the emergence of ideality through the linguistic act, and what he proposes, in dialogue with Paul Val e ry, to settle it.","PeriodicalId":53793,"journal":{"name":"Lebenswelt-Aesthetics and Philosophy of Experience","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2016-12-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"L’inassignable différence du vrai et du faux. Le problème du langage dans les cours de Merleau-Ponty sur la littérature\",\"authors\":\"J. Roux\",\"doi\":\"10.13130/2240-9599/7964\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Criticizing linguistic idealism, Merleau-Ponty conceives the linguistic domaine through the prism of speech. The paper analyses the way in which Merleau-Ponty, in his courses concerning literature in the first half of the fifties, raises the issue of the emergence of ideality through the linguistic act, and what he proposes, in dialogue with Paul Val e ry, to settle it.\",\"PeriodicalId\":53793,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Lebenswelt-Aesthetics and Philosophy of Experience\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2016-12-31\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Lebenswelt-Aesthetics and Philosophy of Experience\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.13130/2240-9599/7964\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"PHILOSOPHY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Lebenswelt-Aesthetics and Philosophy of Experience","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.13130/2240-9599/7964","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"PHILOSOPHY","Score":null,"Total":0}
L’inassignable différence du vrai et du faux. Le problème du langage dans les cours de Merleau-Ponty sur la littérature
Criticizing linguistic idealism, Merleau-Ponty conceives the linguistic domaine through the prism of speech. The paper analyses the way in which Merleau-Ponty, in his courses concerning literature in the first half of the fifties, raises the issue of the emergence of ideality through the linguistic act, and what he proposes, in dialogue with Paul Val e ry, to settle it.