重读21世纪的伊本-赫勒敦:旅行理论与现代阿拉伯世界的权威、合法性和国家暴力问题

IF 0.3 Q3 AREA STUDIES Arab Studies Quarterly Pub Date : 2021-01-01 DOI:10.13169/ARABSTUDQUAR.43.2.0146
Ahmed Abozeid
{"title":"重读21世纪的伊本-赫勒敦:旅行理论与现代阿拉伯世界的权威、合法性和国家暴力问题","authors":"Ahmed Abozeid","doi":"10.13169/ARABSTUDQUAR.43.2.0146","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":": To illuminate the complicated relationship between the authorities and society in the contemporary Arab world, this paper draws on Ibn Khaldun’s propositions. By applying edward Said’s notion of traveling theory, it traces, interrogates, and evaluates ways in which multiple readings of Ibn Khaldun’s theory have been (re)formulated, transplanted, and circulated by other authors, and how these theories traveled from an earlier point to another time and place where they come into new prominence. furthermore, it examines how three contemporary Arab thinkers (Abid Al-Jabri, Abdullah Laroui, and nazih Ayubi) addressed and interpreted the heritage of Ibn Khaldun and his theory on state formation and authority constitutive in the Arab Islamic world (particularly the Sunni world). The paper concludes that, in comparison with Said’s “traveling theory” intentions, the three modern Arabic readings of Ibn Khaldun’s theory were not traveling as much as it was attempting to uproot, distort, suffocate, and even bury Ibn Khaldun’s original theory, as well as obliterate and culturally appropriate the features of the original theory, and portray it as the opposite of progress and modernization, in favor of enhancing the dominance of Western epistemology.","PeriodicalId":44343,"journal":{"name":"Arab Studies Quarterly","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.3000,"publicationDate":"2021-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Re-reading Ibn-Khaldun in the 21st Century: Traveling Theory and the Question of Authority, Legitimacy, and State Violence in the Modern Arab World\",\"authors\":\"Ahmed Abozeid\",\"doi\":\"10.13169/ARABSTUDQUAR.43.2.0146\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\": To illuminate the complicated relationship between the authorities and society in the contemporary Arab world, this paper draws on Ibn Khaldun’s propositions. By applying edward Said’s notion of traveling theory, it traces, interrogates, and evaluates ways in which multiple readings of Ibn Khaldun’s theory have been (re)formulated, transplanted, and circulated by other authors, and how these theories traveled from an earlier point to another time and place where they come into new prominence. furthermore, it examines how three contemporary Arab thinkers (Abid Al-Jabri, Abdullah Laroui, and nazih Ayubi) addressed and interpreted the heritage of Ibn Khaldun and his theory on state formation and authority constitutive in the Arab Islamic world (particularly the Sunni world). The paper concludes that, in comparison with Said’s “traveling theory” intentions, the three modern Arabic readings of Ibn Khaldun’s theory were not traveling as much as it was attempting to uproot, distort, suffocate, and even bury Ibn Khaldun’s original theory, as well as obliterate and culturally appropriate the features of the original theory, and portray it as the opposite of progress and modernization, in favor of enhancing the dominance of Western epistemology.\",\"PeriodicalId\":44343,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Arab Studies Quarterly\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Arab Studies Quarterly\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.13169/ARABSTUDQUAR.43.2.0146\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"AREA STUDIES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Arab Studies Quarterly","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.13169/ARABSTUDQUAR.43.2.0146","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"AREA STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

为了阐明当代阿拉伯世界当局与社会之间的复杂关系,本文借鉴了伊本·赫勒敦的主张。通过运用爱德华·赛义德的旅行理论的概念,它追溯、询问和评估了伊本·赫勒敦理论的多种解读被其他作者(重新)表述、移植和传播的方式,以及这些理论如何从早期的一点传播到另一个时间和地点,并在那里获得了新的突出地位。此外,它还考察了三位当代阿拉伯思想家(Abid Al-Jabri, Abdullah Laroui和nazih Ayubi)如何阐述和解释伊本·赫勒敦的遗产以及他关于阿拉伯伊斯兰世界(特别是逊尼派世界)国家形成和权威构成的理论。本文的结论是,与赛义德的“旅行论”意图相比,伊本·赫勒敦理论的三种现代阿拉伯语解读与其说是旅行,不如说是试图将伊本·赫勒敦的原始理论连根拔起、扭曲、窒息,甚至埋葬,抹杀和文化上占有原始理论的特征,将其描绘成进步和现代化的对立面,有利于加强西方认识论的主导地位。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Re-reading Ibn-Khaldun in the 21st Century: Traveling Theory and the Question of Authority, Legitimacy, and State Violence in the Modern Arab World
: To illuminate the complicated relationship between the authorities and society in the contemporary Arab world, this paper draws on Ibn Khaldun’s propositions. By applying edward Said’s notion of traveling theory, it traces, interrogates, and evaluates ways in which multiple readings of Ibn Khaldun’s theory have been (re)formulated, transplanted, and circulated by other authors, and how these theories traveled from an earlier point to another time and place where they come into new prominence. furthermore, it examines how three contemporary Arab thinkers (Abid Al-Jabri, Abdullah Laroui, and nazih Ayubi) addressed and interpreted the heritage of Ibn Khaldun and his theory on state formation and authority constitutive in the Arab Islamic world (particularly the Sunni world). The paper concludes that, in comparison with Said’s “traveling theory” intentions, the three modern Arabic readings of Ibn Khaldun’s theory were not traveling as much as it was attempting to uproot, distort, suffocate, and even bury Ibn Khaldun’s original theory, as well as obliterate and culturally appropriate the features of the original theory, and portray it as the opposite of progress and modernization, in favor of enhancing the dominance of Western epistemology.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Arab Studies Quarterly
Arab Studies Quarterly AREA STUDIES-
CiteScore
0.80
自引率
33.30%
发文量
7
期刊最新文献
Black Day – Palestine Germany’s Never-Ending Guilt Trip Exile Songwriters of the Palestinian Revolution (and the Problem with Sugar Man) The Rise and Fall of Postcolonial Charisma Amr Goes to Hollywood
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1