关于《都柏林失落者年鉴》的一些观察

Q1 Arts and Humanities Eriu Pub Date : 2022-01-01 DOI:10.1353/eri.2007.0005
Meidhbhín Ní Úrdail
{"title":"关于《都柏林失落者年鉴》的一些观察","authors":"Meidhbhín Ní Úrdail","doi":"10.1353/eri.2007.0005","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract:This article examines the compilation and transcription of the eighteenth-century source commonly known as the 'Dublin Annals of Inisfallen'. It reviews, in particular, the work's most substantial entries, i.e. those which concern the O'Briens and the history of Thomond in the medieval period, and briefly highlights the historical value of other longer entries relating to the twelfth, thirteenth and fourteenth centuries. The 'Dublin Annals' attests to the readiness with which scribes indulged in editorial intrusion, while it also offers insights into the factors which impinged upon textual transmission in the Modern Irish period.","PeriodicalId":38655,"journal":{"name":"Eriu","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"SOME OBSERVATIONS ON THE 'DUBLIN ANNALS OF INISFALLEN'\",\"authors\":\"Meidhbhín Ní Úrdail\",\"doi\":\"10.1353/eri.2007.0005\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract:This article examines the compilation and transcription of the eighteenth-century source commonly known as the 'Dublin Annals of Inisfallen'. It reviews, in particular, the work's most substantial entries, i.e. those which concern the O'Briens and the history of Thomond in the medieval period, and briefly highlights the historical value of other longer entries relating to the twelfth, thirteenth and fourteenth centuries. The 'Dublin Annals' attests to the readiness with which scribes indulged in editorial intrusion, while it also offers insights into the factors which impinged upon textual transmission in the Modern Irish period.\",\"PeriodicalId\":38655,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Eriu\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Eriu\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1353/eri.2007.0005\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"Arts and Humanities\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Eriu","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1353/eri.2007.0005","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Arts and Humanities","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

摘要:本文考察了18世纪的“都柏林Inisfallen编年史”的编纂和抄写。它特别回顾了作品中最重要的条目,即那些涉及奥布莱恩夫妇和中世纪时期托马斯历史的条目,并简要地强调了与第十二、十三和十四世纪有关的其他较长的条目的历史价值。《都柏林编年史》证明了抄写员乐于介入编辑,同时它也提供了对影响现代爱尔兰时期文本传播的因素的见解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
SOME OBSERVATIONS ON THE 'DUBLIN ANNALS OF INISFALLEN'
Abstract:This article examines the compilation and transcription of the eighteenth-century source commonly known as the 'Dublin Annals of Inisfallen'. It reviews, in particular, the work's most substantial entries, i.e. those which concern the O'Briens and the history of Thomond in the medieval period, and briefly highlights the historical value of other longer entries relating to the twelfth, thirteenth and fourteenth centuries. The 'Dublin Annals' attests to the readiness with which scribes indulged in editorial intrusion, while it also offers insights into the factors which impinged upon textual transmission in the Modern Irish period.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Eriu
Eriu Arts and Humanities-Literature and Literary Theory
CiteScore
0.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
5
期刊最新文献
Dislighe luirg Old Irish Námae 'Enemy' and the Celtic NT-Stems Imtheachta Aeniasa’s lúirecha re-visited Paradigm Splits and Hiatus Forms: The Origins of Modern Irish Sceach and Scottish Gaelic Sgitheach 'Thorn Tree', and the Old Irish Precursor of Scottish Gaelic Dìthean 'Flower' Gofraidh Óg Mac An Bhaird Cecinit: 7. Treóin An Cheannais Clann Dálaigh
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1