纳博科夫与契诃夫的对话:没有狗的女人

IF 0.1 N/A HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY Anuari de Filologia-Llengues i Literaturas Modernas Pub Date : 2011-12-30 DOI:10.1344/AFLM2011.1.3
Kirsten Rutsala
{"title":"纳博科夫与契诃夫的对话:没有狗的女人","authors":"Kirsten Rutsala","doi":"10.1344/AFLM2011.1.3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Although Nabokov's admiration for Chekhov's work is well-documented, relatively little critical attention has been paid to the connections between the two writers' works. This article concentrates on two of Nabokov’s stories as part of his larger dialogue with Chekhov. \"The Reunion\" is analyzed in conjunction with Chekhov’s story ‚The Lady with the Little Dog,‛ focusing on the theme of deception in both stories, particularly the notion of secret, double lives. The analysis also includes an examination of the stories’ structural similarities, including the continual overturning of both characters’ and readers’ expectations. The expected endings do not occur in either story, and the ultimate conclusions are open-ended and ambiguous. While \"The Reunion\" is a relatively straightforward story, \"That in Aleppo Once. . . \" is considerably more complex. Nabokov deliberately complicates matters by creating both an unreliable narrator and a second character (the narrator’s wife) who invents stories about her experiences. Thus Nabokov takes Chekhov’s ambiguity a step further: not only is the future of the characters uncertain, the past is as well. The Chekhovian subtext appears throughout the story, and it turns out that the story is a reversal or subversion of Chekhovian details and devices. Perhaps most striking are the authors’ respective treatments of their heroines. While Chekhov creates a character in Anna Sergeyevna who at first appears to be a literary type and then transforms her into a complex individual, Nabokov reverses this course. The narrator’s wife continually evades his and the reader’s understanding; the more we seem to learn about her, the less we really know. Finally, the narrator declares that his wife never existed at all, that she is simply \"a phantom\" who exists only on the page. From a metaliterary angle, of course, this is entirely accurate, since she is a fictional character. Thus Nabokov’s story simultaneously pays tribute to Chekhov and lays bare the mechanics of storytelling, narrative decisions, and the creative process itself.","PeriodicalId":53720,"journal":{"name":"Anuari de Filologia-Llengues i Literaturas Modernas","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2011-12-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Nabokov's dialogue with Chekhov: Ladies with an without dogs\",\"authors\":\"Kirsten Rutsala\",\"doi\":\"10.1344/AFLM2011.1.3\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Although Nabokov's admiration for Chekhov's work is well-documented, relatively little critical attention has been paid to the connections between the two writers' works. This article concentrates on two of Nabokov’s stories as part of his larger dialogue with Chekhov. \\\"The Reunion\\\" is analyzed in conjunction with Chekhov’s story ‚The Lady with the Little Dog,‛ focusing on the theme of deception in both stories, particularly the notion of secret, double lives. The analysis also includes an examination of the stories’ structural similarities, including the continual overturning of both characters’ and readers’ expectations. The expected endings do not occur in either story, and the ultimate conclusions are open-ended and ambiguous. While \\\"The Reunion\\\" is a relatively straightforward story, \\\"That in Aleppo Once. . . \\\" is considerably more complex. Nabokov deliberately complicates matters by creating both an unreliable narrator and a second character (the narrator’s wife) who invents stories about her experiences. Thus Nabokov takes Chekhov’s ambiguity a step further: not only is the future of the characters uncertain, the past is as well. The Chekhovian subtext appears throughout the story, and it turns out that the story is a reversal or subversion of Chekhovian details and devices. Perhaps most striking are the authors’ respective treatments of their heroines. While Chekhov creates a character in Anna Sergeyevna who at first appears to be a literary type and then transforms her into a complex individual, Nabokov reverses this course. The narrator’s wife continually evades his and the reader’s understanding; the more we seem to learn about her, the less we really know. Finally, the narrator declares that his wife never existed at all, that she is simply \\\"a phantom\\\" who exists only on the page. From a metaliterary angle, of course, this is entirely accurate, since she is a fictional character. Thus Nabokov’s story simultaneously pays tribute to Chekhov and lays bare the mechanics of storytelling, narrative decisions, and the creative process itself.\",\"PeriodicalId\":53720,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Anuari de Filologia-Llengues i Literaturas Modernas\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2011-12-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Anuari de Filologia-Llengues i Literaturas Modernas\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1344/AFLM2011.1.3\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"N/A\",\"JCRName\":\"HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Anuari de Filologia-Llengues i Literaturas Modernas","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1344/AFLM2011.1.3","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"N/A","JCRName":"HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

尽管纳博科夫对契诃夫作品的赞赏有据可查,但对于这两位作家作品之间的联系,评论界的关注相对较少。这篇文章集中于纳博科夫的两个故事,作为他与契诃夫更大对话的一部分。《团聚》与契诃夫的小说《抱小狗的女士》(The Lady with The Little Dog)结合在一起进行分析,重点关注两个故事中的欺骗主题,尤其是秘密、双重生活的概念。分析还包括对故事结构相似性的检查,包括不断推翻角色和读者的期望。预期的结局在两个故事中都没有出现,最终的结论是开放式的,模棱两可的。虽然“团聚”是一个相对简单的故事,“在阿勒颇曾经……”要复杂得多。纳博科夫故意创造了一个不可靠的叙述者和另一个虚构自己经历的角色(叙述者的妻子),使事情变得复杂。因此,纳博科夫将契诃夫的模棱两可更进一步:不仅人物的未来不确定,他们的过去也不确定。契诃夫式的潜台词贯穿整个故事,事实证明,这个故事是对契诃夫式的细节和手法的逆转或颠覆。也许最引人注目的是作者各自对女主角的处理。契诃夫在安娜·谢尔盖耶夫娜身上创造了一个角色,她起初似乎是一个文学类型的人,然后把她变成了一个复杂的个体,而纳博科夫则颠倒了这一过程。叙述者的妻子不断地逃避他和读者的理解;我们对她了解得越多,我们真正了解的就越少。最后,叙述者宣称他的妻子根本不存在,她只是一个只存在于书页上的“幽灵”。当然,从文学的角度来看,这是完全准确的,因为她是一个虚构的人物。因此,纳博科夫的故事在向契诃夫致敬的同时,也揭示了讲故事、叙事决策和创作过程本身的机制。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Nabokov's dialogue with Chekhov: Ladies with an without dogs
Although Nabokov's admiration for Chekhov's work is well-documented, relatively little critical attention has been paid to the connections between the two writers' works. This article concentrates on two of Nabokov’s stories as part of his larger dialogue with Chekhov. "The Reunion" is analyzed in conjunction with Chekhov’s story ‚The Lady with the Little Dog,‛ focusing on the theme of deception in both stories, particularly the notion of secret, double lives. The analysis also includes an examination of the stories’ structural similarities, including the continual overturning of both characters’ and readers’ expectations. The expected endings do not occur in either story, and the ultimate conclusions are open-ended and ambiguous. While "The Reunion" is a relatively straightforward story, "That in Aleppo Once. . . " is considerably more complex. Nabokov deliberately complicates matters by creating both an unreliable narrator and a second character (the narrator’s wife) who invents stories about her experiences. Thus Nabokov takes Chekhov’s ambiguity a step further: not only is the future of the characters uncertain, the past is as well. The Chekhovian subtext appears throughout the story, and it turns out that the story is a reversal or subversion of Chekhovian details and devices. Perhaps most striking are the authors’ respective treatments of their heroines. While Chekhov creates a character in Anna Sergeyevna who at first appears to be a literary type and then transforms her into a complex individual, Nabokov reverses this course. The narrator’s wife continually evades his and the reader’s understanding; the more we seem to learn about her, the less we really know. Finally, the narrator declares that his wife never existed at all, that she is simply "a phantom" who exists only on the page. From a metaliterary angle, of course, this is entirely accurate, since she is a fictional character. Thus Nabokov’s story simultaneously pays tribute to Chekhov and lays bare the mechanics of storytelling, narrative decisions, and the creative process itself.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
10
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊最新文献
Female Figures and Censorship: The Reception of Stefan Zweig in Spain (1946-1960) KOGNITIVE UND SEMANTISCHE ASPEKTE VON VERWENDUNG DES LEXEMS TON IN DER DEUTSCHEN UND IN DER SPANISCHEN PHRASEOLOGIE TENDENCIAS DEL HUMOR ÉTNICO: UN ANÁLISIS DE CHISTES CONTEMPORÁNEOS EN LENGUA RUSA La experiencia mística en Suma de claridades de Laureano Albán IMAGINACIÓN MATERIAL Y TROPISMOS. ACERCA DEL VÍNCULO ENTRE JUAN JOSÉ SAER Y NATHALIE SARRAUTE
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1