冷战时期朝鲜的宗教与和平:客座编辑简介

IF 0.1 3区 哲学 0 ASIAN STUDIES Journal of Korean Religions Pub Date : 2018-07-19 DOI:10.1353/JKR.2018.0000
Heonik Kwon, Seong-nae Kim
{"title":"冷战时期朝鲜的宗教与和平:客座编辑简介","authors":"Heonik Kwon, Seong-nae Kim","doi":"10.1353/JKR.2018.0000","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The Cold War is commonly understood as a global conflict that was principally about secular ideologies, the confrontation between two mutually exclusive visions of modernity that we refer to as capitalism and socialism. This understanding prevails in the existing academic literature concerning the second half of the twentieth century, and it also affects how we conceptualize the constitution of the contemporary world. The decade following the end of the Cold War witnessed rising ethnic nationalism of a religious nature, especially, but not exclusively, in the former Eastern Bloc. The Bosnian War (1992–1995) in the former Yugoslavia was one of the most shocking and tragic examples in this regard. The ensuing decade saw a series of other military crises—conventional and unconventional—which were often conducted in the name of specific religious doctrines or as countermeasures to these manifestations of religious fundamentalism. This situation provoked prolific debates, both in academia and the broader public, about the nature of modern secular society. Concerned commentators questioned what had happened to the ethics of secularism and whether modern political systems could coexist with forces that denied religious freedom and pluralism, the cardinal principles of modern political life. The whole situation reinforced the impression that religion had reentered politics in today’s world, and the related understanding that our time is in contrast to the Cold War era in which secular, rather than religious, ideologies held sway. Recent studies of Cold War history clearly show, however, that the above impression is misguided. Religious ideas and forces played formative roles in the making (and unmaking) of the bipolarized world of the Cold War era. For instance, Andrew Preston (2012) has explored the role of American Christian groups and movements in shaping US foreign policies during the Vietnam War. Observers of Central Asia and the Middle East are well cognizant of the fact that questions of Islamic fundamentalism, which are debated furiously","PeriodicalId":42017,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Korean Religions","volume":"9 1","pages":"10 - 5"},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2018-07-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1353/JKR.2018.0000","citationCount":"15","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Religions in Cold War Korea and Peacemaking: Guest Editors' Introduction\",\"authors\":\"Heonik Kwon, Seong-nae Kim\",\"doi\":\"10.1353/JKR.2018.0000\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The Cold War is commonly understood as a global conflict that was principally about secular ideologies, the confrontation between two mutually exclusive visions of modernity that we refer to as capitalism and socialism. This understanding prevails in the existing academic literature concerning the second half of the twentieth century, and it also affects how we conceptualize the constitution of the contemporary world. The decade following the end of the Cold War witnessed rising ethnic nationalism of a religious nature, especially, but not exclusively, in the former Eastern Bloc. The Bosnian War (1992–1995) in the former Yugoslavia was one of the most shocking and tragic examples in this regard. The ensuing decade saw a series of other military crises—conventional and unconventional—which were often conducted in the name of specific religious doctrines or as countermeasures to these manifestations of religious fundamentalism. This situation provoked prolific debates, both in academia and the broader public, about the nature of modern secular society. Concerned commentators questioned what had happened to the ethics of secularism and whether modern political systems could coexist with forces that denied religious freedom and pluralism, the cardinal principles of modern political life. The whole situation reinforced the impression that religion had reentered politics in today’s world, and the related understanding that our time is in contrast to the Cold War era in which secular, rather than religious, ideologies held sway. Recent studies of Cold War history clearly show, however, that the above impression is misguided. Religious ideas and forces played formative roles in the making (and unmaking) of the bipolarized world of the Cold War era. For instance, Andrew Preston (2012) has explored the role of American Christian groups and movements in shaping US foreign policies during the Vietnam War. Observers of Central Asia and the Middle East are well cognizant of the fact that questions of Islamic fundamentalism, which are debated furiously\",\"PeriodicalId\":42017,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Korean Religions\",\"volume\":\"9 1\",\"pages\":\"10 - 5\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2018-07-19\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1353/JKR.2018.0000\",\"citationCount\":\"15\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Korean Religions\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1353/JKR.2018.0000\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"哲学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"ASIAN STUDIES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Korean Religions","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1353/JKR.2018.0000","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"ASIAN STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 15

摘要

冷战通常被理解为一场主要涉及世俗意识形态的全球冲突,是我们称之为资本主义和社会主义的两种相互排斥的现代性愿景之间的对抗。这种理解在现存的关于20世纪下半叶的学术文献中普遍存在,它也影响着我们如何概念化当代世界的构成。冷战结束后的十年见证了宗教性质的种族民族主义的兴起,特别是在前东方集团,但不限于此。前南斯拉夫境内的波斯尼亚战争(1992-1995年)是这方面最令人震惊和悲惨的例子之一。在接下来的十年里,发生了一系列常规和非常规的军事危机,这些危机往往是以特定宗教教义的名义进行的,或者是作为对这些宗教原教旨主义表现的对策。这种情况在学术界和更广泛的公众中引发了关于现代世俗社会本质的大量辩论。忧心忡忡的评论人士质疑世俗主义的伦理到底出了什么问题,以及现代政治制度能否与否认宗教自由和多元主义(现代政治生活的基本原则)的势力共存。整个局势强化了宗教已重新进入当今世界政治的印象,以及与此相关的理解,即我们的时代与冷战时代形成鲜明对比,在冷战时代,世俗而非宗教的意识形态占主导地位。然而,最近对冷战历史的研究清楚地表明,上述印象是错误的。宗教思想和力量在冷战时期两极化世界的形成(和瓦解)中发挥了重要作用。例如,安德鲁·普雷斯顿(Andrew Preston, 2012)探讨了越战期间美国基督教团体和运动在塑造美国外交政策方面的作用。中亚和中东的观察家们都很清楚这样一个事实:伊斯兰原教旨主义的问题正在激烈辩论
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Religions in Cold War Korea and Peacemaking: Guest Editors' Introduction
The Cold War is commonly understood as a global conflict that was principally about secular ideologies, the confrontation between two mutually exclusive visions of modernity that we refer to as capitalism and socialism. This understanding prevails in the existing academic literature concerning the second half of the twentieth century, and it also affects how we conceptualize the constitution of the contemporary world. The decade following the end of the Cold War witnessed rising ethnic nationalism of a religious nature, especially, but not exclusively, in the former Eastern Bloc. The Bosnian War (1992–1995) in the former Yugoslavia was one of the most shocking and tragic examples in this regard. The ensuing decade saw a series of other military crises—conventional and unconventional—which were often conducted in the name of specific religious doctrines or as countermeasures to these manifestations of religious fundamentalism. This situation provoked prolific debates, both in academia and the broader public, about the nature of modern secular society. Concerned commentators questioned what had happened to the ethics of secularism and whether modern political systems could coexist with forces that denied religious freedom and pluralism, the cardinal principles of modern political life. The whole situation reinforced the impression that religion had reentered politics in today’s world, and the related understanding that our time is in contrast to the Cold War era in which secular, rather than religious, ideologies held sway. Recent studies of Cold War history clearly show, however, that the above impression is misguided. Religious ideas and forces played formative roles in the making (and unmaking) of the bipolarized world of the Cold War era. For instance, Andrew Preston (2012) has explored the role of American Christian groups and movements in shaping US foreign policies during the Vietnam War. Observers of Central Asia and the Middle East are well cognizant of the fact that questions of Islamic fundamentalism, which are debated furiously
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
11
期刊最新文献
Talismans ( pujŏk 符籍) for Rebirth in Chosŏn Buddhist Rituals and their Earlier Traces in China Talismans ( pujŏk 符籍) for Rebirth in Chosŏn Buddhist Rituals and their Earlier Traces in China Religion and the Cold War: A View from Korea Buddhist Rituals of Ch'ilsŏng, the Seven Stars of the Great Dipper, in Chosŏn Korea Practicing Motherhood and Forming Matrilineal Solidarity: A Counter-cultural Response to the Patrilineal Confucian Family in the Works of Park Wansuh (1931–2011)
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1