多重性伴侣的社会困境:失去伴侣关系的代价

IF 1.4 Q3 FAMILY STUDIES MARRIAGE AND FAMILY REVIEW Pub Date : 1999-11-01 DOI:10.1300/J002V29N01_02
R. Immerman, W. Mackey
{"title":"多重性伴侣的社会困境:失去伴侣关系的代价","authors":"R. Immerman, W. Mackey","doi":"10.1300/J002V29N01_02","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT Although human reproductive strategies, mating, do not preclude multiple sexual partners, virtually all marriage systems across the world reinforce a pair-bonding template. The question is addressed: why would cultural traditions so universally reinforce monogamy-pair-bonding-as a marriage system? Conversely, what happens when multiple partners are increased within a social group? Data are presented which suggest that an unraveling of the pair-bond template is aligned with a number of serious societal dysfunctions. In turn, these societal dysfunctions place the commonweal at a disadvantage in the competition among those societies, which generate alternative cultural formulae, based upon reduced numbers of sexual partners.","PeriodicalId":51527,"journal":{"name":"MARRIAGE AND FAMILY REVIEW","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"1999-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1300/J002V29N01_02","citationCount":"8","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The societal dilemma of multiple sexual partners: The costs of the loss of pair-bonding\",\"authors\":\"R. Immerman, W. Mackey\",\"doi\":\"10.1300/J002V29N01_02\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"ABSTRACT Although human reproductive strategies, mating, do not preclude multiple sexual partners, virtually all marriage systems across the world reinforce a pair-bonding template. The question is addressed: why would cultural traditions so universally reinforce monogamy-pair-bonding-as a marriage system? Conversely, what happens when multiple partners are increased within a social group? Data are presented which suggest that an unraveling of the pair-bond template is aligned with a number of serious societal dysfunctions. In turn, these societal dysfunctions place the commonweal at a disadvantage in the competition among those societies, which generate alternative cultural formulae, based upon reduced numbers of sexual partners.\",\"PeriodicalId\":51527,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"MARRIAGE AND FAMILY REVIEW\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"1999-11-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1300/J002V29N01_02\",\"citationCount\":\"8\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"MARRIAGE AND FAMILY REVIEW\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1300/J002V29N01_02\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"FAMILY STUDIES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"MARRIAGE AND FAMILY REVIEW","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1300/J002V29N01_02","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"FAMILY STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 8

摘要

虽然人类的生殖策略,即交配,并不排除多个性伴侣,但世界上几乎所有的婚姻制度都强化了一种伴侣结合的模板。问题是:为什么文化传统会如此普遍地强化一夫一妻制——夫妻结合——作为一种婚姻制度?相反,当一个社会群体中的多个伴侣增加时会发生什么?提出的数据表明,夫妻关系模板的瓦解与许多严重的社会功能失调是一致的。反过来,这些社会功能失调使公益在这些社会之间的竞争中处于不利地位,这些社会产生了基于性伴侣数量减少的另类文化模式。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
The societal dilemma of multiple sexual partners: The costs of the loss of pair-bonding
ABSTRACT Although human reproductive strategies, mating, do not preclude multiple sexual partners, virtually all marriage systems across the world reinforce a pair-bonding template. The question is addressed: why would cultural traditions so universally reinforce monogamy-pair-bonding-as a marriage system? Conversely, what happens when multiple partners are increased within a social group? Data are presented which suggest that an unraveling of the pair-bond template is aligned with a number of serious societal dysfunctions. In turn, these societal dysfunctions place the commonweal at a disadvantage in the competition among those societies, which generate alternative cultural formulae, based upon reduced numbers of sexual partners.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
MARRIAGE AND FAMILY REVIEW
MARRIAGE AND FAMILY REVIEW FAMILY STUDIES-
CiteScore
2.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
14
期刊介绍: Marriage & Family Review publishes a mix of open submission articles as well as thematic issues that bring together the most current research, practice, advances in theory development, and applications of knowledge on a particular topic in the field. Marriage & Family Review has historically welcomed open submissions from numerous international scholars and will continue to do so. The journal will continue to welcome manuscripts that concern family strengths and premarital relationship development. Another continued emphasis will be research-based manuscripts concerning controversial issues.
期刊最新文献
Ethnic Differences in the Effects of Five Disciplinary Techniques on Subsequent Externalizing Behavior Problems. "Best-Laid Plans": Barriers to Meeting Marital Timing Desires Over the Life Course. Rethinking and Revising Goode's Contribution to Global Family Change. Role of Marital Quality in Explaining Depressive Symptoms After Marital Termination Among Older Adults. Marriage Advantage in Subjective Well-Being: Causal Effect or Unmeasured Heterogeneity?
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1