提高普通肌肉骨骼问题的治疗能力:一项非效性随机对照试验和对皮质类固醇注射治疗肩痛的经济分析,比较物理治疗师和骨科医生。

IF 0.2 Q4 CHEMISTRY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY Revista Colombiana de Quimica Pub Date : 2016-09-15 eCollection Date: 2016-01-01 DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0162679
Darryn Marks, Leanne Bisset, Tracy Comans, Michael Thomas, Shu Kay Ng, Shaun O'Leary, Philip G Conaghan, Paul A Scuffham
{"title":"提高普通肌肉骨骼问题的治疗能力:一项非效性随机对照试验和对皮质类固醇注射治疗肩痛的经济分析,比较物理治疗师和骨科医生。","authors":"Darryn Marks, Leanne Bisset, Tracy Comans, Michael Thomas, Shu Kay Ng, Shaun O'Leary, Philip G Conaghan, Paul A Scuffham","doi":"10.1371/journal.pone.0162679","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Role substitution is a strategy employed to assist health services manage the growing demand for musculoskeletal care. Corticosteroid injection is a common treatment in this population but the efficacy of its prescription and delivery by physiotherapists has not been established against orthopaedic standards. This paper investigates whether corticosteroid injection given by a physiotherapist for shoulder pain is as clinically and cost effective as that from an orthopaedic surgeon.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A double blind non-inferiority randomized controlled trial was conducted in an Australian public hospital orthopaedic outpatient service, from January 2013 to June 2014. Adults with a General Practitioner referral to Orthopaedics for shoulder pain received subacromial corticosteroid and local anaesthetic injection prescribed and delivered independently by a physiotherapist or a consultant orthopaedic surgeon. The main outcome measure was total Shoulder Pain and Disability Index (SPADI) score at baseline, six and 12 weeks, applying a non-inferiority margin of 15 points. Secondary outcomes tested for superiority included pain, shoulder movement, perceived improvement, adverse events, satisfaction, quality of life and costs.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>278 participants were independently assessed by the physiotherapist and the orthopaedic surgeon, with 64 randomised (physiotherapist 33, orthopaedic surgeon 31). There were no significant differences in baseline characteristics between groups. Non-inferiority of injection by the physiotherapist was declared from total SPADI scores at 6 and 12 weeks (upper limit of the 95% one-sided confidence interval 13.34 and 7.17 at 6 and 12 weeks, respectively). There were no statistically significant differences between groups on any outcome measures at 6 or 12 weeks. From the perspective of the health funder, the physiotherapist was less expensive.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Corticosteroid injection for shoulder pain, provided by a suitably qualified physiotherapist is at least as clinically effective, and less expensive, compared with similar care delivered by an orthopaedic surgeon. Policy makers and service providers should consider implementing this model of care.</p><p><strong>Trial registration: </strong>Australia and New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry 12612000532808.</p>","PeriodicalId":43662,"journal":{"name":"Revista Colombiana de Quimica","volume":"50 1","pages":"e0162679"},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2016-09-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1371/journal.pone.0162679","citationCount":"14","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Increasing Capacity for the Treatment of Common Musculoskeletal Problems: A Non-Inferiority RCT and Economic Analysis of Corticosteroid Injection for Shoulder Pain Comparing a Physiotherapist and Orthopaedic Surgeon.\",\"authors\":\"Darryn Marks, Leanne Bisset, Tracy Comans, Michael Thomas, Shu Kay Ng, Shaun O'Leary, Philip G Conaghan, Paul A Scuffham\",\"doi\":\"10.1371/journal.pone.0162679\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Role substitution is a strategy employed to assist health services manage the growing demand for musculoskeletal care. Corticosteroid injection is a common treatment in this population but the efficacy of its prescription and delivery by physiotherapists has not been established against orthopaedic standards. This paper investigates whether corticosteroid injection given by a physiotherapist for shoulder pain is as clinically and cost effective as that from an orthopaedic surgeon.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A double blind non-inferiority randomized controlled trial was conducted in an Australian public hospital orthopaedic outpatient service, from January 2013 to June 2014. Adults with a General Practitioner referral to Orthopaedics for shoulder pain received subacromial corticosteroid and local anaesthetic injection prescribed and delivered independently by a physiotherapist or a consultant orthopaedic surgeon. The main outcome measure was total Shoulder Pain and Disability Index (SPADI) score at baseline, six and 12 weeks, applying a non-inferiority margin of 15 points. Secondary outcomes tested for superiority included pain, shoulder movement, perceived improvement, adverse events, satisfaction, quality of life and costs.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>278 participants were independently assessed by the physiotherapist and the orthopaedic surgeon, with 64 randomised (physiotherapist 33, orthopaedic surgeon 31). There were no significant differences in baseline characteristics between groups. Non-inferiority of injection by the physiotherapist was declared from total SPADI scores at 6 and 12 weeks (upper limit of the 95% one-sided confidence interval 13.34 and 7.17 at 6 and 12 weeks, respectively). There were no statistically significant differences between groups on any outcome measures at 6 or 12 weeks. From the perspective of the health funder, the physiotherapist was less expensive.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Corticosteroid injection for shoulder pain, provided by a suitably qualified physiotherapist is at least as clinically effective, and less expensive, compared with similar care delivered by an orthopaedic surgeon. Policy makers and service providers should consider implementing this model of care.</p><p><strong>Trial registration: </strong>Australia and New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry 12612000532808.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":43662,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Revista Colombiana de Quimica\",\"volume\":\"50 1\",\"pages\":\"e0162679\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2016-09-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1371/journal.pone.0162679\",\"citationCount\":\"14\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Revista Colombiana de Quimica\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"103\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0162679\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2016/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"CHEMISTRY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Revista Colombiana de Quimica","FirstCategoryId":"103","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0162679","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2016/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"CHEMISTRY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 14

摘要

背景:角色替代是一种策略,用于协助卫生服务管理对肌肉骨骼护理日益增长的需求。皮质类固醇注射在这一人群中是一种常见的治疗方法,但其处方和物理治疗师的治疗效果尚未根据骨科标准确定。本文调查了由物理治疗师注射皮质类固醇治疗肩痛是否与骨科医生注射皮质类固醇具有同样的临床和成本效益。方法:2013年1月至2014年6月在澳大利亚某公立医院骨科门诊进行双盲非劣效随机对照试验。由全科医生转诊到骨科治疗肩部疼痛的成年人接受肩峰下皮质类固醇和局部麻醉注射,由物理治疗师或骨科顾问医生独立处方和递送。主要结局指标是基线、第6周和第12周的总肩痛和残疾指数(SPADI)评分,采用15分的非劣效性裕度。测试优势的次要结果包括疼痛、肩部运动、感知改善、不良事件、满意度、生活质量和成本。结果:278名参与者由物理治疗师和骨科医生独立评估,其中64名随机分组(物理治疗师33名,骨科医生31名)。两组间基线特征无显著差异。从第6周和第12周的SPADI总评分(第6周和第12周的95%单侧可信区间上限分别为13.34和7.17)来宣布物理治疗师注射的非劣效性。在6周或12周时,两组在任何结果测量上没有统计学上的显著差异。从卫生资助者的角度来看,物理治疗师的费用较低。结论:与骨科医生提供的类似治疗相比,由合格的物理治疗师提供的皮质类固醇注射治疗肩痛至少具有同等的临床效果,而且费用更低。政策制定者和服务提供者应考虑实施这种护理模式。试验注册:澳大利亚和新西兰临床试验注册中心12612000532808。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Increasing Capacity for the Treatment of Common Musculoskeletal Problems: A Non-Inferiority RCT and Economic Analysis of Corticosteroid Injection for Shoulder Pain Comparing a Physiotherapist and Orthopaedic Surgeon.

Background: Role substitution is a strategy employed to assist health services manage the growing demand for musculoskeletal care. Corticosteroid injection is a common treatment in this population but the efficacy of its prescription and delivery by physiotherapists has not been established against orthopaedic standards. This paper investigates whether corticosteroid injection given by a physiotherapist for shoulder pain is as clinically and cost effective as that from an orthopaedic surgeon.

Methods: A double blind non-inferiority randomized controlled trial was conducted in an Australian public hospital orthopaedic outpatient service, from January 2013 to June 2014. Adults with a General Practitioner referral to Orthopaedics for shoulder pain received subacromial corticosteroid and local anaesthetic injection prescribed and delivered independently by a physiotherapist or a consultant orthopaedic surgeon. The main outcome measure was total Shoulder Pain and Disability Index (SPADI) score at baseline, six and 12 weeks, applying a non-inferiority margin of 15 points. Secondary outcomes tested for superiority included pain, shoulder movement, perceived improvement, adverse events, satisfaction, quality of life and costs.

Results: 278 participants were independently assessed by the physiotherapist and the orthopaedic surgeon, with 64 randomised (physiotherapist 33, orthopaedic surgeon 31). There were no significant differences in baseline characteristics between groups. Non-inferiority of injection by the physiotherapist was declared from total SPADI scores at 6 and 12 weeks (upper limit of the 95% one-sided confidence interval 13.34 and 7.17 at 6 and 12 weeks, respectively). There were no statistically significant differences between groups on any outcome measures at 6 or 12 weeks. From the perspective of the health funder, the physiotherapist was less expensive.

Conclusions: Corticosteroid injection for shoulder pain, provided by a suitably qualified physiotherapist is at least as clinically effective, and less expensive, compared with similar care delivered by an orthopaedic surgeon. Policy makers and service providers should consider implementing this model of care.

Trial registration: Australia and New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry 12612000532808.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Revista Colombiana de Quimica
Revista Colombiana de Quimica CHEMISTRY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY-
CiteScore
1.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
12
期刊介绍: The Revista Colombiana de Química - Colombian Journal of Chemistry (Rev. Colomb. Quim.) Is a peer-reviewed scientific journal of the Department of Chemistry, Faculty of Sciences of the Universidad Nacional de Colombia, Bogotá. It currently publishes three volumes per year: January-April, May-August and September-December. All the content published by the Journal (available online) is under a Creative Commons attribution license type BY 4.0, that allows any person or entity in the world to freely access the content, share it, download it, adapt it or make derivative works without any restriction, provided that it adequately indicates the credit to the authors and to the Colombian Journal of Chemistry.
期刊最新文献
Patterns and drivers of plant sexual systems in the dry-hot valley region of southwestern China. Estudio teórico de la oxidación de CO con O2 usando catalizadores de Au-Pd y Au-Pt Modelamiento in silico de la liasa organomercurial (MerB) de Pseudomonas fluorescens Evaluación del desempeño de una celda de combustible microbiana con electrodo de grafito modificado para el tratamiento de agua residual del procesamiento del café Syntheses and magnetic properties of substituted bis-indacenyl bi-metallic complexes & application
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1