走向自信的中立。费迪南四世,阿克顿和与俄国的海军公约,1779-1789

IF 0.1 4区 历史学 Q4 HISTORY NUOVA RIVISTA STORICA Pub Date : 2020-01-01 DOI:10.1400/277150
E. Gin
{"title":"走向自信的中立。费迪南四世,阿克顿和与俄国的海军公约,1779-1789","authors":"E. Gin","doi":"10.1400/277150","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The history of the commercial treaty with Russia has been described many times. The narrative, however, has focused mainly on economic negotiations in the broader context of mutual economic relations. Furthermore, with few exceptions, the trade agreement and the special relationship established with St. Petersburg have been viewed as fortuitous or as the by-product of Marie Caroline’s and Acton’s adventurist and pro-British attitude. This article addresses the matter by reading the naval convention with Russia, signed in 1787, in the broader context of The Kingdom’s history and of the international relations of the period. In this light, friendly relations with St. Petersburg appear as a coherent element of the effort to give the Kingdom the more flexible neutrality it needed in the Europe of the second half of the Eighteenth Century. In this regard, it should be stressed that Acton’s naval plan, of which the naval agreement was an important element, was conceived to be a tool in the Kingdom’s diplomacy without predetermining the actual choices that would be made during the French Revolution. More interestingly, as political considerations preceded any economic and commercial interests, the collaboration between Acton and the king in signing the treaty has turned out to be closer than generally suspected.","PeriodicalId":42962,"journal":{"name":"NUOVA RIVISTA STORICA","volume":"104 1","pages":"193-220"},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2020-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Towards an Assertive Neutrality. Ferdinand IV, Acton and the Naval Convention with Russia, 1779-1789\",\"authors\":\"E. Gin\",\"doi\":\"10.1400/277150\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The history of the commercial treaty with Russia has been described many times. The narrative, however, has focused mainly on economic negotiations in the broader context of mutual economic relations. Furthermore, with few exceptions, the trade agreement and the special relationship established with St. Petersburg have been viewed as fortuitous or as the by-product of Marie Caroline’s and Acton’s adventurist and pro-British attitude. This article addresses the matter by reading the naval convention with Russia, signed in 1787, in the broader context of The Kingdom’s history and of the international relations of the period. In this light, friendly relations with St. Petersburg appear as a coherent element of the effort to give the Kingdom the more flexible neutrality it needed in the Europe of the second half of the Eighteenth Century. In this regard, it should be stressed that Acton’s naval plan, of which the naval agreement was an important element, was conceived to be a tool in the Kingdom’s diplomacy without predetermining the actual choices that would be made during the French Revolution. More interestingly, as political considerations preceded any economic and commercial interests, the collaboration between Acton and the king in signing the treaty has turned out to be closer than generally suspected.\",\"PeriodicalId\":42962,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"NUOVA RIVISTA STORICA\",\"volume\":\"104 1\",\"pages\":\"193-220\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"NUOVA RIVISTA STORICA\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1400/277150\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"历史学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"HISTORY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"NUOVA RIVISTA STORICA","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1400/277150","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"历史学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"HISTORY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

与俄罗斯的商业条约的历史已经被描述了很多次。然而,叙述主要集中在相互经济关系的更广泛背景下的经济谈判。此外,除了少数例外,贸易协定和与圣彼得堡建立的特殊关系被认为是偶然的,或者是玛丽·卡洛琳和阿克顿的冒险主义和亲英态度的副产品。本文通过在王国历史和当时国际关系的更广泛背景下解读1787年与俄罗斯签署的海军公约来解决这个问题。从这个角度来看,与圣彼得堡的友好关系似乎是一个连贯的因素,以使王国在十八世纪下半叶的欧洲获得更灵活的中立地位。在这方面,应当强调指出,阿克顿的海军计划,其中海军协定是一项重要内容,被设想为王国外交的一个工具,而没有预先决定在法国大革命期间将作出的实际选择。更有趣的是,由于政治考虑先于经济和商业利益,阿克顿和国王在签署条约时的合作比人们普遍认为的要密切。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Towards an Assertive Neutrality. Ferdinand IV, Acton and the Naval Convention with Russia, 1779-1789
The history of the commercial treaty with Russia has been described many times. The narrative, however, has focused mainly on economic negotiations in the broader context of mutual economic relations. Furthermore, with few exceptions, the trade agreement and the special relationship established with St. Petersburg have been viewed as fortuitous or as the by-product of Marie Caroline’s and Acton’s adventurist and pro-British attitude. This article addresses the matter by reading the naval convention with Russia, signed in 1787, in the broader context of The Kingdom’s history and of the international relations of the period. In this light, friendly relations with St. Petersburg appear as a coherent element of the effort to give the Kingdom the more flexible neutrality it needed in the Europe of the second half of the Eighteenth Century. In this regard, it should be stressed that Acton’s naval plan, of which the naval agreement was an important element, was conceived to be a tool in the Kingdom’s diplomacy without predetermining the actual choices that would be made during the French Revolution. More interestingly, as political considerations preceded any economic and commercial interests, the collaboration between Acton and the king in signing the treaty has turned out to be closer than generally suspected.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
43
期刊介绍: La «Nuova Rivista Storica» fu fondata nel 1917 da Corrado Barbagallo: era in corso la prima guerra mondiale ed è probabile che quanto avveniva nel nostro paese e in tutta l’Europa sia stato determinante nel condizionarne il programma che fu pensato «un po’ diverso da quello comune alle altre riviste storiche» (Il nostro programma, firmato La Redazione, fasc.1, a. 1 gennaio-marzo 1917). In esso si auspicava infatti di poter «esercitare una speciale azione nell’ambito della nostra cultura storiografica: quella che nel pensiero dei suoi ideatori è parsa la più conforme ai bisogni dell’ora che volge».
期刊最新文献
L’Italia fascista e la questione austriaca,1922-1938 Il brain trust di Roosevelt davanti al corporativismo fascista L’amicizia impossibile? Le relazioni economiche tra Italia e Germania negli anni Trenta 'Aid and Relief': l’assistenza UNRRA in Italia, 1944-1947 Tra evangelismo e fascismo : gli anni giovanili di Salvatore Caponetto
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1