洛克是对的:自然没有什么经济价值

Report from the Institute for Philosophy & Public Policy Pub Date : 2005-08-01 DOI:10.13021/G8PPPQ.252005.179

M. Sagoff

{"title":"洛克是对的:自然没有什么经济价值","authors":"M. Sagoff","doi":"10.13021/G8PPPQ.252005.179","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Locke understood that since God created Nature, humanity has a moral and spiritual obligation to respect and preserve it. Locke was right to argue, however, that from the perspective of economic value, Nature furnishes only \"worthless materials.\"","PeriodicalId":82464,"journal":{"name":"Report from the Institute for Philosophy & Public Policy","volume":"25 1","pages":"2-11"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2005-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"5","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Locke Was Right: Nature Has Little Economic Value\",\"authors\":\"M. Sagoff\",\"doi\":\"10.13021/G8PPPQ.252005.179\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Locke understood that since God created Nature, humanity has a moral and spiritual obligation to respect and preserve it. Locke was right to argue, however, that from the perspective of economic value, Nature furnishes only \\\"worthless materials.\\\"\",\"PeriodicalId\":82464,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Report from the Institute for Philosophy & Public Policy\",\"volume\":\"25 1\",\"pages\":\"2-11\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2005-08-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"5\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Report from the Institute for Philosophy & Public Policy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.13021/G8PPPQ.252005.179\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Report from the Institute for Philosophy & Public Policy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.13021/G8PPPQ.252005.179","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 5

摘要

洛克明白，既然上帝创造了自然，人类就有道德和精神上的义务去尊重和保护自然。洛克的观点是正确的，然而，从经济价值的角度来看，自然只提供“毫无价值的材料”。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

查看原文

微信好友朋友圈 QQ好友复制链接

本刊更多论文

Locke Was Right: Nature Has Little Economic Value

Locke understood that since God created Nature, humanity has a moral and spiritual obligation to respect and preserve it. Locke was right to argue, however, that from the perspective of economic value, Nature furnishes only "worthless materials."

求助全文

通过发布文献求助，成功后即可免费获取论文全文。去求助

来源期刊

Report from the Institute for Philosophy & Public Policy

自引率

0.00%

发文量

期刊最新文献

Objectivity and Subjectivity in Theories of Well-Being Political Leadership and the Social Value of Privacy Some Scalar Issues in Climate Ethics Defining Scientific Integrity The Role of Non-Governmental Organizations in the Repatriation of Refugees