为宗教社区协会辩护

Report from the Institute for Philosophy & Public Policy Pub Date : 2005-12-01 DOI:10.13021/G8PPPQ.252005.176

R. Nelson

{"title":"为宗教社区协会辩护","authors":"R. Nelson","doi":"10.13021/G8PPPQ.252005.176","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Religion in most cases currently is a prohibited category in matters of housing. I argue that the current provisions of the Fair Housing Act, at least as they apply to discrimination based on religion, are themselves unconstitutional.","PeriodicalId":82464,"journal":{"name":"Report from the Institute for Philosophy & Public Policy","volume":"147 1","pages":"10-15"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2005-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"In Defense of Religious Neighborhood Associations\",\"authors\":\"R. Nelson\",\"doi\":\"10.13021/G8PPPQ.252005.176\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Religion in most cases currently is a prohibited category in matters of housing. I argue that the current provisions of the Fair Housing Act, at least as they apply to discrimination based on religion, are themselves unconstitutional.\",\"PeriodicalId\":82464,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Report from the Institute for Philosophy & Public Policy\",\"volume\":\"147 1\",\"pages\":\"10-15\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2005-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Report from the Institute for Philosophy & Public Policy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.13021/G8PPPQ.252005.176\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Report from the Institute for Philosophy & Public Policy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.13021/G8PPPQ.252005.176","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

摘要

在大多数情况下，宗教目前在住房问题上是被禁止的。我认为，《公平住房法》的现行条款，至少在适用于基于宗教的歧视方面，本身就是违宪的。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

查看原文

微信好友朋友圈 QQ好友复制链接

本刊更多论文

In Defense of Religious Neighborhood Associations

Religion in most cases currently is a prohibited category in matters of housing. I argue that the current provisions of the Fair Housing Act, at least as they apply to discrimination based on religion, are themselves unconstitutional.

求助全文

通过发布文献求助，成功后即可免费获取论文全文。去求助

来源期刊

Report from the Institute for Philosophy & Public Policy

自引率

0.00%

发文量

期刊最新文献

Objectivity and Subjectivity in Theories of Well-Being Political Leadership and the Social Value of Privacy Some Scalar Issues in Climate Ethics Defining Scientific Integrity The Role of Non-Governmental Organizations in the Repatriation of Refugees