市场、自由贸易和宗教

R. Nelson
{"title":"市场、自由贸易和宗教","authors":"R. Nelson","doi":"10.13021/G8PPPQ.312013.453","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Economists in the United States are strongly divided between those who advocate free markets and those who defend politically inspired regulations and policies. Almost all economists, whatever their political views, however, have traditionally agreed that the extension of free market principles internationally is desirable, that is, global free trade. To understand why there is there much greater agreement among economists about free trade in the international arena, we have to explore the religious, social, and cultural assumptions that lead them to believe that whether or not free trade serves the interests of any one country at a particular time, it leads -- sometimes ruthlessly -- the betterment of humanity worldwide.","PeriodicalId":82464,"journal":{"name":"Report from the Institute for Philosophy & Public Policy","volume":"31 1","pages":"19-26"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2013-09-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Markets, Free Trade, and Religion\",\"authors\":\"R. Nelson\",\"doi\":\"10.13021/G8PPPQ.312013.453\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Economists in the United States are strongly divided between those who advocate free markets and those who defend politically inspired regulations and policies. Almost all economists, whatever their political views, however, have traditionally agreed that the extension of free market principles internationally is desirable, that is, global free trade. To understand why there is there much greater agreement among economists about free trade in the international arena, we have to explore the religious, social, and cultural assumptions that lead them to believe that whether or not free trade serves the interests of any one country at a particular time, it leads -- sometimes ruthlessly -- the betterment of humanity worldwide.\",\"PeriodicalId\":82464,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Report from the Institute for Philosophy & Public Policy\",\"volume\":\"31 1\",\"pages\":\"19-26\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2013-09-22\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Report from the Institute for Philosophy & Public Policy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.13021/G8PPPQ.312013.453\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Report from the Institute for Philosophy & Public Policy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.13021/G8PPPQ.312013.453","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

美国的经济学家分为两派,一派主张自由市场,另一派则为出于政治动机的监管和政策辩护。然而,几乎所有经济学家,无论其政治观点如何,传统上都一致认为,自由市场原则在国际上的扩展是可取的,即全球自由贸易。为了理解为什么经济学家对国际舞台上的自由贸易有更大的共识,我们必须探索宗教、社会和文化假设,这些假设导致他们相信,无论自由贸易是否在特定时期服务于任何一个国家的利益,它都会导致——有时是无情的——世界范围内人类的改善。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Markets, Free Trade, and Religion
Economists in the United States are strongly divided between those who advocate free markets and those who defend politically inspired regulations and policies. Almost all economists, whatever their political views, however, have traditionally agreed that the extension of free market principles internationally is desirable, that is, global free trade. To understand why there is there much greater agreement among economists about free trade in the international arena, we have to explore the religious, social, and cultural assumptions that lead them to believe that whether or not free trade serves the interests of any one country at a particular time, it leads -- sometimes ruthlessly -- the betterment of humanity worldwide.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Objectivity and Subjectivity in Theories of Well-Being Political Leadership and the Social Value of Privacy Some Scalar Issues in Climate Ethics Defining Scientific Integrity The Role of Non-Governmental Organizations in the Repatriation of Refugees
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1