慢性腰痛患者在重复性举重任务中脊柱运动变异性增加。

IF 2 4区 医学 Q3 NEUROSCIENCES Journal of Electromyography and Kinesiology Pub Date : 2023-10-14 DOI:10.1016/j.jelekin.2023.102832
Amal M. Alsubaie , Andy Sanderson , Hélio V. Cabral , Eduardo Martinez-Valdes , Deborah Falla
{"title":"慢性腰痛患者在重复性举重任务中脊柱运动变异性增加。","authors":"Amal M. Alsubaie ,&nbsp;Andy Sanderson ,&nbsp;Hélio V. Cabral ,&nbsp;Eduardo Martinez-Valdes ,&nbsp;Deborah Falla","doi":"10.1016/j.jelekin.2023.102832","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Changes in spinal kinematic variability have been observed in people with chronic non-specific LBP (CNSLBP) during the performance of various repetitive functional tasks. However, the direction of these changes (i.e., less or more kinematic variability) is not consistent. This study aimed to assess differences in kinematic variability of the 3D angular displacement of thoracic and lumbar spinal segments in people with CNSLBP compared to asymptomatic individuals during a repetitive lifting task. Eleven people with CNSLBP and 11 asymptomatic volunteers performed 10 cycles of multi-planar lifting movements while spinal kinematics were recorded. For the three planes of motion, point-by-point standard deviations (SDs) were computed across all cycles of lifting and the average was calculated as a measure of kinematic variability for both segments. People with CNSLBP displayed higher thoracic (F = 8.00, <em>p</em> = 0.010, ηp<sup>2</sup> = 0.286) and lumbar kinematic variability (F = 5.48, <em>p</em> = 0.030, ηp<sup>2</sup> = 0.215) in the sagittal plane. Moreover, group differences were observed in the transversal plane for thoracic (F = 7.62, <em>p</em> = 0.012, ηp<sup>2</sup> = 0.276) and lumbar kinematic variability (F = 5.402, <em>p</em> = 0.031, ηp<sup>2</sup> = 0.213), as well as in the frontal plane for thoracic (F = 7.27, <em>p</em> = 0.014, ηp<sup>2</sup> = 0.267) and lumbar kinematic variability (F = 6.11, <em>p</em> = 0.022, ηp<sup>2</sup> = 0.234), all showing higher variability in those with CNSLBP. A significant main effect of group was not detected (<em>p</em> &gt; 0.05) for spinal range of motion (ROM). Thus, people with CNSLBP completed the lifting task with the same ROM in all three planes of motion as observed for asymptomatic individuals, yet they performed the lifting task with higher spinal kinematic cycle-to-cycle variation.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":56123,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Electromyography and Kinesiology","volume":"73 ","pages":"Article 102832"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1050641123000913/pdfft?md5=2ed5f9d76f0b0cee33259db7d1b3ee1f&pid=1-s2.0-S1050641123000913-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Spinal kinematic variability is increased in people with chronic low back pain during a repetitive lifting task\",\"authors\":\"Amal M. Alsubaie ,&nbsp;Andy Sanderson ,&nbsp;Hélio V. Cabral ,&nbsp;Eduardo Martinez-Valdes ,&nbsp;Deborah Falla\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jelekin.2023.102832\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>Changes in spinal kinematic variability have been observed in people with chronic non-specific LBP (CNSLBP) during the performance of various repetitive functional tasks. However, the direction of these changes (i.e., less or more kinematic variability) is not consistent. This study aimed to assess differences in kinematic variability of the 3D angular displacement of thoracic and lumbar spinal segments in people with CNSLBP compared to asymptomatic individuals during a repetitive lifting task. Eleven people with CNSLBP and 11 asymptomatic volunteers performed 10 cycles of multi-planar lifting movements while spinal kinematics were recorded. For the three planes of motion, point-by-point standard deviations (SDs) were computed across all cycles of lifting and the average was calculated as a measure of kinematic variability for both segments. People with CNSLBP displayed higher thoracic (F = 8.00, <em>p</em> = 0.010, ηp<sup>2</sup> = 0.286) and lumbar kinematic variability (F = 5.48, <em>p</em> = 0.030, ηp<sup>2</sup> = 0.215) in the sagittal plane. Moreover, group differences were observed in the transversal plane for thoracic (F = 7.62, <em>p</em> = 0.012, ηp<sup>2</sup> = 0.276) and lumbar kinematic variability (F = 5.402, <em>p</em> = 0.031, ηp<sup>2</sup> = 0.213), as well as in the frontal plane for thoracic (F = 7.27, <em>p</em> = 0.014, ηp<sup>2</sup> = 0.267) and lumbar kinematic variability (F = 6.11, <em>p</em> = 0.022, ηp<sup>2</sup> = 0.234), all showing higher variability in those with CNSLBP. A significant main effect of group was not detected (<em>p</em> &gt; 0.05) for spinal range of motion (ROM). Thus, people with CNSLBP completed the lifting task with the same ROM in all three planes of motion as observed for asymptomatic individuals, yet they performed the lifting task with higher spinal kinematic cycle-to-cycle variation.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":56123,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Electromyography and Kinesiology\",\"volume\":\"73 \",\"pages\":\"Article 102832\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-10-14\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1050641123000913/pdfft?md5=2ed5f9d76f0b0cee33259db7d1b3ee1f&pid=1-s2.0-S1050641123000913-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Electromyography and Kinesiology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1050641123000913\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"NEUROSCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Electromyography and Kinesiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1050641123000913","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"NEUROSCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在慢性非特异性LBP(CNSLBP)患者执行各种重复功能任务期间,已观察到脊柱运动变异性的变化。然而,这些变化的方向(即更少或更多的运动学变化)并不一致。本研究旨在评估CNSLBP患者与无症状患者在重复举重任务中胸腰椎节段三维角位移的运动变异性差异。11名CNSLBP患者和11名无症状志愿者进行了10个周期的多平面提升运动,同时记录了脊柱运动学。对于三个运动平面,在所有提升循环中计算逐点标准偏差(SD),并计算平均值作为两个节段运动可变性的测量值。CNSLBP患者在矢状面上表现出较高的胸部(F=8.00,p=0.010,ηp2=0.286)和腰部运动变异性(F=5.48,p=0.030,ηp2=0.0215)。此外,在胸部(F=7.62,p=0.012,ηp2=0.276)和腰部运动变异性(F=5.402,p=0.031,ηp2=0.0213)的横向平面上,以及在胸部(F=7.27,p=0.014,ηp20.267)和腰部运动学变异性(F=6.11,p=0.022,ηp20.234)的额叶平面上,观察到了组间差异,在CNSLBP患者中均显示出较高的变异性。该组对脊柱活动范围(ROM)没有显著的主要影响(p>0.05)。因此,CNSLBP患者在所有三个运动平面上都以与无症状个体相同的ROM完成了提升任务,但他们在执行提升任务时脊柱运动周期与周期之间的变化更高。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Spinal kinematic variability is increased in people with chronic low back pain during a repetitive lifting task

Changes in spinal kinematic variability have been observed in people with chronic non-specific LBP (CNSLBP) during the performance of various repetitive functional tasks. However, the direction of these changes (i.e., less or more kinematic variability) is not consistent. This study aimed to assess differences in kinematic variability of the 3D angular displacement of thoracic and lumbar spinal segments in people with CNSLBP compared to asymptomatic individuals during a repetitive lifting task. Eleven people with CNSLBP and 11 asymptomatic volunteers performed 10 cycles of multi-planar lifting movements while spinal kinematics were recorded. For the three planes of motion, point-by-point standard deviations (SDs) were computed across all cycles of lifting and the average was calculated as a measure of kinematic variability for both segments. People with CNSLBP displayed higher thoracic (F = 8.00, p = 0.010, ηp2 = 0.286) and lumbar kinematic variability (F = 5.48, p = 0.030, ηp2 = 0.215) in the sagittal plane. Moreover, group differences were observed in the transversal plane for thoracic (F = 7.62, p = 0.012, ηp2 = 0.276) and lumbar kinematic variability (F = 5.402, p = 0.031, ηp2 = 0.213), as well as in the frontal plane for thoracic (F = 7.27, p = 0.014, ηp2 = 0.267) and lumbar kinematic variability (F = 6.11, p = 0.022, ηp2 = 0.234), all showing higher variability in those with CNSLBP. A significant main effect of group was not detected (p > 0.05) for spinal range of motion (ROM). Thus, people with CNSLBP completed the lifting task with the same ROM in all three planes of motion as observed for asymptomatic individuals, yet they performed the lifting task with higher spinal kinematic cycle-to-cycle variation.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.70
自引率
8.00%
发文量
70
审稿时长
74 days
期刊介绍: Journal of Electromyography & Kinesiology is the primary source for outstanding original articles on the study of human movement from muscle contraction via its motor units and sensory system to integrated motion through mechanical and electrical detection techniques. As the official publication of the International Society of Electrophysiology and Kinesiology, the journal is dedicated to publishing the best work in all areas of electromyography and kinesiology, including: control of movement, muscle fatigue, muscle and nerve properties, joint biomechanics and electrical stimulation. Applications in rehabilitation, sports & exercise, motion analysis, ergonomics, alternative & complimentary medicine, measures of human performance and technical articles on electromyographic signal processing are welcome.
期刊最新文献
Inter-session Reliability of Magnetic Nerve Stimulation and Within-Session comparison to Electrical Nerve Stimulation in Evaluating Neuromuscular Function of Knee Extensor Muscles. Effect of tasks on intramuscular regional differences in rectus femoris elasticity during isometric contraction: An ultrasound shear wave elastography study. Flexor hallucis longus and tibialis anterior: A synergistic relationship. The unprecedented progresses in neuromechanics over the past 50 years - In celebration of the 50th anniversary of the international society of biomechanics. Wavelet-based time-frequency intermuscular beta-band coherence decreases with age but increases after mental fatigue in ankle muscles during gait independent of age.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1