{"title":"对学习者的评论:名义冲击仍然重要吗?","authors":"Scott Sumner","doi":"10.1515/1553-3832.1850","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Ed Leamer's recent column in this journal is illustrative of a puzzling trend in macroeconomics — the seeming denial of the long-held Keynesian and monetarist view that nominal shocks have real effects.","PeriodicalId":42390,"journal":{"name":"Economists Voice","volume":"9 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.4000,"publicationDate":"2012-07-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1515/1553-3832.1850","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comment on Leamer: Do Nominal Shocks Still Matter?\",\"authors\":\"Scott Sumner\",\"doi\":\"10.1515/1553-3832.1850\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract Ed Leamer's recent column in this journal is illustrative of a puzzling trend in macroeconomics — the seeming denial of the long-held Keynesian and monetarist view that nominal shocks have real effects.\",\"PeriodicalId\":42390,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Economists Voice\",\"volume\":\"9 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2012-07-23\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1515/1553-3832.1850\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Economists Voice\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1515/1553-3832.1850\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"ECONOMICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Economists Voice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1515/1553-3832.1850","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
Ed Leamer最近在本刊上的专栏阐述了宏观经济学中一个令人困惑的趋势——似乎否定了长期持有的凯恩斯主义和货币主义观点，即名义冲击具有实际影响。
Comment on Leamer: Do Nominal Shocks Still Matter?
Abstract Ed Leamer's recent column in this journal is illustrative of a puzzling trend in macroeconomics — the seeming denial of the long-held Keynesian and monetarist view that nominal shocks have real effects.
期刊介绍：
This journal is a non-partisan forum for economists to present innovative policy ideas or engaging commentary on the issues of the day. Readers include professional economists, lawyers, policy analysts, policymakers, and students of economics. Articles are short, 600-2000 words, and are intended to contain deeper analysis than is found on the Op-Ed page of the Wall Street Journal or New York Times, but to be of comparable general interest. We welcome submitted Columns from any professional economist. Letters to the editor are encouraged and may comment on any Column or Letter. Letters must be less than 300 words.
京公网安备 11010802042870号
京ICP备2023020795号-1
分享
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：
扫码关注我们
