《爱与春天:唐·丹尼斯和艾拉斯·努涅斯之间的辩论》

IF 0.2 4区 文学 N/A LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS ZEITSCHRIFT FUR ROMANISCHE PHILOLOGIE Pub Date : 2022-10-01 DOI:10.1515/zrp-2022-0040
Pilar Lorenzo Gradín
{"title":"《爱与春天:唐·丹尼斯和艾拉斯·努涅斯之间的辩论》","authors":"Pilar Lorenzo Gradín","doi":"10.1515/zrp-2022-0040","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Critics have interpreted Don Denis’ cantiga Proençaes soen mui bem trobar as a diatribe directed against Occitan troubadours who associated in their poems springtime exordium and song for love. Although some have considered the particular piece of the Portuguese king an aesthetic recreation of the cansós that rejected the début printanier cliché, in this contribution a different reading is proposed. Given that in the entire corpus of the cantigas de amor there is only one text by the Galician clergyman Airas Nunez (Que muito m’eu pago d’este verão) that unites spring, euphoric love, and lyrical activity, this article argues that Don Denis’ poem emerged as a polemic and ironic response to the eccentric verses of his colleague. From the proposed perspective, the king’s cantiga is contextually situated and understood as part of a series of texts that integrate the king and the clergyman’s metaliterary debate on the conception of love.","PeriodicalId":44119,"journal":{"name":"ZEITSCHRIFT FUR ROMANISCHE PHILOLOGIE","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2022-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"De amor y primavera: el debate entre don Denis y Airas Nunez\",\"authors\":\"Pilar Lorenzo Gradín\",\"doi\":\"10.1515/zrp-2022-0040\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract Critics have interpreted Don Denis’ cantiga Proençaes soen mui bem trobar as a diatribe directed against Occitan troubadours who associated in their poems springtime exordium and song for love. Although some have considered the particular piece of the Portuguese king an aesthetic recreation of the cansós that rejected the début printanier cliché, in this contribution a different reading is proposed. Given that in the entire corpus of the cantigas de amor there is only one text by the Galician clergyman Airas Nunez (Que muito m’eu pago d’este verão) that unites spring, euphoric love, and lyrical activity, this article argues that Don Denis’ poem emerged as a polemic and ironic response to the eccentric verses of his colleague. From the proposed perspective, the king’s cantiga is contextually situated and understood as part of a series of texts that integrate the king and the clergyman’s metaliterary debate on the conception of love.\",\"PeriodicalId\":44119,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"ZEITSCHRIFT FUR ROMANISCHE PHILOLOGIE\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"ZEITSCHRIFT FUR ROMANISCHE PHILOLOGIE\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1515/zrp-2022-0040\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"文学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"N/A\",\"JCRName\":\"LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ZEITSCHRIFT FUR ROMANISCHE PHILOLOGIE","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1515/zrp-2022-0040","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"N/A","JCRName":"LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

唐·丹尼斯的诗作proenaes soen mui bem trobar被评论家解读为对奥克西吟游诗人的抨击,这些吟游诗人在他们的诗歌中将春天的驱魂和爱情之歌联系在一起。虽然有些人认为葡萄牙国王的特殊作品是对cansós的美学再造,但在这篇文章中,提出了一种不同的解读。考虑到在整个《爱情之歌》的语库中,加利西亚牧师艾拉斯·努涅斯(Que muito m ' eu pago d ' este ver o)的一篇文章中,只有一篇将春天、欢快的爱情和抒情活动结合在一起,本文认为唐·丹尼斯的诗是对他同事古怪诗句的一种论战和讽刺回应。从提议的角度来看,国王的悬臂被置于语境中,并被理解为一系列文本的一部分,这些文本整合了国王和牧师关于爱情概念的文学性辩论。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
De amor y primavera: el debate entre don Denis y Airas Nunez
Abstract Critics have interpreted Don Denis’ cantiga Proençaes soen mui bem trobar as a diatribe directed against Occitan troubadours who associated in their poems springtime exordium and song for love. Although some have considered the particular piece of the Portuguese king an aesthetic recreation of the cansós that rejected the début printanier cliché, in this contribution a different reading is proposed. Given that in the entire corpus of the cantigas de amor there is only one text by the Galician clergyman Airas Nunez (Que muito m’eu pago d’este verão) that unites spring, euphoric love, and lyrical activity, this article argues that Don Denis’ poem emerged as a polemic and ironic response to the eccentric verses of his colleague. From the proposed perspective, the king’s cantiga is contextually situated and understood as part of a series of texts that integrate the king and the clergyman’s metaliterary debate on the conception of love.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
53
期刊介绍: The journal Zeitschrift für romanische Philologie (ZrP), was founded in 1877 by Gustav Gröber. In the field of literary history the subjects covered by the journal include Romance literature up to the Renaissance, as well as the entire scope of Romance language studies and related studies.
期刊最新文献
Frontmatter En torno al pseudoanglicismo acuñado por traducción The reflexes of Latin desinential rV in Romanian conjugation as examples of exaptive change La expresión de eventos de movimiento causativos mediante verbos de contacto por impacto en alemán y sus correspondencias en español Comparative reconstruction, phonosymbolism and Romance etymology
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1