啁啾信号L1干扰下大地GNSS仪器的运行

IF 0.4 4区 社会学 Q4 GEOGRAPHY Geodetski Vestnik Pub Date : 2021-01-01 DOI:10.15292/geodetski-vestnik.2021.02.189-204
F. Dimc, P. P. Preseren, M. Bazec
{"title":"啁啾信号L1干扰下大地GNSS仪器的运行","authors":"F. Dimc, P. P. Preseren, M. Bazec","doi":"10.15292/geodetski-vestnik.2021.02.189-204","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper presents the results of a vulnerability test of several geodetic Global Navigation Satellite System (GNSS) receivers in case of intentional signal interference in the frequency L1 for GPS (Global Positioning System). Nine instruments from different manufacturers (i.e., Leica Geosystems AG, Trimble Inc., Javad GNSS) were tested. The test was based on static and kinematic jamming. A static scenario with three-minute interruptions was followed by experiments with a stationary jammer located at distances from 10 m to 160 m from the receivers. For short-term kinematic interference, the jammer was installed in the vehicle, which passed the GNSS instruments at different speeds. An analysis of different scenarios showed that the jammer interrupted GPS but not GLONASS signals in certain situations. Since Galileo was not nominally operational at the time of the July 2019 measurements, only GPS and GLONASS were eligible for the study. The geodetic GNSS instruments reacted to the interruptions with a decreased signal-to-noise-ratio (SNR) and either with a complete inability to determine the code/phase position or with an incorrect calculation of phase ambiguities (initialization), which also affected the quality of the positioning. The proximity of the jammer played the most significant role in the complete inability to receive the signal; however, for the incorrect positioning longer duration of jamming was also a reason.","PeriodicalId":44295,"journal":{"name":"Geodetski Vestnik","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.4000,"publicationDate":"2021-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Operation of geodetic GNSS instruments under chirp signal L1 jamming\",\"authors\":\"F. Dimc, P. P. Preseren, M. Bazec\",\"doi\":\"10.15292/geodetski-vestnik.2021.02.189-204\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This paper presents the results of a vulnerability test of several geodetic Global Navigation Satellite System (GNSS) receivers in case of intentional signal interference in the frequency L1 for GPS (Global Positioning System). Nine instruments from different manufacturers (i.e., Leica Geosystems AG, Trimble Inc., Javad GNSS) were tested. The test was based on static and kinematic jamming. A static scenario with three-minute interruptions was followed by experiments with a stationary jammer located at distances from 10 m to 160 m from the receivers. For short-term kinematic interference, the jammer was installed in the vehicle, which passed the GNSS instruments at different speeds. An analysis of different scenarios showed that the jammer interrupted GPS but not GLONASS signals in certain situations. Since Galileo was not nominally operational at the time of the July 2019 measurements, only GPS and GLONASS were eligible for the study. The geodetic GNSS instruments reacted to the interruptions with a decreased signal-to-noise-ratio (SNR) and either with a complete inability to determine the code/phase position or with an incorrect calculation of phase ambiguities (initialization), which also affected the quality of the positioning. The proximity of the jammer played the most significant role in the complete inability to receive the signal; however, for the incorrect positioning longer duration of jamming was also a reason.\",\"PeriodicalId\":44295,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Geodetski Vestnik\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Geodetski Vestnik\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"90\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.15292/geodetski-vestnik.2021.02.189-204\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"社会学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"GEOGRAPHY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Geodetski Vestnik","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15292/geodetski-vestnik.2021.02.189-204","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"GEOGRAPHY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文介绍了在全球定位系统(GPS) L1频率受到故意信号干扰的情况下,几种大地测量卫星导航系统(GNSS)接收机的脆弱性测试结果。测试了来自不同制造商的9台仪器(即Leica Geosystems AG, Trimble Inc., Javad GNSS)。该测试基于静态和运动干扰。在三分钟中断的静态场景之后,在距离接收器10米至160米的距离上放置一个固定干扰机进行实验。对于短期运动干扰,在车辆中安装干扰器,以不同的速度通过GNSS仪器。对不同情况的分析表明,在某些情况下,干扰器会干扰GPS信号,但不会干扰GLONASS信号。由于伽利略在2019年7月测量时名义上没有运行,因此只有GPS和GLONASS有资格进行研究。大地GNSS仪器对中断的反应是信噪比(SNR)下降,或者完全无法确定代码/相位位置,或者相位模糊(初始化)的计算错误,这也影响了定位的质量。干扰机的距离对完全无法接收信号起了最重要的作用;然而,由于定位不正确,干扰持续时间较长也是一个原因。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Operation of geodetic GNSS instruments under chirp signal L1 jamming
This paper presents the results of a vulnerability test of several geodetic Global Navigation Satellite System (GNSS) receivers in case of intentional signal interference in the frequency L1 for GPS (Global Positioning System). Nine instruments from different manufacturers (i.e., Leica Geosystems AG, Trimble Inc., Javad GNSS) were tested. The test was based on static and kinematic jamming. A static scenario with three-minute interruptions was followed by experiments with a stationary jammer located at distances from 10 m to 160 m from the receivers. For short-term kinematic interference, the jammer was installed in the vehicle, which passed the GNSS instruments at different speeds. An analysis of different scenarios showed that the jammer interrupted GPS but not GLONASS signals in certain situations. Since Galileo was not nominally operational at the time of the July 2019 measurements, only GPS and GLONASS were eligible for the study. The geodetic GNSS instruments reacted to the interruptions with a decreased signal-to-noise-ratio (SNR) and either with a complete inability to determine the code/phase position or with an incorrect calculation of phase ambiguities (initialization), which also affected the quality of the positioning. The proximity of the jammer played the most significant role in the complete inability to receive the signal; however, for the incorrect positioning longer duration of jamming was also a reason.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Geodetski Vestnik
Geodetski Vestnik GEOGRAPHY-
CiteScore
1.00
自引率
33.30%
发文量
10
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊介绍: Zveza geodetov Slovenije v skladu s svojim poslanstvom in s svojim statutom, izdaja znanstveno, strokovno in informativno glasilo Geodetski vestnik. Izhaja v nakladi 1200 izvodov. Objavlja znanstvene, strokovne in poljudno strokovne prispevke ter informacije. Revija je dostopna v večjem številu sekundarnih podatkovnih baz po svetu in mnogih knjižnicah. Od leta 2008 je vključena v Thomson Scientific bazo podatkov SCI. Cena izvoda revije je za nečlane 17 Evrov.
期刊最新文献
Graph-based analysis of the correlation between mobility and telecommunication Redevelopment of a manufacturing factory in an energy generation plant with wood biomass Modified method of deformation analysis according to the Munich approach Determining phenological phases of selected tree species with MODIS time-series data Triangle-based Horizontal Geodetic Datum Transformations in Bosnia and Herzegovina
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1