利益相关者识别和显著采购:来自英国医院的实证研究

IF 0.4 Q4 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES International Journal of Healthcare Technology and Management Pub Date : 2019-01-01 DOI:10.1504/ijhtm.2019.10026698
C. Papanagnou, Pearce Madhlambudzi
{"title":"利益相关者识别和显著采购:来自英国医院的实证研究","authors":"C. Papanagnou, Pearce Madhlambudzi","doi":"10.1504/ijhtm.2019.10026698","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The lack of systematic processes for stakeholder identification and the omission of key stakeholders in UK hospitals cause significant delays in purchasing processes. This is reinforced by the strict tender processes that follow in making their purchases as a matter of assurance of fairness and competition. This paper presents a descriptive analysis of decision-making processes when the public hospitals purchase diagnostic equipment and it discovers how the hospitals use stakeholder identification and salience during the purchase of diagnostic equipment. With the aid of purposeful case studies and semi-structured interviews, we explore how stakeholder salience is concentrated on the administrative personnel who have the role to implement organisational policy and on technical experts who make sure that the right equipment is bought. Last, this study provides an insight into how stakeholder groups share the premises of the public hospitals' decision-making process by considering the attributes of power, urgency, legitimacy and proximity.","PeriodicalId":51933,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Healthcare Technology and Management","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.4000,"publicationDate":"2019-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Stakeholder identification and salience in purchasing: an empirical study from UK hospitals\",\"authors\":\"C. Papanagnou, Pearce Madhlambudzi\",\"doi\":\"10.1504/ijhtm.2019.10026698\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The lack of systematic processes for stakeholder identification and the omission of key stakeholders in UK hospitals cause significant delays in purchasing processes. This is reinforced by the strict tender processes that follow in making their purchases as a matter of assurance of fairness and competition. This paper presents a descriptive analysis of decision-making processes when the public hospitals purchase diagnostic equipment and it discovers how the hospitals use stakeholder identification and salience during the purchase of diagnostic equipment. With the aid of purposeful case studies and semi-structured interviews, we explore how stakeholder salience is concentrated on the administrative personnel who have the role to implement organisational policy and on technical experts who make sure that the right equipment is bought. Last, this study provides an insight into how stakeholder groups share the premises of the public hospitals' decision-making process by considering the attributes of power, urgency, legitimacy and proximity.\",\"PeriodicalId\":51933,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Healthcare Technology and Management\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"4\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Healthcare Technology and Management\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1504/ijhtm.2019.10026698\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Healthcare Technology and Management","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1504/ijhtm.2019.10026698","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

摘要

在英国医院,由于缺乏识别利益相关者的系统流程以及主要利益相关者的遗漏,导致采购过程出现严重延误。为了保证公平和竞争,他们在采购时遵循严格的招标程序,这一点得到了加强。本文对公立医院购买诊断设备的决策过程进行了描述性分析,发现医院在购买诊断设备时如何使用利益相关者识别和显著性。在有目的的案例研究和半结构化访谈的帮助下,我们探讨了利益相关者如何将注意力集中在执行组织政策的行政人员和确保购买正确设备的技术专家身上。最后,本研究通过考虑权力、紧迫性、合法性和接近性的属性,深入了解了利益相关者群体如何共享公立医院决策过程的前提。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Stakeholder identification and salience in purchasing: an empirical study from UK hospitals
The lack of systematic processes for stakeholder identification and the omission of key stakeholders in UK hospitals cause significant delays in purchasing processes. This is reinforced by the strict tender processes that follow in making their purchases as a matter of assurance of fairness and competition. This paper presents a descriptive analysis of decision-making processes when the public hospitals purchase diagnostic equipment and it discovers how the hospitals use stakeholder identification and salience during the purchase of diagnostic equipment. With the aid of purposeful case studies and semi-structured interviews, we explore how stakeholder salience is concentrated on the administrative personnel who have the role to implement organisational policy and on technical experts who make sure that the right equipment is bought. Last, this study provides an insight into how stakeholder groups share the premises of the public hospitals' decision-making process by considering the attributes of power, urgency, legitimacy and proximity.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.00
自引率
10.00%
发文量
10
期刊介绍: IJHTM is a new series emerging from the International Journal of Technology Management. It provides an international forum and refereed authoritative sources of information in the fields of management, economics and the management of technology in healthcare.
期刊最新文献
Resource management for full paying patient service in Malaysia: issues and challenges Sustainable healthcare information exchanges network design: a scenario-based planning approach Intentional non-compliance: influencing employees' compliance decision in healthcare services Medical device industry in Iran: key driving forces of domestic production up to 2040 The stent for life initiative in Portugal: a critical realist perspective
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1