多重PCR与血液培养物鉴定血液感染患者微生物的比较

B. Eduardo, Corona-Nava Ana Karen, Martínez-Orozco José Arturo, Flores-Perez Elia Maria, Jimenez-Martinez Maria Elena, Mireles-Davalos Christian Daniel, S. Ángel, Ruiz Santillán Danna Patricia, Santillan Segura Francisco Javier
{"title":"多重PCR与血液培养物鉴定血液感染患者微生物的比较","authors":"B. Eduardo, Corona-Nava Ana Karen, Martínez-Orozco José Arturo, Flores-Perez Elia Maria, Jimenez-Martinez Maria Elena, Mireles-Davalos Christian Daniel, S. Ángel, Ruiz Santillán Danna Patricia, Santillan Segura Francisco Javier","doi":"10.15406/jmen.2019.07.00269","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Blood Stream Infections (BSI) represent an important cause of morbidity and mortality worldwide. Most treatment decisions in these cases are made taking into consideration the results of blood cultures, which has been the most important diagnostic procedure to identify the causal agent when there is a clinical suspicion of BSI. However, there is a significant delay in results when conventional methods like these are performed.1 This diagnostic method, based on the isolation of a microorganism and its identification and susceptibility test using standard biochemical techniques, is a process that can generally take from 48 to 72 hrs, and whose performance is variable. If 2 to 4 samples are obtained (40 to 80 ml of blood) before starting antimicrobial treatment, an etiological agent is detected in 80 to 96% of cases.2 In patients with bacteremia, which frequently causes sepsis and septic shock, an early and appropriate administration of antimicrobial treatments affects directly in the patient’s prognosis.3,4 an inadequate treatment can duplicate mortality, which also increases a 7,6% each hour that therapy adjustment is delayed.5,6","PeriodicalId":91326,"journal":{"name":"Journal of microbiology & experimentation","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparison of multiplex PCR against blood cultures for the identification of microorganisms in a cohort of patients with bloodstream infections \",\"authors\":\"B. Eduardo, Corona-Nava Ana Karen, Martínez-Orozco José Arturo, Flores-Perez Elia Maria, Jimenez-Martinez Maria Elena, Mireles-Davalos Christian Daniel, S. Ángel, Ruiz Santillán Danna Patricia, Santillan Segura Francisco Javier\",\"doi\":\"10.15406/jmen.2019.07.00269\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Blood Stream Infections (BSI) represent an important cause of morbidity and mortality worldwide. Most treatment decisions in these cases are made taking into consideration the results of blood cultures, which has been the most important diagnostic procedure to identify the causal agent when there is a clinical suspicion of BSI. However, there is a significant delay in results when conventional methods like these are performed.1 This diagnostic method, based on the isolation of a microorganism and its identification and susceptibility test using standard biochemical techniques, is a process that can generally take from 48 to 72 hrs, and whose performance is variable. If 2 to 4 samples are obtained (40 to 80 ml of blood) before starting antimicrobial treatment, an etiological agent is detected in 80 to 96% of cases.2 In patients with bacteremia, which frequently causes sepsis and septic shock, an early and appropriate administration of antimicrobial treatments affects directly in the patient’s prognosis.3,4 an inadequate treatment can duplicate mortality, which also increases a 7,6% each hour that therapy adjustment is delayed.5,6\",\"PeriodicalId\":91326,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of microbiology & experimentation\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of microbiology & experimentation\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.15406/jmen.2019.07.00269\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of microbiology & experimentation","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15406/jmen.2019.07.00269","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

血流感染(BSI)是世界范围内发病率和死亡率的重要原因。在这些病例中,大多数治疗决定都要考虑到血培养的结果,这是临床上怀疑BSI时确定病因的最重要的诊断程序。然而,当使用这些传统方法时,结果会有明显的延迟这种诊断方法基于微生物的分离及其鉴定和使用标准生化技术的敏感性试验,该过程通常需要48至72小时,其性能是可变的。如果在开始抗微生物治疗之前获得2至4个样本(40至80毫升血液),则在80%至96%的病例中检测到病原体对于经常引起败血症和感染性休克的菌血症患者,早期适当给予抗菌药物治疗直接影响患者的预后。不适当的治疗可以重复死亡率,这也使治疗调整延迟每小时增加7.6%
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Comparison of multiplex PCR against blood cultures for the identification of microorganisms in a cohort of patients with bloodstream infections 
Blood Stream Infections (BSI) represent an important cause of morbidity and mortality worldwide. Most treatment decisions in these cases are made taking into consideration the results of blood cultures, which has been the most important diagnostic procedure to identify the causal agent when there is a clinical suspicion of BSI. However, there is a significant delay in results when conventional methods like these are performed.1 This diagnostic method, based on the isolation of a microorganism and its identification and susceptibility test using standard biochemical techniques, is a process that can generally take from 48 to 72 hrs, and whose performance is variable. If 2 to 4 samples are obtained (40 to 80 ml of blood) before starting antimicrobial treatment, an etiological agent is detected in 80 to 96% of cases.2 In patients with bacteremia, which frequently causes sepsis and septic shock, an early and appropriate administration of antimicrobial treatments affects directly in the patient’s prognosis.3,4 an inadequate treatment can duplicate mortality, which also increases a 7,6% each hour that therapy adjustment is delayed.5,6
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Loss of control of the pandemic during vaccination in Uruguay Nodular periorbital dirofilariasis in a child in Romania: case report Acinetobacter baumannii, a global health-threatening bacterium: a short review Pandemic parameters: history revisited Nasal carriage of Staphylococcus aureus among a healthy suburban population: genotypic diversity and frequency of pathogenicity genes
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1