高等英语专业学生使用的语言学习策略类型

Q2 Social Sciences Teflin Journal Pub Date : 2015-09-09 DOI:10.15639/TEFLINJOURNAL.V26I1/17-35
Tan Khye Chuin, Sarjit Kaur
{"title":"高等英语专业学生使用的语言学习策略类型","authors":"Tan Khye Chuin, Sarjit Kaur","doi":"10.15639/TEFLINJOURNAL.V26I1/17-35","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This study investigated the types of language learning strategies used by 73 English majors from the School of Humanities in Universiti Sains Malaysia. Using questionnaires adopted from Oxford’s (1990) Strategy Inventory of Language Learning (SILL) and focus group interviews, the study also examined the English major students’ perceptions of using language learning strategies while learning English. The results revealed that the English majors were generally high users of all six types of language learning strategies. The English majors were reported to use metacognitive strategies the most. The least preferred strategies among the English majors were memory strategies. Some of the students’ perceptions were positive as they perceived that language learning strategies developed their language competency and required a conscious and deliberate effort. Conversely, some negative perceptions illustrate that students had low awareness of language learning strategies and they believed that language learning strategies did not develop language competency and the usage did not require conscious effort. Research in this field should not cease from exploration in order to contribute towards the development of self-regulated language learners who have problem solving skills and are able to take control of their learning process.","PeriodicalId":37036,"journal":{"name":"Teflin Journal","volume":"26 1","pages":"17-35"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2015-09-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"19","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"TYPES OF LANGUAGE LEARNING STRATEGIES USED BY TERTIARY ENGLISH MAJORS\",\"authors\":\"Tan Khye Chuin, Sarjit Kaur\",\"doi\":\"10.15639/TEFLINJOURNAL.V26I1/17-35\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This study investigated the types of language learning strategies used by 73 English majors from the School of Humanities in Universiti Sains Malaysia. Using questionnaires adopted from Oxford’s (1990) Strategy Inventory of Language Learning (SILL) and focus group interviews, the study also examined the English major students’ perceptions of using language learning strategies while learning English. The results revealed that the English majors were generally high users of all six types of language learning strategies. The English majors were reported to use metacognitive strategies the most. The least preferred strategies among the English majors were memory strategies. Some of the students’ perceptions were positive as they perceived that language learning strategies developed their language competency and required a conscious and deliberate effort. Conversely, some negative perceptions illustrate that students had low awareness of language learning strategies and they believed that language learning strategies did not develop language competency and the usage did not require conscious effort. Research in this field should not cease from exploration in order to contribute towards the development of self-regulated language learners who have problem solving skills and are able to take control of their learning process.\",\"PeriodicalId\":37036,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Teflin Journal\",\"volume\":\"26 1\",\"pages\":\"17-35\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2015-09-09\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"19\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Teflin Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.15639/TEFLINJOURNAL.V26I1/17-35\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"Social Sciences\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Teflin Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15639/TEFLINJOURNAL.V26I1/17-35","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 19

摘要

本研究调查了马来西亚理科大学人文学院73名英语专业学生使用的语言学习策略类型。本研究采用牛津大学(1990)语言学习策略量表(strategic Inventory of Language Learning, SILL)的问卷调查和焦点小组访谈,考察了英语专业学生在学习英语时使用语言学习策略的看法。结果显示,英语专业学生普遍高度使用这六种语言学习策略。据报道,英语专业学生使用元认知策略最多。英语专业学生最不喜欢的策略是记忆策略。一些学生的看法是积极的,因为他们认为语言学习策略可以提高他们的语言能力,需要有意识和深思熟虑的努力。相反,一些消极的看法说明学生对语言学习策略的认识不高,他们认为语言学习策略不能培养语言能力,使用语言学习策略不需要有意识的努力。这一领域的研究不应停止探索,以促进具有解决问题能力和能够控制自己学习过程的自我调节语言学习者的发展。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
TYPES OF LANGUAGE LEARNING STRATEGIES USED BY TERTIARY ENGLISH MAJORS
This study investigated the types of language learning strategies used by 73 English majors from the School of Humanities in Universiti Sains Malaysia. Using questionnaires adopted from Oxford’s (1990) Strategy Inventory of Language Learning (SILL) and focus group interviews, the study also examined the English major students’ perceptions of using language learning strategies while learning English. The results revealed that the English majors were generally high users of all six types of language learning strategies. The English majors were reported to use metacognitive strategies the most. The least preferred strategies among the English majors were memory strategies. Some of the students’ perceptions were positive as they perceived that language learning strategies developed their language competency and required a conscious and deliberate effort. Conversely, some negative perceptions illustrate that students had low awareness of language learning strategies and they believed that language learning strategies did not develop language competency and the usage did not require conscious effort. Research in this field should not cease from exploration in order to contribute towards the development of self-regulated language learners who have problem solving skills and are able to take control of their learning process.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Teflin Journal
Teflin Journal Social Sciences-Linguistics and Language
CiteScore
1.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
9
审稿时长
20 weeks
期刊最新文献
L2 CONFIDENCE DEVELOPMENT OF ELF INTERNATIONAL STUDENTS IN TAIWAN EQUIVALENCY EVIDENCE OF THE ENGLISH COMPETENCY TEST ACROSS DIFFERENT MODES: A RASCH ANALYSIS THE USE OF CHATGPT IN ACADEMIC WRITING: A BLESSING OR A CURSE IN DISGUISE? INDIVIDUALIZED GUIDANCE TO EMPOWER AN L2 LEARNER WITH AUTISM SPECTRUM DISORDER IN ACADEMIC ESSAY WRITING EMBRACING SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT GOALS CRITICALLY TO EXPLORE LIFE PURPOSES IN ENGLISH LANGUAGE TEACHER EDUCATION
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1