针对独立老年人的简易下半身功能表现问卷(Brief- lbfpq)

Q4 Medicine Fisioterapia em Movimento Pub Date : 2023-05-08 DOI:10.1590/fm.2023.36111
N. Iosimuta, R. C. Freire Júnior, J. Porto, D. Abreu
{"title":"针对独立老年人的简易下半身功能表现问卷(Brief- lbfpq)","authors":"N. Iosimuta, R. C. Freire Júnior, J. Porto, D. Abreu","doi":"10.1590/fm.2023.36111","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Introduction The literature still lacks evidence about patient-reported outcome measures to fast screen the reduced physical performance of the lower body in older adults to be applied in any clinical setting as primary health care or without specific instruments in prevention campaigns, or even easy to be applied by phone. Objective: To develop a brief questionnaire to screen the lower body functional performance in community-dwelling older adults and to validate this new questionnaire with objective clinical tests. Methods A convenience sampling of 221 community-dwelling older adults was included in this cross-sectional study. The validity between Brief-LBFPQ and objective tests such as gait speed, Timed-Up and Go test (TUG), 5-Time Stand-to-Sit test (5TSST), and step test were assessed by multinominal logistic regression. Internal consistency was determined using Cronbach’s alpha and Test-retest reliability was determined using intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) for numeral scale and Cohen’s Kappa for ordinal scale. Results Brief-LBFPQ was significantly associated with objective tests. All eight items from Brief-LBFPQ presented an absolute agreement with ICCs values above 0.7. Kappa values of Brief-LBFPQ items ranged from 0.6 to 0.83, showing substantial agreement and perfect agreement. Conclusion Brief-LBFPQ could be very useful in general clinic settings as it provides earlier screening of functional impairment in independent older adults, and consequently may allow an earlier intervention approach.","PeriodicalId":33749,"journal":{"name":"Fisioterapia em Movimento","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-05-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Brief Lower Body Functional Performance Questionnaire (Brief-LBFPQ) for independent older adults\",\"authors\":\"N. Iosimuta, R. C. Freire Júnior, J. Porto, D. Abreu\",\"doi\":\"10.1590/fm.2023.36111\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract Introduction The literature still lacks evidence about patient-reported outcome measures to fast screen the reduced physical performance of the lower body in older adults to be applied in any clinical setting as primary health care or without specific instruments in prevention campaigns, or even easy to be applied by phone. Objective: To develop a brief questionnaire to screen the lower body functional performance in community-dwelling older adults and to validate this new questionnaire with objective clinical tests. Methods A convenience sampling of 221 community-dwelling older adults was included in this cross-sectional study. The validity between Brief-LBFPQ and objective tests such as gait speed, Timed-Up and Go test (TUG), 5-Time Stand-to-Sit test (5TSST), and step test were assessed by multinominal logistic regression. Internal consistency was determined using Cronbach’s alpha and Test-retest reliability was determined using intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) for numeral scale and Cohen’s Kappa for ordinal scale. Results Brief-LBFPQ was significantly associated with objective tests. All eight items from Brief-LBFPQ presented an absolute agreement with ICCs values above 0.7. Kappa values of Brief-LBFPQ items ranged from 0.6 to 0.83, showing substantial agreement and perfect agreement. Conclusion Brief-LBFPQ could be very useful in general clinic settings as it provides earlier screening of functional impairment in independent older adults, and consequently may allow an earlier intervention approach.\",\"PeriodicalId\":33749,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Fisioterapia em Movimento\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-05-08\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Fisioterapia em Movimento\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1590/fm.2023.36111\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Fisioterapia em Movimento","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1590/fm.2023.36111","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

文献仍然缺乏证据表明,患者报告的结果测量方法可以快速筛查老年人下半身身体机能下降,作为初级卫生保健或在预防运动中没有特定仪器的任何临床环境中应用,甚至容易通过电话应用。目的:编制一份用于筛查社区老年人下肢功能表现的简短问卷,并通过客观的临床试验对该问卷进行验证。方法采用方便抽样的方法对221名居住在社区的老年人进行横断面研究。采用多项logistic回归评估Brief-LBFPQ与客观测试如步态速度、计时行走测试(TUG)、5次站坐测试(5TSST)、步进测试的效度。内部一致性采用Cronbach’s alpha测定,重测信度采用数量表内相关系数(ICC)测定,序数量表采用Cohen’s Kappa测定。结果Brief-LBFPQ与客观测试有显著相关性。Brief-LBFPQ的8个项目均与0.7以上的ICCs值绝对一致。Brief-LBFPQ的Kappa值在0.6 ~ 0.83之间,基本一致和完全一致。结论Brief-LBFPQ在一般临床环境中非常有用,因为它提供了独立老年人功能障碍的早期筛查,因此可能允许早期干预方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Brief Lower Body Functional Performance Questionnaire (Brief-LBFPQ) for independent older adults
Abstract Introduction The literature still lacks evidence about patient-reported outcome measures to fast screen the reduced physical performance of the lower body in older adults to be applied in any clinical setting as primary health care or without specific instruments in prevention campaigns, or even easy to be applied by phone. Objective: To develop a brief questionnaire to screen the lower body functional performance in community-dwelling older adults and to validate this new questionnaire with objective clinical tests. Methods A convenience sampling of 221 community-dwelling older adults was included in this cross-sectional study. The validity between Brief-LBFPQ and objective tests such as gait speed, Timed-Up and Go test (TUG), 5-Time Stand-to-Sit test (5TSST), and step test were assessed by multinominal logistic regression. Internal consistency was determined using Cronbach’s alpha and Test-retest reliability was determined using intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) for numeral scale and Cohen’s Kappa for ordinal scale. Results Brief-LBFPQ was significantly associated with objective tests. All eight items from Brief-LBFPQ presented an absolute agreement with ICCs values above 0.7. Kappa values of Brief-LBFPQ items ranged from 0.6 to 0.83, showing substantial agreement and perfect agreement. Conclusion Brief-LBFPQ could be very useful in general clinic settings as it provides earlier screening of functional impairment in independent older adults, and consequently may allow an earlier intervention approach.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Fisioterapia em Movimento
Fisioterapia em Movimento Health Professions-Complementary and Manual Therapy
CiteScore
0.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
78
审稿时长
13 weeks
期刊最新文献
Engineering extracellular vesicles with macrophage membrane fusion for ameliorating imiquimod-induced psoriatic skin inflammation. elessaúde na atenção fisioterapêutica durante a pandemia de COVID-19: um relato de experiência Aquatic physical therapy effects on cardiorespiratory variables in Parkinson's disease Intrinsic foot strengthening and electrostimulation in older adults - Randomized clinical trial Do final rehabilitation volumes influence function after anterior cross ligament reconstruction? A pilot study
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1