解释跨性别恐惧症和对跨性别者的歧视:理论方法综述

Q4 Psychology Psicologia e Sociedade Pub Date : 2020-01-01 DOI:10.1590/1807-0310/2020v32190274
Sara Aguirre-Sánchez-Beato
{"title":"解释跨性别恐惧症和对跨性别者的歧视:理论方法综述","authors":"Sara Aguirre-Sánchez-Beato","doi":"10.1590/1807-0310/2020v32190274","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Transphobia and discrimination against trans people are widespread. In view of growing scientific interest in understanding this type of discrimination and considering that scientific knowledge shapes the way a phenomenon is understood and addressed, this paper aims at identifying theoretical perspectives and categories used in contemporary scientific research (2005-2016) to explain discrimination against trans people. A review of literature and a qualitative content analysis of the selected documents (N = 68) were carried out. Two broad theoretical perspectives were identified: cognitive approaches and discursive approaches. The limitations of the two approaches are discussed in terms of how the problem of transphobia and discrimination is framed and explained and the scope for action offered. To overcome such limitations, a conceptual distinction between gendered practices and transphobic attitudes and ideology is suggested and an alternative theoretical proposal using discursive psychology is presented.","PeriodicalId":35367,"journal":{"name":"Psicologia e Sociedade","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"EXPLAINING TRANSPHOBIA AND DISCRIMINATION AGAINST TRANS PEOPLE: A REVIEW OF THEORETICAL APPROACHES\",\"authors\":\"Sara Aguirre-Sánchez-Beato\",\"doi\":\"10.1590/1807-0310/2020v32190274\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract Transphobia and discrimination against trans people are widespread. In view of growing scientific interest in understanding this type of discrimination and considering that scientific knowledge shapes the way a phenomenon is understood and addressed, this paper aims at identifying theoretical perspectives and categories used in contemporary scientific research (2005-2016) to explain discrimination against trans people. A review of literature and a qualitative content analysis of the selected documents (N = 68) were carried out. Two broad theoretical perspectives were identified: cognitive approaches and discursive approaches. The limitations of the two approaches are discussed in terms of how the problem of transphobia and discrimination is framed and explained and the scope for action offered. To overcome such limitations, a conceptual distinction between gendered practices and transphobic attitudes and ideology is suggested and an alternative theoretical proposal using discursive psychology is presented.\",\"PeriodicalId\":35367,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Psicologia e Sociedade\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Psicologia e Sociedade\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1590/1807-0310/2020v32190274\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"Psychology\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Psicologia e Sociedade","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1590/1807-0310/2020v32190274","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Psychology","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

跨性别恐惧症和对跨性别者的歧视普遍存在。鉴于科学对理解这类歧视的兴趣日益浓厚,并考虑到科学知识塑造了理解和解决现象的方式,本文旨在确定当代科学研究(2005-2016)中用于解释对跨性别者歧视的理论视角和类别。对所选文献(N = 68)进行文献回顾和定性内容分析。两种广泛的理论视角被确定:认知方法和话语方法。讨论了这两种方法的局限性,包括如何界定和解释跨性别恐惧症和歧视问题,以及提供的行动范围。为了克服这些限制,建议在性别实践和跨性别态度和意识形态之间进行概念区分,并提出了使用话语心理学的替代理论建议。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
EXPLAINING TRANSPHOBIA AND DISCRIMINATION AGAINST TRANS PEOPLE: A REVIEW OF THEORETICAL APPROACHES
Abstract Transphobia and discrimination against trans people are widespread. In view of growing scientific interest in understanding this type of discrimination and considering that scientific knowledge shapes the way a phenomenon is understood and addressed, this paper aims at identifying theoretical perspectives and categories used in contemporary scientific research (2005-2016) to explain discrimination against trans people. A review of literature and a qualitative content analysis of the selected documents (N = 68) were carried out. Two broad theoretical perspectives were identified: cognitive approaches and discursive approaches. The limitations of the two approaches are discussed in terms of how the problem of transphobia and discrimination is framed and explained and the scope for action offered. To overcome such limitations, a conceptual distinction between gendered practices and transphobic attitudes and ideology is suggested and an alternative theoretical proposal using discursive psychology is presented.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Psicologia e Sociedade
Psicologia e Sociedade Psychology-Social Psychology
CiteScore
0.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
7
审稿时长
36 weeks
期刊介绍: The proposal of Psicologia & Sociedade is to publish original articles on themes that privilege research psychology and society, aiming at the development of Social Psychology in a critical, transforming and interdisciplinary perspective. Psicologia & Sociedade publishes a) research reports, b) theoretical studies, c) critical literature reviews, d) book reviews, e) interviews and f) translations. In cases of actual comproved academic and/or scientific innovationinnovations, reports of professional experiences (description of procedures and strategies, or case studies) and technical notes (description of instruments and original research techniques) are also accepted.
期刊最新文献
VOZES CAROLINAS: UM OLHAR INTERSECCIONAL SOBRE MEMÓRIAS E NARRATIVAS DE MULHERES NEGRAS PERSPECTIVAS INDÍGENAS ANTIRRACISTAS SOBRE O ETNOGENOCÍDIO: CONTRIBUIÇÕES PARA O REFLORESTAMENTO DO IMAGINÁRIO “HOJE EU SEI”: EXPERIÊNCIAS RACIALIZADAS COM DOCENTES E PESQUISADORES DA PSICOLOGIA SOCIAL ESTADO, RACISMO E AÇÕES AFIRMATIVAS PARA PROMOÇÃO DA IGUALDADE RACIAL: DILEMAS NO CAPITALISMO A SOCIOGENIA FANONIANA E A FORMAÇÃO EM PSICOLOGIA: UMA APOSTA CLÍNICA POLÍTICA E NEGRA
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1