巴西体育部公共政策管理

Dirceu Santos Silva, C. F. Borges, S. Amaral
{"title":"巴西体育部公共政策管理","authors":"Dirceu Santos Silva, C. F. Borges, S. Amaral","doi":"10.1590/1807-55092015000100065","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The purpose of this article was to discuss the political actions of the Ministry of Sports in the fields of sports and leisure. For this purpose, a document research was performed, followed by analysis of the content of legislation and documents that govern the policies of the Ministry of Sports. Three main categories emerged in this analysis: management model, concept of social law and channels of participation. The results indicated that public policies the political actions approach managerial public management, considering social rights as services to be rendered by the State. Furthermore, the participation of civil society only occurred in an institutionalized manner through the National Council of Sport and the National Conferences of Sport (CNEs -Conferencias Nacionais de Esporte). Ambiguously, actions were also identified that promoted a societal view, expanding the understanding of leisure and affirming it as a social right. However, in recent years these actions have been subsumed by the managerial view.","PeriodicalId":30354,"journal":{"name":"Revista Brasileira de Educacao Fisica e Esporte RBEFE","volume":"29 1","pages":"65-79"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2015-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1590/1807-55092015000100065","citationCount":"16","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Gestão das políticas públicas do Ministério do Esporte do Brasil\",\"authors\":\"Dirceu Santos Silva, C. F. Borges, S. Amaral\",\"doi\":\"10.1590/1807-55092015000100065\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The purpose of this article was to discuss the political actions of the Ministry of Sports in the fields of sports and leisure. For this purpose, a document research was performed, followed by analysis of the content of legislation and documents that govern the policies of the Ministry of Sports. Three main categories emerged in this analysis: management model, concept of social law and channels of participation. The results indicated that public policies the political actions approach managerial public management, considering social rights as services to be rendered by the State. Furthermore, the participation of civil society only occurred in an institutionalized manner through the National Council of Sport and the National Conferences of Sport (CNEs -Conferencias Nacionais de Esporte). Ambiguously, actions were also identified that promoted a societal view, expanding the understanding of leisure and affirming it as a social right. However, in recent years these actions have been subsumed by the managerial view.\",\"PeriodicalId\":30354,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Revista Brasileira de Educacao Fisica e Esporte RBEFE\",\"volume\":\"29 1\",\"pages\":\"65-79\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2015-03-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1590/1807-55092015000100065\",\"citationCount\":\"16\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Revista Brasileira de Educacao Fisica e Esporte RBEFE\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1590/1807-55092015000100065\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Revista Brasileira de Educacao Fisica e Esporte RBEFE","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1590/1807-55092015000100065","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 16

摘要

本文的目的是讨论体育部在体育和休闲领域的政治行动。为此目的,进行了文件研究,然后分析了立法和指导体育部政策的文件的内容。在分析过程中出现了三个主要范畴:管理模式、社会法概念和参与渠道。结果表明,公共政策和政治行动接近管理公共管理,将社会权利视为由国家提供的服务。此外,民间社会的参与只能通过国家体育委员会和国家体育会议(CNEs -Conferencias Nacionais de Esporte)以制度化的方式进行。含糊不清的是,还确定了促进社会观点的行动,扩大了对休闲的理解,并确认休闲是一项社会权利。然而,近年来,这些行为已被纳入管理观点。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Gestão das políticas públicas do Ministério do Esporte do Brasil
The purpose of this article was to discuss the political actions of the Ministry of Sports in the fields of sports and leisure. For this purpose, a document research was performed, followed by analysis of the content of legislation and documents that govern the policies of the Ministry of Sports. Three main categories emerged in this analysis: management model, concept of social law and channels of participation. The results indicated that public policies the political actions approach managerial public management, considering social rights as services to be rendered by the State. Furthermore, the participation of civil society only occurred in an institutionalized manner through the National Council of Sport and the National Conferences of Sport (CNEs -Conferencias Nacionais de Esporte). Ambiguously, actions were also identified that promoted a societal view, expanding the understanding of leisure and affirming it as a social right. However, in recent years these actions have been subsumed by the managerial view.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
1
审稿时长
16 weeks
期刊最新文献
Do Code of Points in men artistic gymnastics and women artistic gymnastics favor asymmetric elements Força explosiva de membros inferiores em ginastas da ginástica rítmica de diferentes níveis competitivos Insatisfação corporal e fatores sociodemográficos, antropométricos e maturacionais de atletas de ginástica artística Prevalência de lesões na ginástica artística masculina de alto rendimento Variáveis cinemáticas do salto sobre a mesa na ginástica artística
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1