回归本源:个人在组织创造力中的重要性

Q4 Business, Management and Accounting RAC Revista de Administracao Contemporanea Pub Date : 2016-10-01 DOI:10.1590/1982-7849RAC2016150096
Jorge F. S. Gomes, A. Rodrigues, Ana C. A. Veloso
{"title":"回归本源:个人在组织创造力中的重要性","authors":"Jorge F. S. Gomes, A. Rodrigues, Ana C. A. Veloso","doi":"10.1590/1982-7849RAC2016150096","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The goal of the current text is to highlight the role of the individual in creativity in organisations. This role has been strangely disregarded in recent years, as modern accounts of creativity have been emphasising the idea that creativity is only defined in context. This main stream argues that creativity is a process that essentially occurs within a functional, relational, and organisational context in which workers are inserted. Key authors defending such a position include the likes of Amabile (1996), Csikszentmihalyi (1996), and, more recently, Glăveanu (2010a, 2010b). This is a vision rooted in the psychosocial interactionist perspective, which has also had a considerable impact in other areas in psychology, sociology, management and other social and human sciences. This supremacy, with regards to creativity, has led many to forget the role of the individual person in the creative process and output, removing their responsibility and protagonism for generating and producing ideas. Hence, the current text intends to bring back to discussion the individual bases of creativity, that people can have an existence isolated from external influences, further defending that the concept can and should be defined out of context, rather than in context.","PeriodicalId":53246,"journal":{"name":"RAC Revista de Administracao Contemporanea","volume":"20 1","pages":"568-589"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1590/1982-7849RAC2016150096","citationCount":"8","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Regresso às Origens: A Importância do Indivíduo na Criatividade nas Organizações\",\"authors\":\"Jorge F. S. Gomes, A. Rodrigues, Ana C. A. Veloso\",\"doi\":\"10.1590/1982-7849RAC2016150096\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The goal of the current text is to highlight the role of the individual in creativity in organisations. This role has been strangely disregarded in recent years, as modern accounts of creativity have been emphasising the idea that creativity is only defined in context. This main stream argues that creativity is a process that essentially occurs within a functional, relational, and organisational context in which workers are inserted. Key authors defending such a position include the likes of Amabile (1996), Csikszentmihalyi (1996), and, more recently, Glăveanu (2010a, 2010b). This is a vision rooted in the psychosocial interactionist perspective, which has also had a considerable impact in other areas in psychology, sociology, management and other social and human sciences. This supremacy, with regards to creativity, has led many to forget the role of the individual person in the creative process and output, removing their responsibility and protagonism for generating and producing ideas. Hence, the current text intends to bring back to discussion the individual bases of creativity, that people can have an existence isolated from external influences, further defending that the concept can and should be defined out of context, rather than in context.\",\"PeriodicalId\":53246,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"RAC Revista de Administracao Contemporanea\",\"volume\":\"20 1\",\"pages\":\"568-589\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2016-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1590/1982-7849RAC2016150096\",\"citationCount\":\"8\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"RAC Revista de Administracao Contemporanea\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1590/1982-7849RAC2016150096\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"Business, Management and Accounting\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"RAC Revista de Administracao Contemporanea","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1590/1982-7849RAC2016150096","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Business, Management and Accounting","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 8

摘要

当前文本的目标是突出个人在组织创造力中的作用。近年来,这一角色被奇怪地忽视了,因为现代对创造力的描述一直强调创造力只能在语境中定义。这一主流观点认为,创造力本质上是一个过程,发生在一个功能的、关系的和组织的背景下,员工被插入其中。捍卫这一立场的主要作者包括Amabile (1996), Csikszentmihalyi(1996),以及最近的glaloveanu (2010a, 2010b)。这是一种植根于社会心理互动主义观点的愿景,它在心理学、社会学、管理学以及其他社会和人文科学的其他领域也产生了相当大的影响。在创造力方面,这种至高无上的地位导致许多人忘记了个人在创造性过程和产出中的作用,消除了他们在产生和产生思想方面的责任和主导作用。因此,本文打算重新讨论创造力的个人基础,即人们可以独立于外部影响而存在,进一步捍卫这个概念可以而且应该脱离上下文来定义,而不是在上下文中定义。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Regresso às Origens: A Importância do Indivíduo na Criatividade nas Organizações
The goal of the current text is to highlight the role of the individual in creativity in organisations. This role has been strangely disregarded in recent years, as modern accounts of creativity have been emphasising the idea that creativity is only defined in context. This main stream argues that creativity is a process that essentially occurs within a functional, relational, and organisational context in which workers are inserted. Key authors defending such a position include the likes of Amabile (1996), Csikszentmihalyi (1996), and, more recently, Glăveanu (2010a, 2010b). This is a vision rooted in the psychosocial interactionist perspective, which has also had a considerable impact in other areas in psychology, sociology, management and other social and human sciences. This supremacy, with regards to creativity, has led many to forget the role of the individual person in the creative process and output, removing their responsibility and protagonism for generating and producing ideas. Hence, the current text intends to bring back to discussion the individual bases of creativity, that people can have an existence isolated from external influences, further defending that the concept can and should be defined out of context, rather than in context.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
70
审稿时长
20 weeks
期刊最新文献
Lugar de Mulher é… na Política: Reflexões sobre Micro e Macroagressões de Identidades Raízes da Exaustão de Mulheres Trabalhadoras Brasileiras: Contribuições do Materialismo Histórico Dialético The (Un)productivity of Reproductive Work and the Woman’s Exhaustion in Contemporary Times A (Im)produtividade do Trabalho Reprodutivo e a Exaustão das Mulheres na Contemporaneidade A Woman’s Place is… in Politics: Reflections about Micro and Macroaggressions of Identities
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1