估算俄罗斯经济部门间劳动力资源再配置对总劳动生产率增长的作用

Q3 Economics, Econometrics and Finance REconomy Pub Date : 2022-01-01 DOI:10.15826/recon.2022.8.1.005
I. Savin, Denis K. Letyagin
{"title":"估算俄罗斯经济部门间劳动力资源再配置对总劳动生产率增长的作用","authors":"I. Savin, Denis K. Letyagin","doi":"10.15826/recon.2022.8.1.005","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Relevance. Economic growth can be achieved in two different ways: through technological improvements and reallocation of market shares from less to more productive units. Despite the significant research literature on innovation in Russia, the literature on market selection, especially at the sectoral level, is relatively scarce. This is the research gap that this study aims to address. Research objective. The article assesses how labor resource reallocation between sectors has influenced the dynamics of aggregate labor productivity in the Russian economy over the past two decades. Data and methods. For this purpose, the growth of aggregate labor productivity was decomposed into the growth of productivity within the sectors themselves and the reallocation of labor resources between them. This allowed us to conduct a quantitative estimation of the role of market selection at the sectoral level. For our study, we used data from Rosstat (from 2002 to 2018) and the World Input-Output Database (from 2000 to 2014). Results. For Rosstat data, the ratio of the effect of changes in labor productivity and labor resource reallocation by sector on total labor productivity over the period was 0.71/0.29, and for WIOD data it was 0.44/0.56. This indicates that labor resources are more likely to be reallocated to related sectors (e.g. between manufacturing industries). Conclusions. The results suggest that there is competitive market selection at the sectoral level and that labor has generally been reallocated to more productive sectors of the economy, contributing significantly to the growth of aggregate productivity in the economy. Our study shows the sectors of the economy where this reallocation has taken place, which may help to determine where this process is successful and where it needs additional stimulation.","PeriodicalId":33206,"journal":{"name":"REconomy","volume":"46 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Estimating the role of labor resources reallocation between sectors on the growth of aggregate labor productivity in the Russian economy\",\"authors\":\"I. Savin, Denis K. Letyagin\",\"doi\":\"10.15826/recon.2022.8.1.005\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Relevance. Economic growth can be achieved in two different ways: through technological improvements and reallocation of market shares from less to more productive units. Despite the significant research literature on innovation in Russia, the literature on market selection, especially at the sectoral level, is relatively scarce. This is the research gap that this study aims to address. Research objective. The article assesses how labor resource reallocation between sectors has influenced the dynamics of aggregate labor productivity in the Russian economy over the past two decades. Data and methods. For this purpose, the growth of aggregate labor productivity was decomposed into the growth of productivity within the sectors themselves and the reallocation of labor resources between them. This allowed us to conduct a quantitative estimation of the role of market selection at the sectoral level. For our study, we used data from Rosstat (from 2002 to 2018) and the World Input-Output Database (from 2000 to 2014). Results. For Rosstat data, the ratio of the effect of changes in labor productivity and labor resource reallocation by sector on total labor productivity over the period was 0.71/0.29, and for WIOD data it was 0.44/0.56. This indicates that labor resources are more likely to be reallocated to related sectors (e.g. between manufacturing industries). Conclusions. The results suggest that there is competitive market selection at the sectoral level and that labor has generally been reallocated to more productive sectors of the economy, contributing significantly to the growth of aggregate productivity in the economy. Our study shows the sectors of the economy where this reallocation has taken place, which may help to determine where this process is successful and where it needs additional stimulation.\",\"PeriodicalId\":33206,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"REconomy\",\"volume\":\"46 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"REconomy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.15826/recon.2022.8.1.005\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"Economics, Econometrics and Finance\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"REconomy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15826/recon.2022.8.1.005","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

的相关性。经济增长可以通过两种不同的方式实现:通过技术改进和将市场份额从生产率较低的单位重新分配给生产率较高的单位。尽管俄罗斯有大量关于创新的研究文献,但关于市场选择的文献,特别是在部门层面上的文献相对较少。这是本研究旨在解决的研究缺口。研究目标。文章评估了劳动力资源在部门之间的再分配如何影响了过去二十年来俄罗斯经济中总劳动生产率的动态。数据和方法。为此,将总劳动生产率的增长分解为部门内部生产率的增长和部门间劳动资源的再配置。这使我们能够在部门层面上对市场选择的作用进行定量估计。在我们的研究中,我们使用了俄罗斯国家统计局(2002年至2018年)和世界投入产出数据库(2000年至2014年)的数据。结果。对于Rosstat的数据,劳动生产率变化和劳动力资源再配置对同期总劳动生产率的影响之比为0.71/0.29,对于WIOD的数据为0.44/0.56。这表明劳动力资源更有可能被重新分配到相关部门(例如制造业之间)。结论。结果表明,在部门一级存在竞争性市场选择,劳动力普遍被重新分配到经济中生产率更高的部门,对经济中总生产率的增长作出了重大贡献。我们的研究显示了这种再分配已经发生的经济部门,这可能有助于确定这种过程在哪些方面是成功的,哪些方面需要额外的刺激。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Estimating the role of labor resources reallocation between sectors on the growth of aggregate labor productivity in the Russian economy
Relevance. Economic growth can be achieved in two different ways: through technological improvements and reallocation of market shares from less to more productive units. Despite the significant research literature on innovation in Russia, the literature on market selection, especially at the sectoral level, is relatively scarce. This is the research gap that this study aims to address. Research objective. The article assesses how labor resource reallocation between sectors has influenced the dynamics of aggregate labor productivity in the Russian economy over the past two decades. Data and methods. For this purpose, the growth of aggregate labor productivity was decomposed into the growth of productivity within the sectors themselves and the reallocation of labor resources between them. This allowed us to conduct a quantitative estimation of the role of market selection at the sectoral level. For our study, we used data from Rosstat (from 2002 to 2018) and the World Input-Output Database (from 2000 to 2014). Results. For Rosstat data, the ratio of the effect of changes in labor productivity and labor resource reallocation by sector on total labor productivity over the period was 0.71/0.29, and for WIOD data it was 0.44/0.56. This indicates that labor resources are more likely to be reallocated to related sectors (e.g. between manufacturing industries). Conclusions. The results suggest that there is competitive market selection at the sectoral level and that labor has generally been reallocated to more productive sectors of the economy, contributing significantly to the growth of aggregate productivity in the economy. Our study shows the sectors of the economy where this reallocation has taken place, which may help to determine where this process is successful and where it needs additional stimulation.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
REconomy
REconomy Economics, Econometrics and Finance-General Economics, Econometrics and Finance
CiteScore
1.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
8
审稿时长
14 weeks
期刊最新文献
Modelling Outflow Remittances in the Digital Era: A Subnational Analysis of Russia Digital platforms for regional economic research: a review and methodology proposal Impact of Trade and Capital Openness on the Government Size of Russia Factors Influencing Chinese Migrants’ Entrepreneurial Activity in Russia: A Case Study of Sverdlovsk Region Asymmetric Dynamics of Inflation Inertia in Some Selected Non-Eurozone European Countries
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1