偏远地区气化方案的经济可行性(以俄罗斯斯维尔德洛夫斯克地区为例)

Q3 Economics, Econometrics and Finance REconomy Pub Date : 2023-01-01 DOI:10.15826/recon.2023.9.1.001
G. Chebotareva, A. A. Dvinayninov
{"title":"偏远地区气化方案的经济可行性(以俄罗斯斯维尔德洛夫斯克地区为例)","authors":"G. Chebotareva, A. A. Dvinayninov","doi":"10.15826/recon.2023.9.1.001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Relevance. Structural changes in the Russian market create new trends, including energy supply in remote areas. The government is planning to redirect natural gas to domestic buyers. However, according to the estimates of biogas potential, it can fully meet the energy needs of households with no access to centralized gas supply. Research objective is to choose the optimal scenario of gasification in remote areas by evaluating the economic feasibility of several alternatives, including biogas technologies and the centralized gas supply system. Data and methods. The study focuses on the case of Sverdlovsk region and considers three scenarios of gasification in its remote areas. The method includes the calculation of the full discounted value of energy facilities, the comparison of their productive capacity, the analysis of the key external factors. Results. In terms of cost, the most economically feasible is the scenario of biogas plants using by individual households. However, accounting productivity, the scenarios based on the use of centralized gas supply or collective biogas plants. The economic feasibility of these two scenarios depends on the number of buildings serviced. Conclusions. The optimal scenario is the centralized gas supply. Despite its high costs, it can ensure the uninterrupted supply of the necessary energy amount to private households and does not depend on factors such as the availability of manure and organic waste and weather conditions. One more advantage is that Russia currently has a more elaborate and adequate legal framework regulating its use than for the other two options.","PeriodicalId":33206,"journal":{"name":"REconomy","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Economic feasibility of gasification scenarios in remote areas (the case of Sverdlovsk region, Russia)\",\"authors\":\"G. Chebotareva, A. A. Dvinayninov\",\"doi\":\"10.15826/recon.2023.9.1.001\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Relevance. Structural changes in the Russian market create new trends, including energy supply in remote areas. The government is planning to redirect natural gas to domestic buyers. However, according to the estimates of biogas potential, it can fully meet the energy needs of households with no access to centralized gas supply. Research objective is to choose the optimal scenario of gasification in remote areas by evaluating the economic feasibility of several alternatives, including biogas technologies and the centralized gas supply system. Data and methods. The study focuses on the case of Sverdlovsk region and considers three scenarios of gasification in its remote areas. The method includes the calculation of the full discounted value of energy facilities, the comparison of their productive capacity, the analysis of the key external factors. Results. In terms of cost, the most economically feasible is the scenario of biogas plants using by individual households. However, accounting productivity, the scenarios based on the use of centralized gas supply or collective biogas plants. The economic feasibility of these two scenarios depends on the number of buildings serviced. Conclusions. The optimal scenario is the centralized gas supply. Despite its high costs, it can ensure the uninterrupted supply of the necessary energy amount to private households and does not depend on factors such as the availability of manure and organic waste and weather conditions. One more advantage is that Russia currently has a more elaborate and adequate legal framework regulating its use than for the other two options.\",\"PeriodicalId\":33206,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"REconomy\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"REconomy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.15826/recon.2023.9.1.001\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"Economics, Econometrics and Finance\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"REconomy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15826/recon.2023.9.1.001","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

的相关性。俄罗斯市场的结构性变化创造了新的趋势,包括偏远地区的能源供应。政府正计划将天然气转向国内买家。但根据沼气潜力估算,完全可以满足无法集中供气的家庭的能源需求。研究目标是通过评估几种替代方案的经济可行性,包括沼气技术和集中供气系统,选择偏远地区气化的最佳方案。数据和方法。该研究的重点是斯维尔德洛夫斯克地区的情况下,并考虑了气化在其偏远地区的三种情况。该方法包括计算能源设施的全部贴现价值,比较其生产能力,分析关键外部因素。结果。就成本而言,最经济可行的方案是由个人家庭使用沼气厂。但是,在核算生产率时,基于集中供气或集体沼气厂使用的情景。这两种方案的经济可行性取决于服务的建筑物数量。结论。最优方案是集中供气。尽管成本很高,但它可以确保不间断地向私人家庭提供必要的能源,而且不依赖于粪肥和有机废物的可用性以及天气条件等因素。另一个优势是,与其他两种选择相比,俄罗斯目前有一个更详细、更充分的法律框架来规范其使用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Economic feasibility of gasification scenarios in remote areas (the case of Sverdlovsk region, Russia)
Relevance. Structural changes in the Russian market create new trends, including energy supply in remote areas. The government is planning to redirect natural gas to domestic buyers. However, according to the estimates of biogas potential, it can fully meet the energy needs of households with no access to centralized gas supply. Research objective is to choose the optimal scenario of gasification in remote areas by evaluating the economic feasibility of several alternatives, including biogas technologies and the centralized gas supply system. Data and methods. The study focuses on the case of Sverdlovsk region and considers three scenarios of gasification in its remote areas. The method includes the calculation of the full discounted value of energy facilities, the comparison of their productive capacity, the analysis of the key external factors. Results. In terms of cost, the most economically feasible is the scenario of biogas plants using by individual households. However, accounting productivity, the scenarios based on the use of centralized gas supply or collective biogas plants. The economic feasibility of these two scenarios depends on the number of buildings serviced. Conclusions. The optimal scenario is the centralized gas supply. Despite its high costs, it can ensure the uninterrupted supply of the necessary energy amount to private households and does not depend on factors such as the availability of manure and organic waste and weather conditions. One more advantage is that Russia currently has a more elaborate and adequate legal framework regulating its use than for the other two options.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
REconomy
REconomy Economics, Econometrics and Finance-General Economics, Econometrics and Finance
CiteScore
1.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
8
审稿时长
14 weeks
期刊最新文献
Modelling Outflow Remittances in the Digital Era: A Subnational Analysis of Russia Digital platforms for regional economic research: a review and methodology proposal Impact of Trade and Capital Openness on the Government Size of Russia Factors Influencing Chinese Migrants’ Entrepreneurial Activity in Russia: A Case Study of Sverdlovsk Region Asymmetric Dynamics of Inflation Inertia in Some Selected Non-Eurozone European Countries
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1