战争、制裁、去全球化:孰先孰后?

IF 1.1 3区 社会学 Q3 INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS Revista Brasileira De Politica Internacional Pub Date : 2023-06-01 DOI:10.1590/0034-7329202300104
E. Brancaccio, A. Califano
{"title":"战争、制裁、去全球化:孰先孰后?","authors":"E. Brancaccio, A. Califano","doi":"10.1590/0034-7329202300104","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"We argue that the war in Ukraine and the instrument of sanctions should be framed into a long trend – from globalization and the international imbalances it generates, to the subsequent “de-globalizing” movement –, which had a paramount role in the preparation for the war. The protagonists of the conflict are more properly identified with the two blocs of states whose economies are anchored either to the United States or China, respectively the major debtor and the major creditor of the world. In this context, the distinction between sanctions and protectionist policies is increasingly blurred, while both are growingly intertwined with defence policy","PeriodicalId":45317,"journal":{"name":"Revista Brasileira De Politica Internacional","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"War, Sanctions, Deglobalization: Which Comes First?\",\"authors\":\"E. Brancaccio, A. Califano\",\"doi\":\"10.1590/0034-7329202300104\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"We argue that the war in Ukraine and the instrument of sanctions should be framed into a long trend – from globalization and the international imbalances it generates, to the subsequent “de-globalizing” movement –, which had a paramount role in the preparation for the war. The protagonists of the conflict are more properly identified with the two blocs of states whose economies are anchored either to the United States or China, respectively the major debtor and the major creditor of the world. In this context, the distinction between sanctions and protectionist policies is increasingly blurred, while both are growingly intertwined with defence policy\",\"PeriodicalId\":45317,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Revista Brasileira De Politica Internacional\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Revista Brasileira De Politica Internacional\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"90\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1590/0034-7329202300104\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"社会学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Revista Brasileira De Politica Internacional","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1590/0034-7329202300104","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

我们认为,应该把乌克兰战争和制裁手段纳入一个长期趋势- -从全球化及其产生的国际不平衡,到随后的“去全球化”运动- -这一趋势在准备战争方面发挥了至关重要的作用。更恰当地说,这场冲突的主角是经济依附于美国或中国的两个国家集团,它们分别是世界的主要债务国和主要债权国。在这方面,制裁和保护主义政策之间的区别日益模糊,而两者又日益与国防政策交织在一起
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
War, Sanctions, Deglobalization: Which Comes First?
We argue that the war in Ukraine and the instrument of sanctions should be framed into a long trend – from globalization and the international imbalances it generates, to the subsequent “de-globalizing” movement –, which had a paramount role in the preparation for the war. The protagonists of the conflict are more properly identified with the two blocs of states whose economies are anchored either to the United States or China, respectively the major debtor and the major creditor of the world. In this context, the distinction between sanctions and protectionist policies is increasingly blurred, while both are growingly intertwined with defence policy
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.80
自引率
16.70%
发文量
11
审稿时长
14 weeks
期刊最新文献
Domestic regimes and national preferences as factors of regionalism’s crisis. The case of Guatemala’s regional integration policy War, Sanctions, Deglobalization: Which Comes First? Brazil-China Cooperation in the Arctic Region: A Prospective Analysis of a Practical Agenda for Mutual, Local and Community Interests Domestic Politics, Prestige, and War: The Emergence of Chile’s Democratic Status Narrative How do impeachments influence foreign policies? Lessons from South America
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1