利用涡通量塔数据估算西孟加拉邦孙德班热带红树林的净地表辐射

IF 0.9 4区 地球科学 Q4 GEOCHEMISTRY & GEOPHYSICS Geofizika Pub Date : 2016-01-01 DOI:10.15233/GFZ.2016.33.5
D. Mahalakshmi, A. Paul, D. Dutta, M. Ali, V. Dadhwal, R. S. Reddy, C. Jha, J. R. Sharma
{"title":"利用涡通量塔数据估算西孟加拉邦孙德班热带红树林的净地表辐射","authors":"D. Mahalakshmi, A. Paul, D. Dutta, M. Ali, V. Dadhwal, R. S. Reddy, C. Jha, J. R. Sharma","doi":"10.15233/GFZ.2016.33.5","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In this study, net surface radiation (Rn) was estimated using artificial neural network (ANN) and Linear Model (LM). Then, estimated Rn with both the models (ANN and LM) were compared with measured Rn from eddy covariance (EC) flux tower. The routinely measured meteorological variables namely air temperature, relative humidity and wind velocity were used as input to the ANN and global solar radiation as input to the LM. All the input data are from the EC flux tower. Sensitivity analysis of ANN with all the meteorological variables is carried out by excluding one by one meteorological variable. The validation results demonstrated that, ANN and LM estimated Rn values were in good agreement with the measured values, with root mean square error (RMSE) varying between 21.63 W/m2 and 34.94 W/m2, mean absolute error (MAE) between 17.93 W/m2 and 22.28 W/m2 and coefficient of residual mass (CRM) between –0.007 and –0.04 respectively. Further we have computed modelling efficiency (0.97 for ANN and 0.99 for LM) and coefficient of determination (R2 = 0.97 for ANN and 0.99 for LM) for both the models. Even though both the models could predict Rn successfully, ANN was better in terms of minimum number of routinely measured meteorological variables as input. The results of the ANN sensitivity analysis indicated that air temperatuere is the more important parameter followed by relative humidity, wind speed and wind direction.","PeriodicalId":50419,"journal":{"name":"Geofizika","volume":"1 1","pages":"1-14"},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2016-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Estimation of net surface radiation using eddy flux tower data over a tropical mangrove forest of Sundarban, West Bengal\",\"authors\":\"D. Mahalakshmi, A. Paul, D. Dutta, M. Ali, V. Dadhwal, R. S. Reddy, C. Jha, J. R. Sharma\",\"doi\":\"10.15233/GFZ.2016.33.5\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"In this study, net surface radiation (Rn) was estimated using artificial neural network (ANN) and Linear Model (LM). Then, estimated Rn with both the models (ANN and LM) were compared with measured Rn from eddy covariance (EC) flux tower. The routinely measured meteorological variables namely air temperature, relative humidity and wind velocity were used as input to the ANN and global solar radiation as input to the LM. All the input data are from the EC flux tower. Sensitivity analysis of ANN with all the meteorological variables is carried out by excluding one by one meteorological variable. The validation results demonstrated that, ANN and LM estimated Rn values were in good agreement with the measured values, with root mean square error (RMSE) varying between 21.63 W/m2 and 34.94 W/m2, mean absolute error (MAE) between 17.93 W/m2 and 22.28 W/m2 and coefficient of residual mass (CRM) between –0.007 and –0.04 respectively. Further we have computed modelling efficiency (0.97 for ANN and 0.99 for LM) and coefficient of determination (R2 = 0.97 for ANN and 0.99 for LM) for both the models. Even though both the models could predict Rn successfully, ANN was better in terms of minimum number of routinely measured meteorological variables as input. The results of the ANN sensitivity analysis indicated that air temperatuere is the more important parameter followed by relative humidity, wind speed and wind direction.\",\"PeriodicalId\":50419,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Geofizika\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"1-14\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2016-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Geofizika\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"89\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.15233/GFZ.2016.33.5\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"地球科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"GEOCHEMISTRY & GEOPHYSICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Geofizika","FirstCategoryId":"89","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15233/GFZ.2016.33.5","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"GEOCHEMISTRY & GEOPHYSICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本研究采用人工神经网络(ANN)和线性模型(LM)估算净表面辐射(Rn)。然后,将两种模型(ANN和LM)估计的Rn与涡流相关(EC)通量塔测量的Rn进行比较。将常规测量的气象变量,即气温、相对湿度和风速作为人工神经网络的输入,将全球太阳辐射作为LM的输入。所有输入数据都来自EC磁通塔。通过逐个排除气象变量,对所有气象变量进行人工神经网络的敏感性分析。验证结果表明,ANN和LM估计的Rn值与实测值吻合较好,均方根误差(RMSE)在21.63 ~ 34.94 W/m2之间,平均绝对误差(MAE)在17.93 ~ 22.28 W/m2之间,剩余质量系数(CRM)在-0.007 ~ -0.04之间。此外,我们计算了两个模型的建模效率(人工神经网络为0.97,LM为0.99)和决定系数(人工神经网络R2 = 0.97, LM为0.99)。尽管这两种模型都可以成功地预测Rn,但就常规测量气象变量作为输入的最小数量而言,人工神经网络更好。人工神经网络灵敏度分析结果表明,空气温度是最重要的参数,其次是相对湿度、风速和风向。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Estimation of net surface radiation using eddy flux tower data over a tropical mangrove forest of Sundarban, West Bengal
In this study, net surface radiation (Rn) was estimated using artificial neural network (ANN) and Linear Model (LM). Then, estimated Rn with both the models (ANN and LM) were compared with measured Rn from eddy covariance (EC) flux tower. The routinely measured meteorological variables namely air temperature, relative humidity and wind velocity were used as input to the ANN and global solar radiation as input to the LM. All the input data are from the EC flux tower. Sensitivity analysis of ANN with all the meteorological variables is carried out by excluding one by one meteorological variable. The validation results demonstrated that, ANN and LM estimated Rn values were in good agreement with the measured values, with root mean square error (RMSE) varying between 21.63 W/m2 and 34.94 W/m2, mean absolute error (MAE) between 17.93 W/m2 and 22.28 W/m2 and coefficient of residual mass (CRM) between –0.007 and –0.04 respectively. Further we have computed modelling efficiency (0.97 for ANN and 0.99 for LM) and coefficient of determination (R2 = 0.97 for ANN and 0.99 for LM) for both the models. Even though both the models could predict Rn successfully, ANN was better in terms of minimum number of routinely measured meteorological variables as input. The results of the ANN sensitivity analysis indicated that air temperatuere is the more important parameter followed by relative humidity, wind speed and wind direction.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Geofizika
Geofizika 地学-地球化学与地球物理
CiteScore
1.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
17
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Geofizika journal succeeds the Papers series (Radovi), which has been published since 1923 at the Geophysical Institute in Zagreb (current the Department of Geophysics, Faculty of Science, University of Zagreb). Geofizika publishes contributions dealing with physics of the atmosphere, the sea and the Earth''s interior.
期刊最新文献
Mediterranean meteotsunamis of May 2021 and June 2022 Očekivano toplinsko opterećenje Dubrovnika, Osijeka, Rijeke, Zadra i Zagreba prema projekcijama regionalnih klimatskih modela Short-term forecasting of PM10 and PM2.5 concentrations with Facebook's Prophet Model at the Belgrade-Zeleno brdo Statistical analogies between earthquakes, micro-quakes in metals and avalanches in the 1D Burridge-Knopoff model Kratkoročna prognoza vidljivosti određena metodom slučajne šume
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1