基于场刚度非线性的桩沉降评价

IF 0.3 Q4 ENGINEERING, GEOLOGICAL Geotechnical Engineering Pub Date : 2005-01-01 DOI:10.1680/GENG.2005.158.1.35
R. Berardi, R. Bovolenta
{"title":"基于场刚度非线性的桩沉降评价","authors":"R. Berardi, R. Bovolenta","doi":"10.1680/GENG.2005.158.1.35","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Understanding the principal features of soil stiffness has been one of the major achievements of geotechnical engineering over the past 30 years. The study of modulus degradation is now one of the main research areas. Understanding non-linearity is essential in foundation design for accurate and reliable evaluation of ground movements. This paper looks at the problem of assessing of deep foundation settlements and describes two approaches developed to enable designers to take soil–foundation non-linear behaviour into account. The first provides in-field stiffness parameters evaluated by back-analysis of full-scale piles. The second involves deducting the behaviour of the soil interacting with a foundation from degradation curves characterising the soil stiffness.","PeriodicalId":45150,"journal":{"name":"Geotechnical Engineering","volume":"158 1","pages":"35-44"},"PeriodicalIF":0.3000,"publicationDate":"2005-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1680/GENG.2005.158.1.35","citationCount":"13","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Pile-settlement evaluation using field stiffness non-linearity\",\"authors\":\"R. Berardi, R. Bovolenta\",\"doi\":\"10.1680/GENG.2005.158.1.35\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Understanding the principal features of soil stiffness has been one of the major achievements of geotechnical engineering over the past 30 years. The study of modulus degradation is now one of the main research areas. Understanding non-linearity is essential in foundation design for accurate and reliable evaluation of ground movements. This paper looks at the problem of assessing of deep foundation settlements and describes two approaches developed to enable designers to take soil–foundation non-linear behaviour into account. The first provides in-field stiffness parameters evaluated by back-analysis of full-scale piles. The second involves deducting the behaviour of the soil interacting with a foundation from degradation curves characterising the soil stiffness.\",\"PeriodicalId\":45150,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Geotechnical Engineering\",\"volume\":\"158 1\",\"pages\":\"35-44\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2005-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1680/GENG.2005.158.1.35\",\"citationCount\":\"13\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Geotechnical Engineering\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1680/GENG.2005.158.1.35\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"ENGINEERING, GEOLOGICAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Geotechnical Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1680/GENG.2005.158.1.35","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, GEOLOGICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 13

摘要

了解土壤刚度的主要特征是岩土工程在过去30年中取得的主要成就之一。模量退化是目前研究的主要领域之一。了解非线性是基础设计中准确可靠地评估地面运动的必要条件。本文着眼于深地基沉降的评估问题,并描述了两种开发的方法,使设计人员能够考虑地基的非线性行为。第一种方法提供了通过全尺寸桩的反分析评估的现场刚度参数。第二个涉及从表征土壤刚度的退化曲线中推断土壤与基础相互作用的行为。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Pile-settlement evaluation using field stiffness non-linearity
Understanding the principal features of soil stiffness has been one of the major achievements of geotechnical engineering over the past 30 years. The study of modulus degradation is now one of the main research areas. Understanding non-linearity is essential in foundation design for accurate and reliable evaluation of ground movements. This paper looks at the problem of assessing of deep foundation settlements and describes two approaches developed to enable designers to take soil–foundation non-linear behaviour into account. The first provides in-field stiffness parameters evaluated by back-analysis of full-scale piles. The second involves deducting the behaviour of the soil interacting with a foundation from degradation curves characterising the soil stiffness.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Geotechnical Engineering
Geotechnical Engineering ENGINEERING, GEOLOGICAL-
CiteScore
0.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊介绍: The objectives of the Association shall be the promotion of co-operation among geotechnical societies in SE Asia; and the assistance to member societies who have limited number of members. Now there is only one combined web titled: AGSSEA-SEAGS. SEAGS & AGSSEA encourage the submission of scholarly and practice-oriented articles to its journal. The journal is published quarterly. Both sponsors of the journal, the Southeast Asian Geotechnical Society and the Association of Geotechnical Societies in Southeast Asia, promote the ideals and goals of the International Society of Soil Mechanics and Geotechhnical Engineering in fostering communications, developing insights and enabling the advancement of the geotechnical engineering discipline.
期刊最新文献
Influence of testing on permeability of compacted fine soils Recently in Géotechnique Instrumentation at Changi land reclamation project, Singapore On-site characterisation of loessic deposits in Kent, UK Deflectometer-based analysis of ballasted railway tracks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1