Gabriel Smester, J. Medina, C. Brown, A. Fish, V. Wells, M. Beggs, J. Medina
{"title":"克服当前肺癌风险评估的缺陷:通过一种新的血浆蛋白生物标志物测试改进肺结节特征","authors":"Gabriel Smester, J. Medina, C. Brown, A. Fish, V. Wells, M. Beggs, J. Medina","doi":"10.15761/brr.1000125","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Pulmonologists frequently encounter indeterminate pulmonary nodules. Predicting the risk of developing lung cancer is a difficult task as evidenced by the high rate of overdiagnosis and overtreatment of indolent disease. There is an unmet clinical need for a non-invasive, easy to administer, diagnostic assay to help prevent the potentially serious consequences of overdiagnosis. Here we report on the clinical work-up of a high-risk patient with an indeterminate pulmonary nodule. This case suggests that applying a new blood test in a point of care setting in a community-based practice can accurately characterize scan identified, or incidentally found, lung nodules. The novel assay may potentially minimize aggressive interventions in patients with benign disease. *Correspondence to: Amanda L Fish, MagArray Inc, Milpitas CA, USA, E-mail: Amanda.Fish@magarray.com Received: March 10, 2019; Accepted: March 25, 2019; Published: March 28, 2019 Introduction With cigarette smoking as the acknowledged root cause, lung cancer remains a leading cause of cancer deaths worldwide, with high mortality largely attributed to its diagnosis late in the disease process when cure is not possible [1]. The National Lung Screening Trial (NLST) brought hope that screening high-risk patients with a yearly chest low-dose CT scan could lead to a 20% relative risk reduction in lung cancer deaths [2]. This decrease in mortality was paralleled by an increase in the diagnosis of stage I non-small cell lung cancer, implying that this screening paradigm leads to decreased mortality by shifting the stage at diagnosis to an earlier, curative stage. Coupled with the increase in chest CT scans performed for lung cancer screening, CT imaging is increasingly used for the diagnosis and evaluation of thoracic and extra-thoracic disease, all leading to increased identification of pulmonary nodules [3]. In the National Lung Screening Trial (NLST), 24% of screened patients were found to have a concerning pulmonary nodule with only 4% of those ultimately determined to be malignant, even in this high-risk population [2]. The current paradigm for management of pulmonary nodules > 8 mm diameter is centered on estimates of a pretest probability for malignancy. Those nodules with a high pretest probability (> 65%) are aggressively managed (typically surgical resection), whereas those at low risk (05%) are managed conservatively. Intermediate-risk nodules (5%-65%), which constitute almost one-half of the pulmonary nodules identified by chest CT scan, require further diagnostic evaluation, including other imaging, bronchoscopy, percutaneous biopsy, or surgical biopsy [4]. Even minimally invasive procedures carry significant risks and anxiety to patients, and the cost of diagnostic evaluation increases 28fold when biopsy is performed [5,6]. Patients with intermediate-risk nodules would therefore benefit from additional risk stratification tools to determine those truly in need of more aggressive evaluation, and those for whom a less risky approach is warranted. These desires have led to considerable interest in identifying blood-based biomarkers that can differentiate lung cancer from benign disease nodules [7]. A recent publication highlights the clinical validation and performance of a novel, multiplexed, plasma protein signature as a risk assessment tool [8]. The authors established the assay’s ability to aid in correctly identifying the risk of malignancy for a pulmonary nodule that falls into the inconclusive intermediate risk for lung cancer as calculated by the VA Clinical Factors Model [9]. The assay was evaluated with a set of 277 samples, all from current smokers with an indeterminate pulmonary nodule 4-30 mm in diameter from which an algorithm was defined for risk classification. The assay and algorithm were then evaluated in an independent validation cohort of 97 subjects [8]. Among the 97 validation study subjects, 68 were grouped as having intermediate risk by the VA model. The biomarker algorithmbased test correctly identified 44 (65%) of these intermediate-risk samples as lower risk (n = 16) or higher risk (n = 28). The test showed a sensitivity of 94% and a negative predictive value (NPV) of 94% [8] in the intended use population having a cancer prevalence rate of 25% [10]. Almost all subjects (98%) had early stage disease as defined by lung cancer Stage I or II [8]. The novel blood test demonstrated efficacy in accurately identifying patients at low risk of lung cancer to rule-out the need for risky aggressive actions. Thus, the plasma protein assay has the potential to aid clinicians to more accurately characterize radiologically-indeterminate pulmonary nodules in current smokers Smester G (2019) Overcoming the pitfalls of current lung cancer risk assessment: Improved lung nodule characterization by a novel plasma protein biomarker test Volume 3: 2-4 Biomed Res Rev, 2019 doi: 10.15761/BRR.1000125 and help provide additional insight to support a more informed clinical decision about performing an invasive evaluation of the patient’s lung nodule [8]. Case report: Peace of mind for patient and provider The REVEAL test aids decision making and reduces the psychologic toll of uncertainty in a patient with indeterminate lung nodules and prevents unnecessary risky interventions. A 73-year-old male from the Dominican Republic presented on August 2, 2018 complaining of a dry cough and shortness of breath on exertion as well as hypertension, back and neck pain and leg cramps. He was diagnosed with COPD/Emphysema in the Dominican Republic 5 years before presenting to the clinic. He brought with him a thoracic CT (performed on 4/17/18) from his country demonstrating combined emphysema and interstitial lung disease (ILD) with reticulonodular densities in the posterior lateral right mid lung, exhibiting ground glass airspace opacities, fibrosis, and bullous disease concentrated primarily in the upper lobes. The patient had a 25-year history of smoking two packs of cigarettes per day, and over 50 years of occupational exposure to wheat flour in a factory. He had a history of gout but denied any active symptoms. The patient reported home oxygen saturations in the 80s and poor compliance with supplemental oxygen and prescribed inhalers including LABA/IC and SABA. He denied chest tightness or wheezing. His surgical history is remarkable for right shoulder rotator cuff repair, a procedure on his right wrist, and hammertoe repair. Previous blood work indicated renal insufficiency and hyponatremia, which the patient confirmed are chronic. He denied any allergies, asbestos exposure, or recreational history with lung irritants. He stated he has five domesticated dogs at his home. The patient is divorced. His social history includes daily alcohol use. He is currently retired. His family history includes a grandfather with diabetes and a brother with hypertension, obstructive sleep apnea, and psoriasis. The patient also reported several relatives with a history of colon cancer which prompts him to undergo a colonoscopy every 2 years. His physical exam was significant for slight prolonged expiration and 1+ pitting edema in both lower extremities. No rhonchus, wheezing or crackles were evident. Spirometry performed exposed small airway disease and restrictive lung disease, but not a pattern of COPD. Pulmonary function tests were ordered which revealed restrictive pattern, small airway disease and decreased DLCO. A review of symptoms was positive for acid reflux treated with Prilosec. No collagen vascular disease was evident except for mild elevation of CRP and ESR. A baseline polysomnograph was positive for severe obstructive sleep apnea syndrome. A thoracic CT was performed on August 3, 2018 per chest ILD protocol and showed bullous disease and ground glass opacification. Additionally, a dominant 7x5 mm, spiculated, LUL nodule was described for the first time. The patient was referred to the Mayo Clinic in Jacksonville, Florida for an open lung biopsy to characterize his lung pathology. However, due to his increased risk of bleeding from pulmonary hypertension, it was deferred. A repeat chest CT at Mayo Clinic in September 2018 was consistent with the findings previously described, including the lung nodule. The patient opted for surveillance of the nodule and medical management with a course of prednisone for the ILD. On October 15, 2018 a novel multiplexed, plasma-protein assay – REVEAL -was ordered to better characterize the patient’s indeterminate lung nodule found on CT. His pre-test probability, calculated by the VA Clinical Factors Model, indicted 53%, placing the patient’s risk of malignancy in the intermediate risk range. A simple, venous blood draw in the office was conducted and the plasma sent to the CLIA certified testing laboratory. The assay result was provided within three days as a score of 34 (Figure 1) indicating a 94% probability the patient’s nodule was lower-risk, benign disease. Based on this new information, the patient agreed with us to proceed with a serial surveillance strategy. Three months later, a follow up thoracic CT was performed indicating resolution of the ILD and reduction of the size of the LUL nodule to 6.2 × 2.8 mm. The prednisone was reduced and CellCept was added. From a pulmonary standpoint, the patient continues to do well. He is scheduled to return to the clinic in four months for a full PFT and a chest CT.","PeriodicalId":92337,"journal":{"name":"Biomedical research and reviews","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Overcoming the pitfalls of current lung cancer risk assessment: Improved lung nodule characterization by a novel plasma protein biomarker test\",\"authors\":\"Gabriel Smester, J. Medina, C. Brown, A. Fish, V. Wells, M. Beggs, J. Medina\",\"doi\":\"10.15761/brr.1000125\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Pulmonologists frequently encounter indeterminate pulmonary nodules. Predicting the risk of developing lung cancer is a difficult task as evidenced by the high rate of overdiagnosis and overtreatment of indolent disease. There is an unmet clinical need for a non-invasive, easy to administer, diagnostic assay to help prevent the potentially serious consequences of overdiagnosis. Here we report on the clinical work-up of a high-risk patient with an indeterminate pulmonary nodule. This case suggests that applying a new blood test in a point of care setting in a community-based practice can accurately characterize scan identified, or incidentally found, lung nodules. The novel assay may potentially minimize aggressive interventions in patients with benign disease. *Correspondence to: Amanda L Fish, MagArray Inc, Milpitas CA, USA, E-mail: Amanda.Fish@magarray.com Received: March 10, 2019; Accepted: March 25, 2019; Published: March 28, 2019 Introduction With cigarette smoking as the acknowledged root cause, lung cancer remains a leading cause of cancer deaths worldwide, with high mortality largely attributed to its diagnosis late in the disease process when cure is not possible [1]. The National Lung Screening Trial (NLST) brought hope that screening high-risk patients with a yearly chest low-dose CT scan could lead to a 20% relative risk reduction in lung cancer deaths [2]. This decrease in mortality was paralleled by an increase in the diagnosis of stage I non-small cell lung cancer, implying that this screening paradigm leads to decreased mortality by shifting the stage at diagnosis to an earlier, curative stage. Coupled with the increase in chest CT scans performed for lung cancer screening, CT imaging is increasingly used for the diagnosis and evaluation of thoracic and extra-thoracic disease, all leading to increased identification of pulmonary nodules [3]. In the National Lung Screening Trial (NLST), 24% of screened patients were found to have a concerning pulmonary nodule with only 4% of those ultimately determined to be malignant, even in this high-risk population [2]. The current paradigm for management of pulmonary nodules > 8 mm diameter is centered on estimates of a pretest probability for malignancy. Those nodules with a high pretest probability (> 65%) are aggressively managed (typically surgical resection), whereas those at low risk (05%) are managed conservatively. Intermediate-risk nodules (5%-65%), which constitute almost one-half of the pulmonary nodules identified by chest CT scan, require further diagnostic evaluation, including other imaging, bronchoscopy, percutaneous biopsy, or surgical biopsy [4]. Even minimally invasive procedures carry significant risks and anxiety to patients, and the cost of diagnostic evaluation increases 28fold when biopsy is performed [5,6]. Patients with intermediate-risk nodules would therefore benefit from additional risk stratification tools to determine those truly in need of more aggressive evaluation, and those for whom a less risky approach is warranted. These desires have led to considerable interest in identifying blood-based biomarkers that can differentiate lung cancer from benign disease nodules [7]. A recent publication highlights the clinical validation and performance of a novel, multiplexed, plasma protein signature as a risk assessment tool [8]. The authors established the assay’s ability to aid in correctly identifying the risk of malignancy for a pulmonary nodule that falls into the inconclusive intermediate risk for lung cancer as calculated by the VA Clinical Factors Model [9]. The assay was evaluated with a set of 277 samples, all from current smokers with an indeterminate pulmonary nodule 4-30 mm in diameter from which an algorithm was defined for risk classification. The assay and algorithm were then evaluated in an independent validation cohort of 97 subjects [8]. Among the 97 validation study subjects, 68 were grouped as having intermediate risk by the VA model. The biomarker algorithmbased test correctly identified 44 (65%) of these intermediate-risk samples as lower risk (n = 16) or higher risk (n = 28). The test showed a sensitivity of 94% and a negative predictive value (NPV) of 94% [8] in the intended use population having a cancer prevalence rate of 25% [10]. Almost all subjects (98%) had early stage disease as defined by lung cancer Stage I or II [8]. The novel blood test demonstrated efficacy in accurately identifying patients at low risk of lung cancer to rule-out the need for risky aggressive actions. Thus, the plasma protein assay has the potential to aid clinicians to more accurately characterize radiologically-indeterminate pulmonary nodules in current smokers Smester G (2019) Overcoming the pitfalls of current lung cancer risk assessment: Improved lung nodule characterization by a novel plasma protein biomarker test Volume 3: 2-4 Biomed Res Rev, 2019 doi: 10.15761/BRR.1000125 and help provide additional insight to support a more informed clinical decision about performing an invasive evaluation of the patient’s lung nodule [8]. Case report: Peace of mind for patient and provider The REVEAL test aids decision making and reduces the psychologic toll of uncertainty in a patient with indeterminate lung nodules and prevents unnecessary risky interventions. A 73-year-old male from the Dominican Republic presented on August 2, 2018 complaining of a dry cough and shortness of breath on exertion as well as hypertension, back and neck pain and leg cramps. He was diagnosed with COPD/Emphysema in the Dominican Republic 5 years before presenting to the clinic. He brought with him a thoracic CT (performed on 4/17/18) from his country demonstrating combined emphysema and interstitial lung disease (ILD) with reticulonodular densities in the posterior lateral right mid lung, exhibiting ground glass airspace opacities, fibrosis, and bullous disease concentrated primarily in the upper lobes. The patient had a 25-year history of smoking two packs of cigarettes per day, and over 50 years of occupational exposure to wheat flour in a factory. He had a history of gout but denied any active symptoms. The patient reported home oxygen saturations in the 80s and poor compliance with supplemental oxygen and prescribed inhalers including LABA/IC and SABA. He denied chest tightness or wheezing. His surgical history is remarkable for right shoulder rotator cuff repair, a procedure on his right wrist, and hammertoe repair. Previous blood work indicated renal insufficiency and hyponatremia, which the patient confirmed are chronic. He denied any allergies, asbestos exposure, or recreational history with lung irritants. He stated he has five domesticated dogs at his home. The patient is divorced. His social history includes daily alcohol use. He is currently retired. His family history includes a grandfather with diabetes and a brother with hypertension, obstructive sleep apnea, and psoriasis. The patient also reported several relatives with a history of colon cancer which prompts him to undergo a colonoscopy every 2 years. His physical exam was significant for slight prolonged expiration and 1+ pitting edema in both lower extremities. No rhonchus, wheezing or crackles were evident. Spirometry performed exposed small airway disease and restrictive lung disease, but not a pattern of COPD. Pulmonary function tests were ordered which revealed restrictive pattern, small airway disease and decreased DLCO. A review of symptoms was positive for acid reflux treated with Prilosec. No collagen vascular disease was evident except for mild elevation of CRP and ESR. A baseline polysomnograph was positive for severe obstructive sleep apnea syndrome. A thoracic CT was performed on August 3, 2018 per chest ILD protocol and showed bullous disease and ground glass opacification. Additionally, a dominant 7x5 mm, spiculated, LUL nodule was described for the first time. The patient was referred to the Mayo Clinic in Jacksonville, Florida for an open lung biopsy to characterize his lung pathology. However, due to his increased risk of bleeding from pulmonary hypertension, it was deferred. A repeat chest CT at Mayo Clinic in September 2018 was consistent with the findings previously described, including the lung nodule. The patient opted for surveillance of the nodule and medical management with a course of prednisone for the ILD. On October 15, 2018 a novel multiplexed, plasma-protein assay – REVEAL -was ordered to better characterize the patient’s indeterminate lung nodule found on CT. His pre-test probability, calculated by the VA Clinical Factors Model, indicted 53%, placing the patient’s risk of malignancy in the intermediate risk range. A simple, venous blood draw in the office was conducted and the plasma sent to the CLIA certified testing laboratory. The assay result was provided within three days as a score of 34 (Figure 1) indicating a 94% probability the patient’s nodule was lower-risk, benign disease. Based on this new information, the patient agreed with us to proceed with a serial surveillance strategy. Three months later, a follow up thoracic CT was performed indicating resolution of the ILD and reduction of the size of the LUL nodule to 6.2 × 2.8 mm. The prednisone was reduced and CellCept was added. From a pulmonary standpoint, the patient continues to do well. He is scheduled to return to the clinic in four months for a full PFT and a chest CT.\",\"PeriodicalId\":92337,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Biomedical research and reviews\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Biomedical research and reviews\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.15761/brr.1000125\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Biomedical research and reviews","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15761/brr.1000125","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
肺科医生经常遇到不确定的肺结节。预测发生肺癌的风险是一项艰巨的任务,因为惰性疾病的过度诊断和过度治疗率很高。临床需要一种非侵入性、易于管理的诊断检测方法,以帮助预防过度诊断的潜在严重后果。在这里,我们报告一个高风险的不确定肺结节患者的临床检查。本病例提示,在社区实践的护理点应用新的血液检查可以准确地描述扫描发现或偶然发现的肺结节。这种新的检测方法可能潜在地减少对良性疾病患者的积极干预。*通讯:Amanda L Fish, MagArray Inc, Milpitas CA, USA, E-mail: Amanda.Fish@magarray.com收稿时间:2019年3月10日;录用日期:2019年3月25日;导言吸烟是公认的根本原因,肺癌仍然是全球癌症死亡的主要原因,其高死亡率在很大程度上归因于其在疾病晚期诊断而无法治愈。国家肺部筛查试验(NLST)带来了希望,即通过每年一次胸部低剂量CT扫描筛查高危患者,可以使肺癌死亡的相对风险降低20%。死亡率的下降与I期非小细胞肺癌诊断的增加相一致,这意味着这种筛查模式通过将诊断阶段转移到更早的治疗阶段而导致死亡率下降。再加上用于肺癌筛查的胸部CT扫描的增加,CT成像越来越多地用于胸部和胸外疾病的诊断和评估,所有这些都导致肺结节[3]的识别增加。在国家肺部筛查试验(NLST)中,24%的筛查患者被发现有一个相关的肺结节,只有4%的患者最终被确定为恶性,即使在这个高危人群中也是如此。目前治疗直径为8mm的肺结节的范例主要集中在预诊恶性概率的估计上。那些高预诊概率(> 65%)的结节采用积极治疗(典型的手术切除),而低风险(05%)的结节采用保守治疗。中危性结节(5%-65%)几乎占胸部CT扫描发现的肺结节的一半,需要进一步的诊断评估,包括其他影像学检查、支气管镜检查、经皮活检或手术活检。即使是微创手术也会给患者带来巨大的风险和焦虑,并且当进行活检时,诊断评估的成本增加了28倍[5,6]。因此,中等风险结节患者将受益于额外的风险分层工具,以确定那些真正需要更积极的评估,以及那些需要低风险方法的患者。这些愿望引起了人们对鉴别基于血液的生物标志物的极大兴趣,这些标志物可以区分肺癌和良性疾病结节[7]。最近的一份出版物强调了一种新的、多路复用的血浆蛋白信号作为风险评估工具的临床验证和性能。作者通过VA临床因素模型[9]确定了该检测有助于正确识别肺结节的恶性风险,该结节属于肺癌不确定的中间风险。采用277个样本对该检测方法进行评估,这些样本均来自患有直径为4- 30mm的不确定肺结节的当前吸烟者,并据此定义了一种风险分类算法。然后在一个由97名受试者组成的独立验证队列中对该检测方法和算法进行评估。在97名验证研究对象中,68名被VA模型分为中度风险。基于生物标志物算法的测试正确地将44个(65%)中等风险样本识别为低风险(n = 16)或高风险(n = 28)。该试验显示,在癌症患病率为25%的预期使用人群中,敏感性为94%,阴性预测值(NPV)为94%。几乎所有受试者(98%)都有早期疾病,定义为肺癌I期或II期bbb。这种新颖的血液检测在准确识别低风险肺癌患者,从而排除危险的积极行动方面的有效性。因此,血浆蛋白检测有可能帮助临床医生更准确地表征当前吸烟者放射学不确定的肺结节。Smester G(2019)克服当前肺癌风险评估的陷阱:通过一种新的血浆蛋白生物标志物测试改进肺结节表征vol . 3: 2-4 Biomed Res Rev, 2019 doi: 10.15761/BRR。 肺科医生经常遇到不确定的肺结节。预测发生肺癌的风险是一项艰巨的任务,因为惰性疾病的过度诊断和过度治疗率很高。临床需要一种非侵入性、易于管理的诊断检测方法,以帮助预防过度诊断的潜在严重后果。在这里,我们报告一个高风险的不确定肺结节患者的临床检查。本病例提示,在社区实践的护理点应用新的血液检查可以准确地描述扫描发现或偶然发现的肺结节。这种新的检测方法可能潜在地减少对良性疾病患者的积极干预。*通讯:Amanda L Fish, MagArray Inc, Milpitas CA, USA, E-mail: Amanda.Fish@magarray.com收稿时间:2019年3月10日;录用日期:2019年3月25日;导言吸烟是公认的根本原因,肺癌仍然是全球癌症死亡的主要原因,其高死亡率在很大程度上归因于其在疾病晚期诊断而无法治愈。国家肺部筛查试验(NLST)带来了希望,即通过每年一次胸部低剂量CT扫描筛查高危患者,可以使肺癌死亡的相对风险降低20%。死亡率的下降与I期非小细胞肺癌诊断的增加相一致,这意味着这种筛查模式通过将诊断阶段转移到更早的治疗阶段而导致死亡率下降。再加上用于肺癌筛查的胸部CT扫描的增加,CT成像越来越多地用于胸部和胸外疾病的诊断和评估,所有这些都导致肺结节[3]的识别增加。在国家肺部筛查试验(NLST)中,24%的筛查患者被发现有一个相关的肺结节,只有4%的患者最终被确定为恶性,即使在这个高危人群中也是如此。目前治疗直径为8mm的肺结节的范例主要集中在预诊恶性概率的估计上。那些高预诊概率(> 65%)的结节采用积极治疗(典型的手术切除),而低风险(05%)的结节采用保守治疗。中危性结节(5%-65%)几乎占胸部CT扫描发现的肺结节的一半,需要进一步的诊断评估,包括其他影像学检查、支气管镜检查、经皮活检或手术活检。即使是微创手术也会给患者带来巨大的风险和焦虑,并且当进行活检时,诊断评估的成本增加了28倍[5,6]。因此,中等风险结节患者将受益于额外的风险分层工具,以确定那些真正需要更积极的评估,以及那些需要低风险方法的患者。这些愿望引起了人们对鉴别基于血液的生物标志物的极大兴趣,这些标志物可以区分肺癌和良性疾病结节[7]。最近的一份出版物强调了一种新的、多路复用的血浆蛋白信号作为风险评估工具的临床验证和性能。作者通过VA临床因素模型[9]确定了该检测有助于正确识别肺结节的恶性风险,该结节属于肺癌不确定的中间风险。采用277个样本对该检测方法进行评估,这些样本均来自患有直径为4- 30mm的不确定肺结节的当前吸烟者,并据此定义了一种风险分类算法。然后在一个由97名受试者组成的独立验证队列中对该检测方法和算法进行评估。在97名验证研究对象中,68名被VA模型分为中度风险。基于生物标志物算法的测试正确地将44个(65%)中等风险样本识别为低风险(n = 16)或高风险(n = 28)。该试验显示,在癌症患病率为25%的预期使用人群中,敏感性为94%,阴性预测值(NPV)为94%。几乎所有受试者(98%)都有早期疾病,定义为肺癌I期或II期bbb。这种新颖的血液检测在准确识别低风险肺癌患者,从而排除危险的积极行动方面的有效性。因此,血浆蛋白检测有可能帮助临床医生更准确地表征当前吸烟者放射学不确定的肺结节。Smester G(2019)克服当前肺癌风险评估的陷阱:通过一种新的血浆蛋白生物标志物测试改进肺结节表征vol . 3: 2-4 Biomed Res Rev, 2019 doi: 10.15761/BRR。 1000125,并有助于提供额外的见解,以支持对患者肺结节进行侵入性评估的更明智的临床决策。病例报告:让患者和医生安心REVEAL检测有助于决策,减少不确定肺结节患者的不确定性带来的心理损失,并防止不必要的风险干预。2018年8月2日,一名来自多米尼加共和国的73岁男性出现干咳、用力时呼吸急促、高血压、背部和颈部疼痛以及腿部抽筋。他在多米尼加共和国被诊断患有慢性阻塞性肺病/肺气肿,5年后才来到诊所。他带来了来自本国的胸部CT(于2018年4月17日进行),显示右中肺后外侧有网状结节密度的合并肺气肿和间质性肺疾病(ILD),表现为磨玻璃空域混浊、纤维化和主要集中于上肺叶的大疱性疾病。患者有25年的吸烟史,每天抽两包烟,在工厂接触小麦粉超过50年。他有痛风病史,但否认有任何活跃症状。患者报告家中氧饱和度为80,补充氧和处方吸入器(包括LABA/IC和SABA)的依从性较差。他否认有胸闷或喘息的症状。他的手术史值得注意的是右肩肩袖修复,右手腕手术和锤状趾修复。既往血检显示肾功能不全和低钠血症,患者确认为慢性。他否认有任何过敏史、石棉接触史或肺部刺激物娱乐史。他说他家里有五只家养的狗。病人离婚了。他的社会史包括每日饮酒。他目前已经退休。他的家族史包括一个患有糖尿病的祖父和一个患有高血压、阻塞性睡眠呼吸暂停和牛皮癣的兄弟。患者还报告了几位有结肠癌病史的亲属,这促使他每两年进行一次结肠镜检查。体格检查显示轻度延长呼气,双下肢1+点状水肿。没有龙酒,没有明显的喘息声或噼啪声。肺活量测定显示暴露的小气道疾病和限制性肺疾病,但不显示COPD的模式。进行肺功能检查,发现肺功能受限,小气道病变,DLCO下降。对使用奥美拉唑治疗胃酸反流的症状的回顾是阳性的。除CRP和ESR轻度升高外,未见明显的胶原血管病变。基线多导睡眠描记仪对严重阻塞性睡眠呼吸暂停综合征呈阳性。2018年8月3日,根据胸部ILD方案进行胸部CT检查,显示大泡性疾病和磨玻璃混浊。此外,第一次描述了一个显性的7x5 mm,多刺状的LUL结节。患者被转介到佛罗里达州杰克逊维尔的梅奥诊所进行开放式肺活检,以确定其肺部病理特征。然而,由于他肺动脉高压出血的风险增加,手术被推迟了。2018年9月,梅奥诊所再次进行胸部CT检查,结果与之前描述的结果一致,包括肺结节。患者选择对结节进行监测,并对ILD进行一个疗程的泼尼松治疗。2018年10月15日,一项新的多路复用血浆蛋白检测- REVEAL -被要求更好地表征患者CT上发现的不确定肺结节。通过VA临床因素模型计算,他的测试前概率为53%,将患者的恶性肿瘤风险置于中等风险范围。在办公室进行了简单的静脉血抽取,并将血浆送到CLIA认证的检测实验室。检测结果在三天内提供,得分为34分(图1),表明患者的结节有94%的可能性是低风险的良性疾病。基于这一新信息,患者同意我们继续进行连续监测。3个月后,随访胸部CT显示ILD消退,LUL结节缩小至6.2 × 2.8 mm。泼尼松减少,加入CellCept。从肺的角度来看,病人的情况仍然很好。他计划在四个月后返回诊所进行完整的PFT和胸部CT检查。 1000125,并有助于提供额外的见解,以支持对患者肺结节进行侵入性评估的更明智的临床决策。病例报告:让患者和医生安心REVEAL检测有助于决策,减少不确定肺结节患者的不确定性带来的心理损失,并防止不必要的风险干预。2018年8月2日,一名来自多米尼加共和国的73岁男性出现干咳、用力时呼吸急促、高血压、背部和颈部疼痛以及腿部抽筋。他在多米尼加共和国被诊断患有慢性阻塞性肺病/肺气肿,5年后才来到诊所。他带来了来自本国的胸部CT(于2018年4月17日进行),显示右中肺后外侧有网状结节密度的合并肺气肿和间质性肺疾病(ILD),表现为磨玻璃空域混浊、纤维化和主要集中于上肺叶的大疱性疾病。患者有25年的吸烟史,每天抽两包烟,在工厂接触小麦粉超过50年。他有痛风病史,但否认有任何活跃症状。患者报告家中氧饱和度为80,补充氧和处方吸入器(包括LABA/IC和SABA)的依从性较差。他否认有胸闷或喘息的症状。他的手术史值得注意的是右肩肩袖修复,右手腕手术和锤状趾修复。既往血检显示肾功能不全和低钠血症,患者确认为慢性。他否认有任何过敏史、石棉接触史或肺部刺激物娱乐史。他说他家里有五只家养的狗。病人离婚了。他的社会史包括每日饮酒。他目前已经退休。他的家族史包括一个患有糖尿病的祖父和一个患有高血压、阻塞性睡眠呼吸暂停和牛皮癣的兄弟。患者还报告了几位有结肠癌病史的亲属,这促使他每两年进行一次结肠镜检查。体格检查显示轻度延长呼气,双下肢1+点状水肿。没有龙酒,没有明显的喘息声或噼啪声。肺活量测定显示暴露的小气道疾病和限制性肺疾病,但不显示COPD的模式。进行肺功能检查,发现肺功能受限,小气道病变,DLCO下降。对使用奥美拉唑治疗胃酸反流的症状的回顾是阳性的。除CRP和ESR轻度升高外,未见明显的胶原血管病变。基线多导睡眠描记仪对严重阻塞性睡眠呼吸暂停综合征呈阳性。2018年8月3日,根据胸部ILD方案进行胸部CT检查,显示大泡性疾病和磨玻璃混浊。此外,第一次描述了一个显性的7x5 mm,多刺状的LUL结节。患者被转介到佛罗里达州杰克逊维尔的梅奥诊所进行开放式肺活检,以确定其肺部病理特征。然而,由于他肺动脉高压出血的风险增加,手术被推迟了。2018年9月,梅奥诊所再次进行胸部CT检查,结果与之前描述的结果一致,包括肺结节。患者选择对结节进行监测,并对ILD进行一个疗程的泼尼松治疗。2018年10月15日,一项新的多路复用血浆蛋白检测- REVEAL -被要求更好地表征患者CT上发现的不确定肺结节。通过VA临床因素模型计算,他的测试前概率为53%,将患者的恶性肿瘤风险置于中等风险范围。在办公室进行了简单的静脉血抽取,并将血浆送到CLIA认证的检测实验室。检测结果在三天内提供,得分为34分(图1),表明患者的结节有94%的可能性是低风险的良性疾病。基于这一新信息,患者同意我们继续进行连续监测。3个月后,随访胸部CT显示ILD消退,LUL结节缩小至6.2 × 2.8 mm。泼尼松减少,加入CellCept。从肺的角度来看,病人的情况仍然很好。他计划在四个月后返回诊所进行完整的PFT和胸部CT检查。
Overcoming the pitfalls of current lung cancer risk assessment: Improved lung nodule characterization by a novel plasma protein biomarker test
Pulmonologists frequently encounter indeterminate pulmonary nodules. Predicting the risk of developing lung cancer is a difficult task as evidenced by the high rate of overdiagnosis and overtreatment of indolent disease. There is an unmet clinical need for a non-invasive, easy to administer, diagnostic assay to help prevent the potentially serious consequences of overdiagnosis. Here we report on the clinical work-up of a high-risk patient with an indeterminate pulmonary nodule. This case suggests that applying a new blood test in a point of care setting in a community-based practice can accurately characterize scan identified, or incidentally found, lung nodules. The novel assay may potentially minimize aggressive interventions in patients with benign disease. *Correspondence to: Amanda L Fish, MagArray Inc, Milpitas CA, USA, E-mail: Amanda.Fish@magarray.com Received: March 10, 2019; Accepted: March 25, 2019; Published: March 28, 2019 Introduction With cigarette smoking as the acknowledged root cause, lung cancer remains a leading cause of cancer deaths worldwide, with high mortality largely attributed to its diagnosis late in the disease process when cure is not possible [1]. The National Lung Screening Trial (NLST) brought hope that screening high-risk patients with a yearly chest low-dose CT scan could lead to a 20% relative risk reduction in lung cancer deaths [2]. This decrease in mortality was paralleled by an increase in the diagnosis of stage I non-small cell lung cancer, implying that this screening paradigm leads to decreased mortality by shifting the stage at diagnosis to an earlier, curative stage. Coupled with the increase in chest CT scans performed for lung cancer screening, CT imaging is increasingly used for the diagnosis and evaluation of thoracic and extra-thoracic disease, all leading to increased identification of pulmonary nodules [3]. In the National Lung Screening Trial (NLST), 24% of screened patients were found to have a concerning pulmonary nodule with only 4% of those ultimately determined to be malignant, even in this high-risk population [2]. The current paradigm for management of pulmonary nodules > 8 mm diameter is centered on estimates of a pretest probability for malignancy. Those nodules with a high pretest probability (> 65%) are aggressively managed (typically surgical resection), whereas those at low risk (05%) are managed conservatively. Intermediate-risk nodules (5%-65%), which constitute almost one-half of the pulmonary nodules identified by chest CT scan, require further diagnostic evaluation, including other imaging, bronchoscopy, percutaneous biopsy, or surgical biopsy [4]. Even minimally invasive procedures carry significant risks and anxiety to patients, and the cost of diagnostic evaluation increases 28fold when biopsy is performed [5,6]. Patients with intermediate-risk nodules would therefore benefit from additional risk stratification tools to determine those truly in need of more aggressive evaluation, and those for whom a less risky approach is warranted. These desires have led to considerable interest in identifying blood-based biomarkers that can differentiate lung cancer from benign disease nodules [7]. A recent publication highlights the clinical validation and performance of a novel, multiplexed, plasma protein signature as a risk assessment tool [8]. The authors established the assay’s ability to aid in correctly identifying the risk of malignancy for a pulmonary nodule that falls into the inconclusive intermediate risk for lung cancer as calculated by the VA Clinical Factors Model [9]. The assay was evaluated with a set of 277 samples, all from current smokers with an indeterminate pulmonary nodule 4-30 mm in diameter from which an algorithm was defined for risk classification. The assay and algorithm were then evaluated in an independent validation cohort of 97 subjects [8]. Among the 97 validation study subjects, 68 were grouped as having intermediate risk by the VA model. The biomarker algorithmbased test correctly identified 44 (65%) of these intermediate-risk samples as lower risk (n = 16) or higher risk (n = 28). The test showed a sensitivity of 94% and a negative predictive value (NPV) of 94% [8] in the intended use population having a cancer prevalence rate of 25% [10]. Almost all subjects (98%) had early stage disease as defined by lung cancer Stage I or II [8]. The novel blood test demonstrated efficacy in accurately identifying patients at low risk of lung cancer to rule-out the need for risky aggressive actions. Thus, the plasma protein assay has the potential to aid clinicians to more accurately characterize radiologically-indeterminate pulmonary nodules in current smokers Smester G (2019) Overcoming the pitfalls of current lung cancer risk assessment: Improved lung nodule characterization by a novel plasma protein biomarker test Volume 3: 2-4 Biomed Res Rev, 2019 doi: 10.15761/BRR.1000125 and help provide additional insight to support a more informed clinical decision about performing an invasive evaluation of the patient’s lung nodule [8]. Case report: Peace of mind for patient and provider The REVEAL test aids decision making and reduces the psychologic toll of uncertainty in a patient with indeterminate lung nodules and prevents unnecessary risky interventions. A 73-year-old male from the Dominican Republic presented on August 2, 2018 complaining of a dry cough and shortness of breath on exertion as well as hypertension, back and neck pain and leg cramps. He was diagnosed with COPD/Emphysema in the Dominican Republic 5 years before presenting to the clinic. He brought with him a thoracic CT (performed on 4/17/18) from his country demonstrating combined emphysema and interstitial lung disease (ILD) with reticulonodular densities in the posterior lateral right mid lung, exhibiting ground glass airspace opacities, fibrosis, and bullous disease concentrated primarily in the upper lobes. The patient had a 25-year history of smoking two packs of cigarettes per day, and over 50 years of occupational exposure to wheat flour in a factory. He had a history of gout but denied any active symptoms. The patient reported home oxygen saturations in the 80s and poor compliance with supplemental oxygen and prescribed inhalers including LABA/IC and SABA. He denied chest tightness or wheezing. His surgical history is remarkable for right shoulder rotator cuff repair, a procedure on his right wrist, and hammertoe repair. Previous blood work indicated renal insufficiency and hyponatremia, which the patient confirmed are chronic. He denied any allergies, asbestos exposure, or recreational history with lung irritants. He stated he has five domesticated dogs at his home. The patient is divorced. His social history includes daily alcohol use. He is currently retired. His family history includes a grandfather with diabetes and a brother with hypertension, obstructive sleep apnea, and psoriasis. The patient also reported several relatives with a history of colon cancer which prompts him to undergo a colonoscopy every 2 years. His physical exam was significant for slight prolonged expiration and 1+ pitting edema in both lower extremities. No rhonchus, wheezing or crackles were evident. Spirometry performed exposed small airway disease and restrictive lung disease, but not a pattern of COPD. Pulmonary function tests were ordered which revealed restrictive pattern, small airway disease and decreased DLCO. A review of symptoms was positive for acid reflux treated with Prilosec. No collagen vascular disease was evident except for mild elevation of CRP and ESR. A baseline polysomnograph was positive for severe obstructive sleep apnea syndrome. A thoracic CT was performed on August 3, 2018 per chest ILD protocol and showed bullous disease and ground glass opacification. Additionally, a dominant 7x5 mm, spiculated, LUL nodule was described for the first time. The patient was referred to the Mayo Clinic in Jacksonville, Florida for an open lung biopsy to characterize his lung pathology. However, due to his increased risk of bleeding from pulmonary hypertension, it was deferred. A repeat chest CT at Mayo Clinic in September 2018 was consistent with the findings previously described, including the lung nodule. The patient opted for surveillance of the nodule and medical management with a course of prednisone for the ILD. On October 15, 2018 a novel multiplexed, plasma-protein assay – REVEAL -was ordered to better characterize the patient’s indeterminate lung nodule found on CT. His pre-test probability, calculated by the VA Clinical Factors Model, indicted 53%, placing the patient’s risk of malignancy in the intermediate risk range. A simple, venous blood draw in the office was conducted and the plasma sent to the CLIA certified testing laboratory. The assay result was provided within three days as a score of 34 (Figure 1) indicating a 94% probability the patient’s nodule was lower-risk, benign disease. Based on this new information, the patient agreed with us to proceed with a serial surveillance strategy. Three months later, a follow up thoracic CT was performed indicating resolution of the ILD and reduction of the size of the LUL nodule to 6.2 × 2.8 mm. The prednisone was reduced and CellCept was added. From a pulmonary standpoint, the patient continues to do well. He is scheduled to return to the clinic in four months for a full PFT and a chest CT.