两阶段过程的两阶段模型:传记可用性如何影响社会运动动员

IF 1.3 2区社会学 Q3 SOCIOLOGY Mobilization Pub Date : 2006-10-01 DOI:10.17813/MAIQ.11.3.8P1758741377684U

Kraig Beyerlein, John R. Hipp

{"title":"两阶段过程的两阶段模型:传记可用性如何影响社会运动动员","authors":"Kraig Beyerlein, John R. Hipp","doi":"10.17813/MAIQ.11.3.8P1758741377684U","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Author(s): Beyerlein, K; Hipp, JR | Abstract: We model differential participation in protest as a two-stage mobilization process: willingness to engage in protest and conversion of willingness into participation. Treating mobilization as a two-stage process resolves an important puzzle in the literature on differential participation: the lack of constraining effects for biographical unavailability. Using a nationally representative sample of individuals in the United States, we find that while our measures of biographical unavailability have no effect on the second stage of the mobilization process (converting willingness to protest to actual behavior), they show robust negative effects on the first stage of the mobilization process, removing people from the pool of willing protest participants. We also find that gender moderates the relationship between some of our measures of biographical unavailability - particularly marital status - and protest willingness. © Mobilization: An International Journal.","PeriodicalId":47309,"journal":{"name":"Mobilization","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2006-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.17813/MAIQ.11.3.8P1758741377684U","citationCount":"116","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A Two-Stage Model for a Two-Stage Process: How Biographical Availability Matters for Social Movement Mobilization\",\"authors\":\"Kraig Beyerlein, John R. Hipp\",\"doi\":\"10.17813/MAIQ.11.3.8P1758741377684U\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Author(s): Beyerlein, K; Hipp, JR | Abstract: We model differential participation in protest as a two-stage mobilization process: willingness to engage in protest and conversion of willingness into participation. Treating mobilization as a two-stage process resolves an important puzzle in the literature on differential participation: the lack of constraining effects for biographical unavailability. Using a nationally representative sample of individuals in the United States, we find that while our measures of biographical unavailability have no effect on the second stage of the mobilization process (converting willingness to protest to actual behavior), they show robust negative effects on the first stage of the mobilization process, removing people from the pool of willing protest participants. We also find that gender moderates the relationship between some of our measures of biographical unavailability - particularly marital status - and protest willingness. © Mobilization: An International Journal.\",\"PeriodicalId\":47309,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Mobilization\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2006-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.17813/MAIQ.11.3.8P1758741377684U\",\"citationCount\":\"116\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Mobilization\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"90\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.17813/MAIQ.11.3.8P1758741377684U\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"社会学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"SOCIOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Mobilization","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.17813/MAIQ.11.3.8P1758741377684U","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"SOCIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 116

摘要

作者:Beyerlein, K;摘要:我们将抗议的差异参与建模为一个两阶段的动员过程:参与抗议的意愿和意愿转化为参与。将动员作为一个两阶段的过程解决了文献中关于差异参与的一个重要难题:缺乏对传记不可得性的约束效应。通过对美国具有全国代表性的个体样本的研究，我们发现，虽然我们的传记不可得性测量对动员过程的第二阶段(将抗议意愿转化为实际行为)没有影响，但它们对动员过程的第一阶段显示出强大的负面影响，将人们从愿意抗议的参与者中剔除。我们还发现，性别调节了我们的一些衡量传记不可得性(尤其是婚姻状况)和抗议意愿之间的关系。©动员:国际期刊。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

查看原文

微信好友朋友圈 QQ好友复制链接

本刊更多论文

A Two-Stage Model for a Two-Stage Process: How Biographical Availability Matters for Social Movement Mobilization

Author(s): Beyerlein, K; Hipp, JR | Abstract: We model differential participation in protest as a two-stage mobilization process: willingness to engage in protest and conversion of willingness into participation. Treating mobilization as a two-stage process resolves an important puzzle in the literature on differential participation: the lack of constraining effects for biographical unavailability. Using a nationally representative sample of individuals in the United States, we find that while our measures of biographical unavailability have no effect on the second stage of the mobilization process (converting willingness to protest to actual behavior), they show robust negative effects on the first stage of the mobilization process, removing people from the pool of willing protest participants. We also find that gender moderates the relationship between some of our measures of biographical unavailability - particularly marital status - and protest willingness. © Mobilization: An International Journal.

求助全文

通过发布文献求助，成功后即可免费获取论文全文。去求助

来源期刊

Mobilization SOCIOLOGY-

CiteScore

3.80

自引率

0.00%

发文量

期刊介绍： Mobilization: An International Quarterly is the premier journal of research specializing in social movements, protests, insurgencies, revolutions, and other forms of contentious politics. Mobilization was first published in 1996 to fill the need for a scholarly review of research that focused exclusively with social movements, protest and collective action. Mobilization is fully peer-reviewed and widely indexed. A 2003 study, when Mobilization was published semiannually, showed that its citation index rate was 1.286, which placed it among the top ten sociology journals. Today, Mobilization is published four times a year, in March, June, September, and December. The editorial board is composed of thirty internationally recognized scholars from political science, sociology and social psychology. The goal of Mobilization is to provide a forum for global, scholarly dialogue. It is currently distributed to the top international research libraries and read by the most engaged scholars in the field. We hope that through its wide distribution, different research strategies and theoretical/conceptual approaches will be shared among the global community of social movement scholars, encouraging a collaborative process that will further the development of a cumulative social science.