引言:抗议的镇压和社会控制

IF 1.3 2区 社会学 Q3 SOCIOLOGY Mobilization Pub Date : 2006-08-04 DOI:10.17813/MAIQ.11.2.B55GM84032815278
J. Earl
{"title":"引言:抗议的镇压和社会控制","authors":"J. Earl","doi":"10.17813/MAIQ.11.2.B55GM84032815278","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Of the phenomena studied by social scientists, few are as potent and moving as scenes of collective action under threats of repression. For instance, the commitment to political and social change that civil rights activists showed by day, with full knowledge that the wrath of the KKK might befall them by night, is a moving testament to their courage and perseverance. And yet, prior to the last decade, research on repression had been somewhat slower to develop when compared with other areas of social movement scholarship. Fortunately, the tide has dramatically shifted over the last decade. A large amount of research has been published recently on repression and the social control of protest: Davenport, Johnston, and Mueller (2005) published the proceedings of a 2001 conference on repression; della Porta and Reiter’s (1998) edited volume introduced a number of important claims and findings about protest policing; and a number of important articles have appeared in peer-reviewed journals (e.g., Earl 2003, 2004; Earl, Soule, and McCarthy 2003; Francisco 2004; Loveman 1998; Rasler 1996). In fact, this special issue stems, in part, from papers delivered at a session on repression at the 2004 Annual Meetings of the American Sociological Association. In this introduction, I assess the fruits of this boom in repression-related research with an eye toward what theories and findings have been supported, what new research trajectories are particularly important, and what areas are still relatively underdeveloped. At the same time, I introduce the seven original research articles that comprise this special issue, pointing to the themes in the existing literature that they productively speak to or question. I will also point out the common themes within the articles that make the special issue more than the sum of its parts by collectively pointing to emergent issues in repressionrelated research.","PeriodicalId":47309,"journal":{"name":"Mobilization","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2006-08-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.17813/MAIQ.11.2.B55GM84032815278","citationCount":"75","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Introduction: Repression and the Social Control of Protest\",\"authors\":\"J. Earl\",\"doi\":\"10.17813/MAIQ.11.2.B55GM84032815278\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Of the phenomena studied by social scientists, few are as potent and moving as scenes of collective action under threats of repression. For instance, the commitment to political and social change that civil rights activists showed by day, with full knowledge that the wrath of the KKK might befall them by night, is a moving testament to their courage and perseverance. And yet, prior to the last decade, research on repression had been somewhat slower to develop when compared with other areas of social movement scholarship. Fortunately, the tide has dramatically shifted over the last decade. A large amount of research has been published recently on repression and the social control of protest: Davenport, Johnston, and Mueller (2005) published the proceedings of a 2001 conference on repression; della Porta and Reiter’s (1998) edited volume introduced a number of important claims and findings about protest policing; and a number of important articles have appeared in peer-reviewed journals (e.g., Earl 2003, 2004; Earl, Soule, and McCarthy 2003; Francisco 2004; Loveman 1998; Rasler 1996). In fact, this special issue stems, in part, from papers delivered at a session on repression at the 2004 Annual Meetings of the American Sociological Association. In this introduction, I assess the fruits of this boom in repression-related research with an eye toward what theories and findings have been supported, what new research trajectories are particularly important, and what areas are still relatively underdeveloped. At the same time, I introduce the seven original research articles that comprise this special issue, pointing to the themes in the existing literature that they productively speak to or question. I will also point out the common themes within the articles that make the special issue more than the sum of its parts by collectively pointing to emergent issues in repressionrelated research.\",\"PeriodicalId\":47309,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Mobilization\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2006-08-04\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.17813/MAIQ.11.2.B55GM84032815278\",\"citationCount\":\"75\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Mobilization\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"90\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.17813/MAIQ.11.2.B55GM84032815278\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"社会学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"SOCIOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Mobilization","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.17813/MAIQ.11.2.B55GM84032815278","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"SOCIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 75

摘要

在社会科学家所研究的现象中,很少有像在镇压威胁下集体行动的场景那样有力和感人的。例如,民权活动人士在白天表现出对政治和社会变革的承诺,他们完全知道三k党的愤怒可能会在晚上降临到他们身上,这是他们勇气和毅力的感人证明。然而,在过去十年之前,与社会运动学术的其他领域相比,对镇压的研究发展得有些缓慢。幸运的是,这一趋势在过去十年中发生了巨大的变化。最近发表了大量关于镇压和抗议的社会控制的研究:Davenport, Johnston和Mueller(2005)发表了2001年镇压会议的会议记录;della Porta和Reiter(1998)的编辑卷介绍了一些关于抗议警察的重要主张和发现;一些重要的文章出现在同行评议的期刊上(例如,Earl 2003, 2004;厄尔,索勒和麦卡锡2003;旧金山2004;Loveman 1998;Rasler 1996)。事实上,这期特刊部分源于2004年美国社会学协会(American Sociological Association)年度会议上发表的一篇关于压制的论文。在这篇引言中,我评估了抑郁症相关研究的繁荣成果,着眼于哪些理论和发现得到了支持,哪些新的研究轨迹特别重要,以及哪些领域仍然相对不发达。同时,我介绍了组成本期特刊的七篇原创研究文章,指出了他们富有成效地讨论或质疑的现有文献中的主题。我还将指出文章中的共同主题,这些主题通过集体指出与压抑相关的研究中的新问题,使特别问题超过其部分的总和。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Introduction: Repression and the Social Control of Protest
Of the phenomena studied by social scientists, few are as potent and moving as scenes of collective action under threats of repression. For instance, the commitment to political and social change that civil rights activists showed by day, with full knowledge that the wrath of the KKK might befall them by night, is a moving testament to their courage and perseverance. And yet, prior to the last decade, research on repression had been somewhat slower to develop when compared with other areas of social movement scholarship. Fortunately, the tide has dramatically shifted over the last decade. A large amount of research has been published recently on repression and the social control of protest: Davenport, Johnston, and Mueller (2005) published the proceedings of a 2001 conference on repression; della Porta and Reiter’s (1998) edited volume introduced a number of important claims and findings about protest policing; and a number of important articles have appeared in peer-reviewed journals (e.g., Earl 2003, 2004; Earl, Soule, and McCarthy 2003; Francisco 2004; Loveman 1998; Rasler 1996). In fact, this special issue stems, in part, from papers delivered at a session on repression at the 2004 Annual Meetings of the American Sociological Association. In this introduction, I assess the fruits of this boom in repression-related research with an eye toward what theories and findings have been supported, what new research trajectories are particularly important, and what areas are still relatively underdeveloped. At the same time, I introduce the seven original research articles that comprise this special issue, pointing to the themes in the existing literature that they productively speak to or question. I will also point out the common themes within the articles that make the special issue more than the sum of its parts by collectively pointing to emergent issues in repressionrelated research.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Mobilization
Mobilization SOCIOLOGY-
CiteScore
3.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
21
期刊介绍: Mobilization: An International Quarterly is the premier journal of research specializing in social movements, protests, insurgencies, revolutions, and other forms of contentious politics. Mobilization was first published in 1996 to fill the need for a scholarly review of research that focused exclusively with social movements, protest and collective action. Mobilization is fully peer-reviewed and widely indexed. A 2003 study, when Mobilization was published semiannually, showed that its citation index rate was 1.286, which placed it among the top ten sociology journals. Today, Mobilization is published four times a year, in March, June, September, and December. The editorial board is composed of thirty internationally recognized scholars from political science, sociology and social psychology. The goal of Mobilization is to provide a forum for global, scholarly dialogue. It is currently distributed to the top international research libraries and read by the most engaged scholars in the field. We hope that through its wide distribution, different research strategies and theoretical/conceptual approaches will be shared among the global community of social movement scholars, encouraging a collaborative process that will further the development of a cumulative social science.
期刊最新文献
THE INDOCTRINATION DIMENSION OF REPRESSION: TELEVISED CONFESSIONS IN CHINA* CATALOGING PROTEST: NEWSPAPERS, NEXIS UNI, OR TWITTER?* A LONGITUDINAL APPROACH TO ONLINE “COLLECTIVE IDENTITY WORK”: THE CASE OF THE GILETS JAUNES IN THE VAR DEPARTMENT* STRATEGIC ALLIANCES: THE POLITICAL EFFICACY OF RELIGIOUSSECULAR TIES* GAINS AND LOSSES IN THE URBAN POLITICAL FIELD: MULTILAYERED OUTCOMES OF MOBILIZATION IN MOSCOW’S HOUSING CONTROVERSY*
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1