非洲高山植物的叶片功能特征与其他高山植物不同吗?

Q3 Environmental Science Botanica Pacifica Pub Date : 2023-01-01 DOI:10.17581/bp.2023.12201
V. Onipchenko, Aliy M. Kipkeev, N. Kopylova, Justine M. Nyaga, T. Elumeeva, K. V. Dudova, A. A. Akhmetzhanova, A. Tiunov, M. Karpukhin, M. Makarov
{"title":"非洲高山植物的叶片功能特征与其他高山植物不同吗?","authors":"V. Onipchenko, Aliy M. Kipkeev, N. Kopylova, Justine M. Nyaga, T. Elumeeva, K. V. Dudova, A. A. Akhmetzhanova, A. Tiunov, M. Karpukhin, M. Makarov","doi":"10.17581/bp.2023.12201","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Afroalpine plants develop under specific climate with great daily fluctuations and weak seasonal dynamics of temperature. Do leaf functional traits of the plants in Mt. Kenya differ from those of temperate plants in NW Caucasus? To answer this question, we conducted a comparative study at the Teleki valley (4000–4500 m a.s.l.), Mt. Kenya, Kenya, and Teberda national park (2600–2900 m a.s.l.), the Caucasus, Russia. We measured leaf area, fresh and dry mass, C, N, P, δ13C, δ15N and derivative traits (specific leaf area – SLA, leaf dry matter content – LDMC, C:N and N:P ratios) for 48 species at the Teleki valley, and the same traits, except for the δ13C and δ15N, for 141 species in the Teberda national park. The CSR-strategies scores were calculated. We applied the Principal Component Analysis to reveal the main patterns of trait variation. Leaf dry mass of Mt. Kenya alpine plants ranged from 0.27 mg (Sagina afroalpina) to 14.0 g (Dendrosenecio keniodendron). Leaf area, mass and LDMC of alpine plants in both regions did not differ significantly. The SLA of Mt. Kenya’s plants varied about 20-fold: from 2.6 mm2 mg-1 (Festuca pilgeri) to 39.8 mm2 mg-1 (Cineraria deltoidea), and Caucasian plants had higher SLA. N and P leaf concentrations were higher, but C lower in Caucasian plants than in Kenyan. Leaf N:P ratio was similar for both regions, while C:N ratio was higher in Kenyan plants. Species of “rosette” trees (Dendrosenecio spp.) differed from other species by size characteristics (maximal leaf dry mass and area were in Dendrosenecio keniodendron), as well as correspondingly higher investment to mechanical tissues (high C:N ratio, low SLA). By the other functional traits, “rosette” trees were similar to many other alpine plants. Thus, afroalpine plants of Mt. Kenya are close to temperate alpine plants by some leaf functional traits, but possess higher stress-tolerance.","PeriodicalId":37724,"journal":{"name":"Botanica Pacifica","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Do afroalpine plants differ from other alpine plants by their leaf functional traits?\",\"authors\":\"V. Onipchenko, Aliy M. Kipkeev, N. Kopylova, Justine M. Nyaga, T. Elumeeva, K. V. Dudova, A. A. Akhmetzhanova, A. Tiunov, M. Karpukhin, M. Makarov\",\"doi\":\"10.17581/bp.2023.12201\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Afroalpine plants develop under specific climate with great daily fluctuations and weak seasonal dynamics of temperature. Do leaf functional traits of the plants in Mt. Kenya differ from those of temperate plants in NW Caucasus? To answer this question, we conducted a comparative study at the Teleki valley (4000–4500 m a.s.l.), Mt. Kenya, Kenya, and Teberda national park (2600–2900 m a.s.l.), the Caucasus, Russia. We measured leaf area, fresh and dry mass, C, N, P, δ13C, δ15N and derivative traits (specific leaf area – SLA, leaf dry matter content – LDMC, C:N and N:P ratios) for 48 species at the Teleki valley, and the same traits, except for the δ13C and δ15N, for 141 species in the Teberda national park. The CSR-strategies scores were calculated. We applied the Principal Component Analysis to reveal the main patterns of trait variation. Leaf dry mass of Mt. Kenya alpine plants ranged from 0.27 mg (Sagina afroalpina) to 14.0 g (Dendrosenecio keniodendron). Leaf area, mass and LDMC of alpine plants in both regions did not differ significantly. The SLA of Mt. Kenya’s plants varied about 20-fold: from 2.6 mm2 mg-1 (Festuca pilgeri) to 39.8 mm2 mg-1 (Cineraria deltoidea), and Caucasian plants had higher SLA. N and P leaf concentrations were higher, but C lower in Caucasian plants than in Kenyan. Leaf N:P ratio was similar for both regions, while C:N ratio was higher in Kenyan plants. Species of “rosette” trees (Dendrosenecio spp.) differed from other species by size characteristics (maximal leaf dry mass and area were in Dendrosenecio keniodendron), as well as correspondingly higher investment to mechanical tissues (high C:N ratio, low SLA). By the other functional traits, “rosette” trees were similar to many other alpine plants. Thus, afroalpine plants of Mt. Kenya are close to temperate alpine plants by some leaf functional traits, but possess higher stress-tolerance.\",\"PeriodicalId\":37724,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Botanica Pacifica\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Botanica Pacifica\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.17581/bp.2023.12201\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"Environmental Science\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Botanica Pacifica","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.17581/bp.2023.12201","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Environmental Science","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

非洲高山植物在特定的气候条件下生长,温度日波动大,季节动态弱。肯尼亚山植物的叶片功能特征与西北高加索温带植物的叶片功能特征不同吗?为了回答这个问题,我们在肯尼亚山的Teleki山谷(海拔高度4000-4500米)和俄罗斯高加索地区的Teberda国家公园(海拔高度2600-2900米)进行了比较研究。本文测定了Teleki流域48种植物的叶面积、鲜干质量、C、N、P、δ13C、δ15N及其衍生性状(比叶面积- SLA、叶干物质含量- LDMC、C:N和N:P比值)和Teberda国家公园141种植物的相同性状(δ13C和δ15N除外)。计算企业社会责任策略得分。应用主成分分析揭示了性状变异的主要模式。肯尼亚山高山植物的叶片干质量从0.27 mg (Sagina afroalpina)到14.0 g (Dendrosenecio keniodendron)不等。两区高山植物叶面积、叶质量和LDMC差异不显著。肯尼亚山植物的SLA变化幅度约为20倍,从2.6 mm2 mg-1(羊茅)到39.8 mm2 mg-1(凤尾草),高加索植物的SLA更高。高加索植物叶片氮、磷浓度高于肯尼亚植物,而碳浓度低于肯尼亚植物。两个地区的叶片氮磷比相似,而肯尼亚植物的碳氮比更高。蔷薇树(Dendrosenecio spp.)不同于其他树种的大小特征(叶片干质量和面积最大的是Dendrosenecio keniodendron),以及相应的机械组织投入(高C:N比,低SLA)。在其他功能性状上,“莲座”树与许多其他高山植物相似。因此,肯尼亚山非洲高山植物在某些叶片功能性状上接近温带高山植物,但具有更高的抗逆性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Do afroalpine plants differ from other alpine plants by their leaf functional traits?
Afroalpine plants develop under specific climate with great daily fluctuations and weak seasonal dynamics of temperature. Do leaf functional traits of the plants in Mt. Kenya differ from those of temperate plants in NW Caucasus? To answer this question, we conducted a comparative study at the Teleki valley (4000–4500 m a.s.l.), Mt. Kenya, Kenya, and Teberda national park (2600–2900 m a.s.l.), the Caucasus, Russia. We measured leaf area, fresh and dry mass, C, N, P, δ13C, δ15N and derivative traits (specific leaf area – SLA, leaf dry matter content – LDMC, C:N and N:P ratios) for 48 species at the Teleki valley, and the same traits, except for the δ13C and δ15N, for 141 species in the Teberda national park. The CSR-strategies scores were calculated. We applied the Principal Component Analysis to reveal the main patterns of trait variation. Leaf dry mass of Mt. Kenya alpine plants ranged from 0.27 mg (Sagina afroalpina) to 14.0 g (Dendrosenecio keniodendron). Leaf area, mass and LDMC of alpine plants in both regions did not differ significantly. The SLA of Mt. Kenya’s plants varied about 20-fold: from 2.6 mm2 mg-1 (Festuca pilgeri) to 39.8 mm2 mg-1 (Cineraria deltoidea), and Caucasian plants had higher SLA. N and P leaf concentrations were higher, but C lower in Caucasian plants than in Kenyan. Leaf N:P ratio was similar for both regions, while C:N ratio was higher in Kenyan plants. Species of “rosette” trees (Dendrosenecio spp.) differed from other species by size characteristics (maximal leaf dry mass and area were in Dendrosenecio keniodendron), as well as correspondingly higher investment to mechanical tissues (high C:N ratio, low SLA). By the other functional traits, “rosette” trees were similar to many other alpine plants. Thus, afroalpine plants of Mt. Kenya are close to temperate alpine plants by some leaf functional traits, but possess higher stress-tolerance.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Botanica Pacifica
Botanica Pacifica Environmental Science-Ecology
CiteScore
1.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
11
期刊介绍: Botanica Pacifica (BP) publishes peer-reviewed, significant research of interest to a wide audience of plant scientists in all areas of plant biology (structure, function, development, diversity, genetics, evolution, systematics), all levels of organization (molecular to ecosystem), and all plant groups and allied organisms (cyanobacteria, fungi, and lichens). BP requires authors to frame their research questions and discuss their results in terms of contemporary problems of plant biology. While the geographic focus of the journal is the Pacific region, research submissions that demonstrate clear linkages with other regions are welcome. BP aims to foster the exchange of research ideas between countries with diverse cultures and languages.
期刊最新文献
Diatoms (Bacillariophyta) of the Tolmachev reservoir (Kamchatka, Russia) New varieties of Elymus ciliaris (Poaceae: Triticeae) from the Russian Far East The CSR strategies of alpine plants and community functional diversity in the Eastern Qinghai-Tibetan mountains Carici arctisibiricae–Hylocomietea alaskani – a new class of zonal tundra vegetation New syntaxa of tundra vegetation in the Siberian sector of the Arctic
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1