{"title":"论朝鲜语多主语结构的限制性质","authors":"Jeong-Me Yoon","doi":"10.17250/khisli.35.3.201812.001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Yoon, Jeong-Me. 2018. On the nature of the restrictions for Multiple Subject Constructions in Korean. Linguistic Research 35(3), 415-447. In this paper, I discuss two different approaches to the Characteristic Property Condition for Multiple Subject Constructions in Korean, i.e., the interpretive approach and the processing approach. Assuming that the CPC is the ultimate condition for MSCs, the former claims that the CPC holds due to the special interpretive properties of SpecIP in Korean while according to the latter, the CPC is a processing restriction for filler-gap constructions incurring heavy processing loads. In this paper, I provide four arguments for the latter: (i) the processing approach can better explain the sub-restrictions figuring in the CPC; (ii) the processing approach can better explain the cumulative nature of the sub-restrictions figuring in the CPC; (iii) the processing approach can better explain the fact that the CPC holds for various filler-gap constructions in Korean other than MSCs; (iv) the processing approach can better explain the fact that the CPC also holds for filler-gap constructions in languages like English which lack pro. One syntactic implication of my claim is that simply appealing to the availability of base-generated pro chains cannot be an answer for the absence of island effects observed in many constructions in Korean including MSCs. (Myongji University)","PeriodicalId":43095,"journal":{"name":"Linguistic Research","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.4000,"publicationDate":"2018-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"On the nature of the restrictions for Multiple Subject Constructions in Korean\",\"authors\":\"Jeong-Me Yoon\",\"doi\":\"10.17250/khisli.35.3.201812.001\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Yoon, Jeong-Me. 2018. On the nature of the restrictions for Multiple Subject Constructions in Korean. Linguistic Research 35(3), 415-447. In this paper, I discuss two different approaches to the Characteristic Property Condition for Multiple Subject Constructions in Korean, i.e., the interpretive approach and the processing approach. Assuming that the CPC is the ultimate condition for MSCs, the former claims that the CPC holds due to the special interpretive properties of SpecIP in Korean while according to the latter, the CPC is a processing restriction for filler-gap constructions incurring heavy processing loads. In this paper, I provide four arguments for the latter: (i) the processing approach can better explain the sub-restrictions figuring in the CPC; (ii) the processing approach can better explain the cumulative nature of the sub-restrictions figuring in the CPC; (iii) the processing approach can better explain the fact that the CPC holds for various filler-gap constructions in Korean other than MSCs; (iv) the processing approach can better explain the fact that the CPC also holds for filler-gap constructions in languages like English which lack pro. One syntactic implication of my claim is that simply appealing to the availability of base-generated pro chains cannot be an answer for the absence of island effects observed in many constructions in Korean including MSCs. (Myongji University)\",\"PeriodicalId\":43095,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Linguistic Research\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2018-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Linguistic Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1092\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.17250/khisli.35.3.201812.001\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Linguistic Research","FirstCategoryId":"1092","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.17250/khisli.35.3.201812.001","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
On the nature of the restrictions for Multiple Subject Constructions in Korean
Yoon, Jeong-Me. 2018. On the nature of the restrictions for Multiple Subject Constructions in Korean. Linguistic Research 35(3), 415-447. In this paper, I discuss two different approaches to the Characteristic Property Condition for Multiple Subject Constructions in Korean, i.e., the interpretive approach and the processing approach. Assuming that the CPC is the ultimate condition for MSCs, the former claims that the CPC holds due to the special interpretive properties of SpecIP in Korean while according to the latter, the CPC is a processing restriction for filler-gap constructions incurring heavy processing loads. In this paper, I provide four arguments for the latter: (i) the processing approach can better explain the sub-restrictions figuring in the CPC; (ii) the processing approach can better explain the cumulative nature of the sub-restrictions figuring in the CPC; (iii) the processing approach can better explain the fact that the CPC holds for various filler-gap constructions in Korean other than MSCs; (iv) the processing approach can better explain the fact that the CPC also holds for filler-gap constructions in languages like English which lack pro. One syntactic implication of my claim is that simply appealing to the availability of base-generated pro chains cannot be an answer for the absence of island effects observed in many constructions in Korean including MSCs. (Myongji University)
期刊介绍:
Linguistic Research is an international journal which offers a forum for the discussion of theoretical research dealing with natural language data. The journal publishes articles of high quality which make a clear contribution to current debate in all branches of theoretical linguistics. The journal embraces both synchronic and diachronic perspectives, and carries articles that address language-specific as well as cross-linguistic and typological research questions. The journal features syntax, semantics, morphology, phonology, phonetics, and pragmatics and is currently published quarterly (March, June, September, and December), including the special September issue with a particular focus on applied linguistics covering (second) language acquisition, ESL/EFL, conversation/discourse analysis, etc. All submitted manuscripts are subject to initial evaluation by the Editors, and, if found suitable for further consideration, to double-blind peer review by independent expert referees.