把水倒回来:

AlTalim Pub Date : 2012-02-20 DOI:10.15548/JT.V19I1.1
Duski Samad
{"title":"把水倒回来:","authors":"Duski Samad","doi":"10.15548/JT.V19I1.1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The existence of religious science and general science has been the long discourse that reduced the scientific world.  The separation of these two sciences, often refers to as science dichotomy, has brought about serious implication not only to institutions and facilities, but also the main resources of these two branches. More serious implication of the separation of these two sciences has also created the gaps particularly on the superiority of the general science.  This unhealthy and lack of objective view to religious science may not be taken for granted; comprehensive explanations of scientific resources, scientific method, and the historical existence of the two branches should be explored to reshape it in a strong unity and complementary.","PeriodicalId":30614,"journal":{"name":"AlTalim","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2012-02-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"MEMBINGKAI KEMBALI ILMU: KAJIAN KRITIS TENTANG DIKHOTOMI ILMU\",\"authors\":\"Duski Samad\",\"doi\":\"10.15548/JT.V19I1.1\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The existence of religious science and general science has been the long discourse that reduced the scientific world.  The separation of these two sciences, often refers to as science dichotomy, has brought about serious implication not only to institutions and facilities, but also the main resources of these two branches. More serious implication of the separation of these two sciences has also created the gaps particularly on the superiority of the general science.  This unhealthy and lack of objective view to religious science may not be taken for granted; comprehensive explanations of scientific resources, scientific method, and the historical existence of the two branches should be explored to reshape it in a strong unity and complementary.\",\"PeriodicalId\":30614,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"AlTalim\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2012-02-20\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"AlTalim\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.15548/JT.V19I1.1\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"AlTalim","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15548/JT.V19I1.1","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

宗教科学和普通科学的存在一直是缩减科学世界的冗长论述。这两门科学的分离,通常被称为科学二分法,不仅给机构和设施带来了严重的影响,而且也给这两个分支的主要资源带来了严重的影响。更严重的是,这两门科学的分离也造成了差距,特别是在普通科学的优越性上。这种对宗教科学的不健康和缺乏客观的看法可能不是理所当然的;要对科学资源、科学方法和两个分支的历史存在进行综合解释,使之形成强统一、强互补的重塑。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
MEMBINGKAI KEMBALI ILMU: KAJIAN KRITIS TENTANG DIKHOTOMI ILMU
The existence of religious science and general science has been the long discourse that reduced the scientific world.  The separation of these two sciences, often refers to as science dichotomy, has brought about serious implication not only to institutions and facilities, but also the main resources of these two branches. More serious implication of the separation of these two sciences has also created the gaps particularly on the superiority of the general science.  This unhealthy and lack of objective view to religious science may not be taken for granted; comprehensive explanations of scientific resources, scientific method, and the historical existence of the two branches should be explored to reshape it in a strong unity and complementary.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
9
审稿时长
4 weeks
期刊最新文献
Self-Assessment in Exploring EFL Students’ Speaking Skill Empowering Education: Exploring Teachers’ Classroom Practices in Vocational Schools The Use of Small Group Discussion and Snowballing Techniques: An Effort to enhance EFL Students’ Self –Efficacy and Speaking Skill The Assessment of the Education Laboratory Performance by Using Balanced Score Card Method The Content Mastery among Islamic Education Teachers in Junior Islamic Secondary Schools in Surakarta
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1