番石榴品种叶面积估算的非破坏性模型

IF 1.2 4区 农林科学 Q2 AGRICULTURE, MULTIDISCIPLINARY Bragantia Pub Date : 2022-01-01 DOI:10.1590/1678-4499.20210342
Manoel Penachio Gonçalves, R. V. Ribeiro, L. Amorim
{"title":"番石榴品种叶面积估算的非破坏性模型","authors":"Manoel Penachio Gonçalves, R. V. Ribeiro, L. Amorim","doi":"10.1590/1678-4499.20210342","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Leaf area is a commonly used measurement in many agronomic studies, but its assessment is generally destructive, and then simple, accurate and non-destructive methods are really appreciated. The objective of this study was to develop a non-destructive model that could be used to estimate the leaf area of four guava (Psidium guajava L.) cultivars by using leaf linear dimensions. Leaves from guava cultivars ‘Paluma’, ‘Sassaoka’, ‘Século 21’, and ‘Tailandesa’ were sampled randomly from an experimental orchard. Leaf length and maximum leaf width were measured with a ruler in 120 leaves from each cultivar. Leaf areas were also measured with a leaf area meter. Linear and power models relating leaf area to length, width, and length × width were fitted to the data. The most precise models were regressed again with a new data set to validate the proposed models. The power model (y = 0.61 x1.06) using the length × width was more precise and accurate to estimate the leaf area of all four cultivars evaluated herein, grown in field or greenhouse conditions. When only one leaf dimension was used, the power model (y = 1.81 x1.93) using the width was the best-performing model. Although models with only one leaf dimension (length or width) have shown good performance for estimating the guava leaf area, models based on the leaf length × width were more precise.","PeriodicalId":9260,"journal":{"name":"Bragantia","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Non-destructive models for estimating leaf area of guava cultivars\",\"authors\":\"Manoel Penachio Gonçalves, R. V. Ribeiro, L. Amorim\",\"doi\":\"10.1590/1678-4499.20210342\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Leaf area is a commonly used measurement in many agronomic studies, but its assessment is generally destructive, and then simple, accurate and non-destructive methods are really appreciated. The objective of this study was to develop a non-destructive model that could be used to estimate the leaf area of four guava (Psidium guajava L.) cultivars by using leaf linear dimensions. Leaves from guava cultivars ‘Paluma’, ‘Sassaoka’, ‘Século 21’, and ‘Tailandesa’ were sampled randomly from an experimental orchard. Leaf length and maximum leaf width were measured with a ruler in 120 leaves from each cultivar. Leaf areas were also measured with a leaf area meter. Linear and power models relating leaf area to length, width, and length × width were fitted to the data. The most precise models were regressed again with a new data set to validate the proposed models. The power model (y = 0.61 x1.06) using the length × width was more precise and accurate to estimate the leaf area of all four cultivars evaluated herein, grown in field or greenhouse conditions. When only one leaf dimension was used, the power model (y = 1.81 x1.93) using the width was the best-performing model. Although models with only one leaf dimension (length or width) have shown good performance for estimating the guava leaf area, models based on the leaf length × width were more precise.\",\"PeriodicalId\":9260,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Bragantia\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Bragantia\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"97\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1590/1678-4499.20210342\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"农林科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"AGRICULTURE, MULTIDISCIPLINARY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Bragantia","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1590/1678-4499.20210342","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"AGRICULTURE, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

叶面积是许多农艺研究中常用的一种测量方法,但叶面积的评估通常是破坏性的,因此需要一种简便、准确、无损的方法。本研究的目的是建立一种基于叶片线性尺寸的非破坏性模型,用于估算4个番石榴品种的叶面积。从实验果园中随机抽取番石榴品种“Paluma”、“Sassaoka”、“ssamculo 21”和“Tailandesa”的叶子。用尺子测量各品种120片叶片的叶长和最大叶宽。用叶面积计测量叶面积。将叶面积与长度、宽度和长×宽的线性和幂模型拟合到数据中。用新的数据集对最精确的模型再次进行回归,以验证所提出的模型。利用长×宽的幂函数模型(y = 0.61 x1.06)对大田和温室条件下4个栽培品种的叶面积估算更为精确和准确。当只使用一个叶片维度时,使用宽度的功率模型(y = 1.81 x1.93)是表现最好的模型。虽然只有一个叶片尺寸(长度或宽度)的模型对番石榴叶面积的估计效果较好,但基于叶片长度×宽度的模型更为精确。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Non-destructive models for estimating leaf area of guava cultivars
Leaf area is a commonly used measurement in many agronomic studies, but its assessment is generally destructive, and then simple, accurate and non-destructive methods are really appreciated. The objective of this study was to develop a non-destructive model that could be used to estimate the leaf area of four guava (Psidium guajava L.) cultivars by using leaf linear dimensions. Leaves from guava cultivars ‘Paluma’, ‘Sassaoka’, ‘Século 21’, and ‘Tailandesa’ were sampled randomly from an experimental orchard. Leaf length and maximum leaf width were measured with a ruler in 120 leaves from each cultivar. Leaf areas were also measured with a leaf area meter. Linear and power models relating leaf area to length, width, and length × width were fitted to the data. The most precise models were regressed again with a new data set to validate the proposed models. The power model (y = 0.61 x1.06) using the length × width was more precise and accurate to estimate the leaf area of all four cultivars evaluated herein, grown in field or greenhouse conditions. When only one leaf dimension was used, the power model (y = 1.81 x1.93) using the width was the best-performing model. Although models with only one leaf dimension (length or width) have shown good performance for estimating the guava leaf area, models based on the leaf length × width were more precise.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Bragantia
Bragantia AGRICULTURE, MULTIDISCIPLINARY-
CiteScore
2.40
自引率
8.30%
发文量
33
审稿时长
4 weeks
期刊介绍: Bragantia é uma revista de ciências agronômicas editada pelo Instituto Agronômico da Agência Paulista de Tecnologia dos Agronegócios, da Secretaria de Agricultura e Abastecimento do Estado de São Paulo, com o objetivo de publicar trabalhos científicos originais que contribuam para o desenvolvimento das ciências agronômicas. A revista é publicada desde 1941, tornando-se semestral em 1984, quadrimestral em 2001 e trimestral em 2005. É filiada à Associação Brasileira de Editores Científicos (ABEC).
期刊最新文献
Corn straw return effectively improves the stability and increases the carbon and nitrogen contents of waterstable aggregates in northeastern China black soil Spermine decreases ethylene and increases sugars and phenolic compounds in nasturtium flowers grown under drought and salt stress Genetic divergence for seed traits in Passiflora full-sib families under recurrent selection for resistance to the cowpea aphid-borne mosaic virus Physiological and agronomic response of soybean cultivars to soil compaction in the Brazilian Cerrado Training systems improved agronomic characteristics and quality of ‘Niagara Rosada’ table grapes
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1