用于骨科术前规划的临床医生运行的3d打印实验室:一个说明性案例系列

R. Venter, L. Kotze, N. Ferreira
{"title":"用于骨科术前规划的临床医生运行的3d打印实验室:一个说明性案例系列","authors":"R. Venter, L. Kotze, N. Ferreira","doi":"10.17159/2309-8309/2022/v21n3a7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"BACKGROUND: Orthopaedic surgery often benefits from innovation in biomedical engineering, with 3D printing being one of the latest examples. Proving cost-effectiveness and improved clinical outcomes remains challenging. Because of the reduced cost and increased accessibility, it has been possible to start an orthopaedic 3D-printing laboratory in a South African tertiary hospital, exploring the place for this emergent technology in orthopaedic practice. This case series aims to illustrate the clinical use of 3D-printed anatomical models and investigate the time and cost involved in their manufacture METHODS: The design and manufacturing process is discussed, and a retrospective descriptive case series is presented of all models manufactured from January 2020 to April 2021. Using three illustrative cases, we elaborate on two main usage situations: intraoperative reference models (haptic maps) or rehearsal and templating (simulation models RESULTS: In the study, 3D-printed anatomical models were manufactured for 16 patients. For 12 patients, these were simulation models, and for the other four patients, haptic maps were made. The mean time for manufacture was 33 hours (range 8-62), and the median cost per patient was ZAR 3 257.62 (range ZAR 927.17 to ZAR 7 177.09 CONCLUSION: Considering the decreasing cost and ease of using 3D-printing technology, starting a clinician-run orthopaedic 3D-printing laboratory at a South African training hospital has become possible. In this series we illustrate how 3D printing has been used at our unit for planning and rehearsal of a wide range of orthopaedic cases, and we establish a baseline of time and cost expenditure. The cost-effectiveness of implementing 3D-printing technology in everyday orthopaedic practice warrants further investigation Level of evidence: Level 5","PeriodicalId":32220,"journal":{"name":"SA Orthopaedic Journal","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A clinician-run 3D-printing laboratory for orthopaedic preoperative planning: an illustrative case series\",\"authors\":\"R. Venter, L. Kotze, N. Ferreira\",\"doi\":\"10.17159/2309-8309/2022/v21n3a7\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"BACKGROUND: Orthopaedic surgery often benefits from innovation in biomedical engineering, with 3D printing being one of the latest examples. Proving cost-effectiveness and improved clinical outcomes remains challenging. Because of the reduced cost and increased accessibility, it has been possible to start an orthopaedic 3D-printing laboratory in a South African tertiary hospital, exploring the place for this emergent technology in orthopaedic practice. This case series aims to illustrate the clinical use of 3D-printed anatomical models and investigate the time and cost involved in their manufacture METHODS: The design and manufacturing process is discussed, and a retrospective descriptive case series is presented of all models manufactured from January 2020 to April 2021. Using three illustrative cases, we elaborate on two main usage situations: intraoperative reference models (haptic maps) or rehearsal and templating (simulation models RESULTS: In the study, 3D-printed anatomical models were manufactured for 16 patients. For 12 patients, these were simulation models, and for the other four patients, haptic maps were made. The mean time for manufacture was 33 hours (range 8-62), and the median cost per patient was ZAR 3 257.62 (range ZAR 927.17 to ZAR 7 177.09 CONCLUSION: Considering the decreasing cost and ease of using 3D-printing technology, starting a clinician-run orthopaedic 3D-printing laboratory at a South African training hospital has become possible. In this series we illustrate how 3D printing has been used at our unit for planning and rehearsal of a wide range of orthopaedic cases, and we establish a baseline of time and cost expenditure. The cost-effectiveness of implementing 3D-printing technology in everyday orthopaedic practice warrants further investigation Level of evidence: Level 5\",\"PeriodicalId\":32220,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"SA Orthopaedic Journal\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"SA Orthopaedic Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.17159/2309-8309/2022/v21n3a7\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"SA Orthopaedic Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.17159/2309-8309/2022/v21n3a7","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

背景:骨科手术往往受益于生物医学工程的创新,3D打印是最新的例子之一。证明成本效益和改善临床结果仍然具有挑战性。由于成本的降低和可及性的提高,在南非的一家三级医院建立了一个骨科3d打印实验室,探索这种新兴技术在骨科实践中的应用。本病例系列旨在说明3d打印解剖模型的临床应用,并调查其制造所涉及的时间和成本。方法:讨论了设计和制造过程,并介绍了2020年1月至2021年4月制造的所有模型的回顾性描述性病例系列。通过三个案例,我们阐述了两种主要的使用情况:术中参考模型(触觉图)或预演和模板(仿真模型)。结果:本研究为16例患者制作了3d打印解剖模型。对12名患者,这些是模拟模型,对其他4名患者,制作了触觉地图。平均制造时间为33小时(范围8-62),每位患者的中位成本为3257.62 ZAR(范围927.17 ZAR至7177.09 ZAR)。结论:考虑到成本下降和使用3d打印技术的便性,在南非培训医院建立临床运行的骨科3d打印实验室是可能的。在本系列中,我们将说明如何在我们的单位使用3D打印来规划和排练各种骨科病例,我们建立了时间和成本支出的基线。在日常骨科实践中实施3d打印技术的成本效益值得进一步调查。证据等级:5级
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
A clinician-run 3D-printing laboratory for orthopaedic preoperative planning: an illustrative case series
BACKGROUND: Orthopaedic surgery often benefits from innovation in biomedical engineering, with 3D printing being one of the latest examples. Proving cost-effectiveness and improved clinical outcomes remains challenging. Because of the reduced cost and increased accessibility, it has been possible to start an orthopaedic 3D-printing laboratory in a South African tertiary hospital, exploring the place for this emergent technology in orthopaedic practice. This case series aims to illustrate the clinical use of 3D-printed anatomical models and investigate the time and cost involved in their manufacture METHODS: The design and manufacturing process is discussed, and a retrospective descriptive case series is presented of all models manufactured from January 2020 to April 2021. Using three illustrative cases, we elaborate on two main usage situations: intraoperative reference models (haptic maps) or rehearsal and templating (simulation models RESULTS: In the study, 3D-printed anatomical models were manufactured for 16 patients. For 12 patients, these were simulation models, and for the other four patients, haptic maps were made. The mean time for manufacture was 33 hours (range 8-62), and the median cost per patient was ZAR 3 257.62 (range ZAR 927.17 to ZAR 7 177.09 CONCLUSION: Considering the decreasing cost and ease of using 3D-printing technology, starting a clinician-run orthopaedic 3D-printing laboratory at a South African training hospital has become possible. In this series we illustrate how 3D printing has been used at our unit for planning and rehearsal of a wide range of orthopaedic cases, and we establish a baseline of time and cost expenditure. The cost-effectiveness of implementing 3D-printing technology in everyday orthopaedic practice warrants further investigation Level of evidence: Level 5
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
SA Orthopaedic Journal
SA Orthopaedic Journal Medicine-Orthopedics and Sports Medicine
CiteScore
0.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
17
审稿时长
6 weeks
期刊最新文献
The Fassier technique for correction of proximal femoral deformity in children with osteogenesis imperfecta Factors associated with dissemination and complications of acute bone and joint infections in children Low dislocation rate one year after total hip arthroplasty at a tertiary hospital in South Africa Functional outcome of free fibula grafting in benign non-reconstructable bone tumours involving the hand A survey on the educational value of an mHealth referral app for orthopaedics in South Africa
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1