作为战略的欧洲化:瑞士的学科变迁与欧洲民族学的形成

Q1 Social Sciences Ethnologia Europaea Pub Date : 2015-01-01 DOI:10.16995/EE.1139
Konrad J Kuhn
{"title":"作为战略的欧洲化:瑞士的学科变迁与欧洲民族学的形成","authors":"Konrad J Kuhn","doi":"10.16995/EE.1139","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"eThnologia euroPaea 45:1 European ethnology has never been a coherent, conclusive discipline but has rather been a loose network of interests, topics and collaborations. This had already been the case as numerous institutions such as the Société Internationale d’Ethnologie et de Folklore (SIEF) and the journal Ethnologia Europaea were founded. Within these institutions, a small group of “Europeanists” that formed in the middle of the 1960s played an important role. A key member of this group was the Swiss-born Arnold Niederer (1914–1998). Not only was Niederer one of the founders of Ethnologia Europaea in 1966/67, he was also significantly involved in the formation of the loose network of actors who helped promote, share and establish European ethnology as a new discipline. Early on, Niederer saw himself as a European ethnologist; his comparative cross-cultural interests were present already well before the institutionalization of the corresponding research context. Thus, he is one of the pioneers of the discipline; a comparative perspective on the Alpine region and research on forms of cooperative work organized at the community level kindled his interest in European issues. Niederer was one of the researchers, together with Sigurd Erixon, Jorge Dias and others, who wanted to overcome divisions between the different national and local ethnologies in Europe and thus contributed to the network of European ethnology. In this process, they also reflected theoretically on the common – as well as distinct – characteristics of European ethnology across Europe. This paper examines the epistemological and institutional activities in the field of Volkskunde/ folklore studies in Switzerland leading to the discipline’s reformation as “European ethnology”. Drawing on archival materials, the article takes Arnold Niederer (1914–1998) as a starting point by showing how Niederer, his networks and research contexts were involved in the formation of the loose alliance of interests that were subsequently institutionalized. This paper traces the new perception of the discipline “European ethnology” as it draws on early transnational contacts of Swiss Folklore Studies in order to overcome the crisis in which Volkskunde found itself in the 1960s. Europeanization and an orientation toward the present were strategies to stabilize the academic discipline but also to establish the discipline in the public sphere.","PeriodicalId":34928,"journal":{"name":"Ethnologia Europaea","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2015-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Europeanization as Strategy : disciplinary shifts in Switzerland and the formation of European Ethnology\",\"authors\":\"Konrad J Kuhn\",\"doi\":\"10.16995/EE.1139\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"eThnologia euroPaea 45:1 European ethnology has never been a coherent, conclusive discipline but has rather been a loose network of interests, topics and collaborations. This had already been the case as numerous institutions such as the Société Internationale d’Ethnologie et de Folklore (SIEF) and the journal Ethnologia Europaea were founded. Within these institutions, a small group of “Europeanists” that formed in the middle of the 1960s played an important role. A key member of this group was the Swiss-born Arnold Niederer (1914–1998). Not only was Niederer one of the founders of Ethnologia Europaea in 1966/67, he was also significantly involved in the formation of the loose network of actors who helped promote, share and establish European ethnology as a new discipline. Early on, Niederer saw himself as a European ethnologist; his comparative cross-cultural interests were present already well before the institutionalization of the corresponding research context. Thus, he is one of the pioneers of the discipline; a comparative perspective on the Alpine region and research on forms of cooperative work organized at the community level kindled his interest in European issues. Niederer was one of the researchers, together with Sigurd Erixon, Jorge Dias and others, who wanted to overcome divisions between the different national and local ethnologies in Europe and thus contributed to the network of European ethnology. In this process, they also reflected theoretically on the common – as well as distinct – characteristics of European ethnology across Europe. This paper examines the epistemological and institutional activities in the field of Volkskunde/ folklore studies in Switzerland leading to the discipline’s reformation as “European ethnology”. Drawing on archival materials, the article takes Arnold Niederer (1914–1998) as a starting point by showing how Niederer, his networks and research contexts were involved in the formation of the loose alliance of interests that were subsequently institutionalized. This paper traces the new perception of the discipline “European ethnology” as it draws on early transnational contacts of Swiss Folklore Studies in order to overcome the crisis in which Volkskunde found itself in the 1960s. Europeanization and an orientation toward the present were strategies to stabilize the academic discipline but also to establish the discipline in the public sphere.\",\"PeriodicalId\":34928,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Ethnologia Europaea\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2015-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"3\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Ethnologia Europaea\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.16995/EE.1139\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"Social Sciences\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ethnologia Europaea","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.16995/EE.1139","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

摘要

欧洲民族学从来就不是一个连贯的、结论性的学科,而是一个由兴趣、主题和合作组成的松散网络。这种情况在许多机构成立时就已经出现了,例如国际民族学和民俗学学会(SIEF)和欧洲民族学杂志。在这些机构中,20世纪60年代中期形成的一小群“欧洲主义者”发挥了重要作用。这个团体的关键成员是瑞士出生的阿诺德·尼德勒(1914-1998)。尼德勒不仅是1966/67年《欧洲民族学》的创始人之一,他还积极参与了松散的行动者网络的形成,这些行动者帮助促进、分享和建立了欧洲民族学作为一门新学科。早期,尼德勒将自己视为欧洲民族学家;在相应的研究语境制度化之前,他的比较跨文化兴趣就已经存在了。因此,他是该学科的先驱之一;对阿尔卑斯地区的比较研究和对社区层面合作工作形式的研究激发了他对欧洲问题的兴趣。尼德勒与西格尔德·埃里克森、豪尔赫·迪亚斯等人一起,希望克服欧洲不同国家和地方民族学之间的分歧,从而为欧洲民族学网络做出贡献。在这一过程中,他们也从理论上反思了欧洲民族学在整个欧洲的共同特征——以及不同的特征。本文考察了瑞士民俗学研究领域的认识论和制度活动,这些活动导致了该学科作为“欧洲民族学”的改革。本文利用档案资料,以阿诺德·尼德勒(1914-1998)为起点,展示了尼德勒、他的网络和研究背景如何参与了后来制度化的松散的利益联盟的形成。本文追溯了“欧洲民族学”这门学科的新认知,因为它借鉴了瑞士民俗学研究的早期跨国接触,以克服民族学在20世纪60年代发现自己的危机。欧洲化和面向当下是稳定学术学科的策略,也是在公共领域建立学科的策略。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Europeanization as Strategy : disciplinary shifts in Switzerland and the formation of European Ethnology
eThnologia euroPaea 45:1 European ethnology has never been a coherent, conclusive discipline but has rather been a loose network of interests, topics and collaborations. This had already been the case as numerous institutions such as the Société Internationale d’Ethnologie et de Folklore (SIEF) and the journal Ethnologia Europaea were founded. Within these institutions, a small group of “Europeanists” that formed in the middle of the 1960s played an important role. A key member of this group was the Swiss-born Arnold Niederer (1914–1998). Not only was Niederer one of the founders of Ethnologia Europaea in 1966/67, he was also significantly involved in the formation of the loose network of actors who helped promote, share and establish European ethnology as a new discipline. Early on, Niederer saw himself as a European ethnologist; his comparative cross-cultural interests were present already well before the institutionalization of the corresponding research context. Thus, he is one of the pioneers of the discipline; a comparative perspective on the Alpine region and research on forms of cooperative work organized at the community level kindled his interest in European issues. Niederer was one of the researchers, together with Sigurd Erixon, Jorge Dias and others, who wanted to overcome divisions between the different national and local ethnologies in Europe and thus contributed to the network of European ethnology. In this process, they also reflected theoretically on the common – as well as distinct – characteristics of European ethnology across Europe. This paper examines the epistemological and institutional activities in the field of Volkskunde/ folklore studies in Switzerland leading to the discipline’s reformation as “European ethnology”. Drawing on archival materials, the article takes Arnold Niederer (1914–1998) as a starting point by showing how Niederer, his networks and research contexts were involved in the formation of the loose alliance of interests that were subsequently institutionalized. This paper traces the new perception of the discipline “European ethnology” as it draws on early transnational contacts of Swiss Folklore Studies in order to overcome the crisis in which Volkskunde found itself in the 1960s. Europeanization and an orientation toward the present were strategies to stabilize the academic discipline but also to establish the discipline in the public sphere.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Ethnologia Europaea
Ethnologia Europaea Social Sciences-Cultural Studies
CiteScore
1.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
6
审稿时长
52 weeks
期刊最新文献
Being a Bridge? Intercultural Mediation in Slovenian Healthcare Europe in the woods. Reflections on the situation at the Polish-Belarusian border. Socio-cultural effects of biomedicalisation - an example of LCHAD deficiency in the Kashubian population Food waste reduction and discursive change: reconstituting the cultural norm of not wasting food Governance as civil servant practice(s). A theoretical and analytical contribution.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1