IMPACT实施支持平台的实施结果评估

M. DeRosier, T. Cox, E. Lindley
{"title":"IMPACT实施支持平台的实施结果评估","authors":"M. DeRosier, T. Cox, E. Lindley","doi":"10.15761/jts.1000460","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: The IMPACT implementation support platform is a measurement and feedback system specifically designed to scale evidence-based programs and practices (EBPPs) and support high-quality implementation. The purpose of this study was to evaluate use of the IMPACT software system in terms of its acceptability, appropriateness, feasibility, and likelihood of adoption. Methods : Seventy-eight school-based providers (across 49 schools) participated in this study. Demographic and background information was collected in the fall of 2019. Thereafter, providers delivered the Social Skills Group Intervention (S.S.GRIN) EBPP with students as usual and used IMPACT to enter and track progress and process data for their S.S.GRIN groups. In the spring of 2020, providers completed a series of ratings to evaluate their experience with IMPACT. Providers' usage of IMPACT during the study was also tracked. Results : Providers' ratings of IMPACT for each implementation outcome were significantly higher than average ( p < 0.001), with Satisfaction, Superior Innovation, and Interface Quality being especially positive. There was a significant interaction effect where ratings were higher for providers who reported disliking implementation data tracking for S.S.GRIN at the start of the study. Greater usage was significantly associated with higher ratings of providers’ capacity for tracking implementation data and a higher likelihood of recommending IMPACT to others. No significant differences in the patterns of results were found for demographic subgroups. Conclusion : IMPACT was seen as acceptable, feasible, and appropriate by school-based S.S.GRIN providers who reported likely continued use (adoption) of the innovation. IMPACT was particularly well received by those who started the study with negative impressions of implementation data tracking for S.S.GRIN. This study supports the potential utility and value for supporting ongoing implementation of school-based programs. Future research is needed to evaluate IMPACT for other EBPPs and in other service delivery settings to determine the generalizability of this study’s findings.","PeriodicalId":74000,"journal":{"name":"Journal of translational science","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Evaluation of implementation outcomes for the IMPACT implementation support platform\",\"authors\":\"M. DeRosier, T. Cox, E. Lindley\",\"doi\":\"10.15761/jts.1000460\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Background: The IMPACT implementation support platform is a measurement and feedback system specifically designed to scale evidence-based programs and practices (EBPPs) and support high-quality implementation. The purpose of this study was to evaluate use of the IMPACT software system in terms of its acceptability, appropriateness, feasibility, and likelihood of adoption. Methods : Seventy-eight school-based providers (across 49 schools) participated in this study. Demographic and background information was collected in the fall of 2019. Thereafter, providers delivered the Social Skills Group Intervention (S.S.GRIN) EBPP with students as usual and used IMPACT to enter and track progress and process data for their S.S.GRIN groups. In the spring of 2020, providers completed a series of ratings to evaluate their experience with IMPACT. Providers' usage of IMPACT during the study was also tracked. Results : Providers' ratings of IMPACT for each implementation outcome were significantly higher than average ( p < 0.001), with Satisfaction, Superior Innovation, and Interface Quality being especially positive. There was a significant interaction effect where ratings were higher for providers who reported disliking implementation data tracking for S.S.GRIN at the start of the study. Greater usage was significantly associated with higher ratings of providers’ capacity for tracking implementation data and a higher likelihood of recommending IMPACT to others. No significant differences in the patterns of results were found for demographic subgroups. Conclusion : IMPACT was seen as acceptable, feasible, and appropriate by school-based S.S.GRIN providers who reported likely continued use (adoption) of the innovation. IMPACT was particularly well received by those who started the study with negative impressions of implementation data tracking for S.S.GRIN. This study supports the potential utility and value for supporting ongoing implementation of school-based programs. Future research is needed to evaluate IMPACT for other EBPPs and in other service delivery settings to determine the generalizability of this study’s findings.\",\"PeriodicalId\":74000,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of translational science\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of translational science\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.15761/jts.1000460\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of translational science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15761/jts.1000460","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:IMPACT实施支持平台是一个测量和反馈系统,专门用于扩展循证计划和实践(ebpp)并支持高质量的实施。本研究的目的是评估IMPACT软件系统的可接受性、适当性、可行性和采用的可能性。方法:78个校本提供者(横跨49所学校)参与了本研究。人口统计和背景信息是在2019年秋季收集的。之后,提供者像往常一样为学生提供了社会技能小组干预(S.S.GRIN) EBPP,并使用IMPACT来输入和跟踪他们的S.S.GRIN小组的进展和过程数据。在2020年春季,供应商完成了一系列评级,以评估他们在IMPACT方面的经验。在研究期间,供应商对IMPACT的使用情况也进行了跟踪。结果:供应商对每个实施结果的影响评分显著高于平均水平(p < 0.001),满意度、卓越创新和界面质量尤其积极。在研究开始时,报告不喜欢S.S.GRIN实施数据跟踪的提供者的评分较高,这是一个显著的交互效应。更大的使用率与提供商跟踪实施数据的能力的更高评级显著相关,并且更有可能向其他人推荐IMPACT。在人口统计亚组的结果模式上没有发现显著差异。结论:学校的S.S.GRIN提供者认为IMPACT是可接受的、可行的和适当的,他们报告可能继续使用(采用)这项创新。IMPACT特别受到那些开始研究时对s.s.g grin执行数据跟踪印象不佳的人的欢迎。这项研究支持了支持正在进行的校本项目的潜在效用和价值。未来的研究需要评估其他ebpp和其他服务交付环境的影响,以确定本研究结果的普遍性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Evaluation of implementation outcomes for the IMPACT implementation support platform
Background: The IMPACT implementation support platform is a measurement and feedback system specifically designed to scale evidence-based programs and practices (EBPPs) and support high-quality implementation. The purpose of this study was to evaluate use of the IMPACT software system in terms of its acceptability, appropriateness, feasibility, and likelihood of adoption. Methods : Seventy-eight school-based providers (across 49 schools) participated in this study. Demographic and background information was collected in the fall of 2019. Thereafter, providers delivered the Social Skills Group Intervention (S.S.GRIN) EBPP with students as usual and used IMPACT to enter and track progress and process data for their S.S.GRIN groups. In the spring of 2020, providers completed a series of ratings to evaluate their experience with IMPACT. Providers' usage of IMPACT during the study was also tracked. Results : Providers' ratings of IMPACT for each implementation outcome were significantly higher than average ( p < 0.001), with Satisfaction, Superior Innovation, and Interface Quality being especially positive. There was a significant interaction effect where ratings were higher for providers who reported disliking implementation data tracking for S.S.GRIN at the start of the study. Greater usage was significantly associated with higher ratings of providers’ capacity for tracking implementation data and a higher likelihood of recommending IMPACT to others. No significant differences in the patterns of results were found for demographic subgroups. Conclusion : IMPACT was seen as acceptable, feasible, and appropriate by school-based S.S.GRIN providers who reported likely continued use (adoption) of the innovation. IMPACT was particularly well received by those who started the study with negative impressions of implementation data tracking for S.S.GRIN. This study supports the potential utility and value for supporting ongoing implementation of school-based programs. Future research is needed to evaluate IMPACT for other EBPPs and in other service delivery settings to determine the generalizability of this study’s findings.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Bell’s palsy and lip HSV-1 infection: importance of subcutaneous access Clinical research reactivation during the COVID-19 pandemic: An academic center process and lessons for the future. Bell's palsy and lip HSV-1 infection: importance of subcutaneous access. Attitudes towards clinical trial participation among people living with chronic hepatitis B How smell regulates metabolism: The role of ectopically expressed olfactory receptors in lipid and glucose homeostasis
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1