世界首个使用iPS细胞片治疗角膜上皮干细胞缺乏症的临床试验

A. Akabayashi, E. Nakazawa, Nancy S. Jecker
{"title":"世界首个使用iPS细胞片治疗角膜上皮干细胞缺乏症的临床试验","authors":"A. Akabayashi, E. Nakazawa, Nancy S. Jecker","doi":"10.15761/nfo.1000234","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: The world’s first clinical trial using induced pluripotent stem cell sheets for corneal epithelial stem cell deficiency is underway. Elsewhere, we have analysed the protocol and argued it basically ethical. Main points for debates: We raise three ethical points. First, the new therapy should demonstrate greater therapeutic effects when compared with other treatment methods. Second, cost is a potential barrier to widespread adoption. Third, the shortage of eye donors in Japan raises ethical concerns of fairness, as Japan relies on donors in other countries Conclusion: While there are many issues to be debated and addressed for this new eye therapy, we believe the ophthalmology field will assume moral leadership in the pursuit of iPSC clinical research. Background On December 26, 2018, the review committee of Osaka University, Japan, granted conditional approval for a clinical trial to transplant corneal cell sheets from induced pluripotent stem cells (iPSC) in patients with corneal epithelial stem cell deficiency [1]. We previously objected to the protocol in a separate iPSC transplantation study for heart failure patients as ethically impermissible [2]. However, the protocol in the latest corneal trials appears to meet ethical standards very well. It appears to be fully reliable in its handling of adverse events (rejection or tumorigenicity), as transplanted corneal sheets can be easily removed. Since the new study is already underway, an ethical discussion is even more critical. Main points for debates Below, we raise three points for debate for this up and coming therapy. First, the potential benefits of the study seem to warrant the risk to which research subjects are exposed. The question of whether iPSC sheet grafts can truly surpass allogeneic donated eye transplants or amniotic membranes in quality and therapeutic effects warrants rigorous scientific assessment. The subjects in this transplant study are patients with corneal epithelial stem cell deficiency. Some ophthalmology specialists note that in other cornea diseases, endothelial dysfunction is particularly salient. iPSC sheets replace mainly the epithelium. On the other hand, amniotic membrane demonstrates a record of effectiveness within certain parameters. Demonstrating greater therapeutic effects will be key to adding another future option to cornea transplant methods. *Correspondence to: Akira Akabayashi, Department of Biomedical Ethics, School of Public Health, University of Tokyo Graduate School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan, E-Mail: akirasan-tky@umin.ac.jp","PeriodicalId":91933,"journal":{"name":"New frontiers in ophthalmology (London)","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The world’s first clinical trial using iPS cell sheets for corneal epithelial stem cell deficiency\",\"authors\":\"A. Akabayashi, E. Nakazawa, Nancy S. Jecker\",\"doi\":\"10.15761/nfo.1000234\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Background: The world’s first clinical trial using induced pluripotent stem cell sheets for corneal epithelial stem cell deficiency is underway. Elsewhere, we have analysed the protocol and argued it basically ethical. Main points for debates: We raise three ethical points. First, the new therapy should demonstrate greater therapeutic effects when compared with other treatment methods. Second, cost is a potential barrier to widespread adoption. Third, the shortage of eye donors in Japan raises ethical concerns of fairness, as Japan relies on donors in other countries Conclusion: While there are many issues to be debated and addressed for this new eye therapy, we believe the ophthalmology field will assume moral leadership in the pursuit of iPSC clinical research. Background On December 26, 2018, the review committee of Osaka University, Japan, granted conditional approval for a clinical trial to transplant corneal cell sheets from induced pluripotent stem cells (iPSC) in patients with corneal epithelial stem cell deficiency [1]. We previously objected to the protocol in a separate iPSC transplantation study for heart failure patients as ethically impermissible [2]. However, the protocol in the latest corneal trials appears to meet ethical standards very well. It appears to be fully reliable in its handling of adverse events (rejection or tumorigenicity), as transplanted corneal sheets can be easily removed. Since the new study is already underway, an ethical discussion is even more critical. Main points for debates Below, we raise three points for debate for this up and coming therapy. First, the potential benefits of the study seem to warrant the risk to which research subjects are exposed. The question of whether iPSC sheet grafts can truly surpass allogeneic donated eye transplants or amniotic membranes in quality and therapeutic effects warrants rigorous scientific assessment. The subjects in this transplant study are patients with corneal epithelial stem cell deficiency. Some ophthalmology specialists note that in other cornea diseases, endothelial dysfunction is particularly salient. iPSC sheets replace mainly the epithelium. On the other hand, amniotic membrane demonstrates a record of effectiveness within certain parameters. Demonstrating greater therapeutic effects will be key to adding another future option to cornea transplant methods. *Correspondence to: Akira Akabayashi, Department of Biomedical Ethics, School of Public Health, University of Tokyo Graduate School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan, E-Mail: akirasan-tky@umin.ac.jp\",\"PeriodicalId\":91933,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"New frontiers in ophthalmology (London)\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"3\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"New frontiers in ophthalmology (London)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.15761/nfo.1000234\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"New frontiers in ophthalmology (London)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15761/nfo.1000234","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

摘要

背景:世界上第一个使用诱导多能干细胞片治疗角膜上皮干细胞缺乏症的临床试验正在进行中。在其他地方,我们分析了该协议,并认为它基本上是道德的。辩论要点:我们提出三个伦理问题。首先,与其他治疗方法相比,新疗法应该表现出更大的治疗效果。其次,成本是广泛采用的潜在障碍。第三,由于日本依赖其他国家的捐赠者,日本的眼捐赠者短缺引发了对公平的伦理担忧。结论:尽管这种新的眼科疗法还有许多问题需要讨论和解决,但我们相信眼科领域将在追求iPSC临床研究方面承担道德领导作用。2018年12月26日,日本大阪大学审查委员会有条件批准了一项移植诱导多能干细胞(iPSC)角膜细胞片用于角膜上皮干细胞缺乏症[1]患者的临床试验。我们之前曾在一项独立的心力衰竭患者iPSC移植研究中反对该方案,因为在伦理上是不允许的。然而,最新的角膜试验方案似乎非常符合伦理标准。它在处理不良事件(排斥反应或致瘤性)方面似乎是完全可靠的,因为移植的角膜片可以很容易地移除。由于这项新研究已经在进行中,伦理讨论就更加关键了。下面,我们就这个即将到来的疗法提出三点争论。首先,这项研究的潜在好处似乎证明了研究对象所面临的风险。iPSC片移植能否在质量和治疗效果上真正超越同种异体供体眼移植或羊膜,这一问题需要进行严格的科学评估。本移植研究的对象是角膜上皮干细胞缺乏症患者。一些眼科专家指出,在其他角膜疾病中,内皮功能障碍尤为突出。iPSC片主要替代上皮细胞。另一方面,羊膜在一定的参数范围内显示出有效的记录。证明更大的治疗效果将是未来增加另一种角膜移植方法的关键。*通信对象:日本东京东京大学医学研究生院公共卫生学院生物医学伦理系赤林明,E-Mail: akirasan-tky@umin.ac.jp
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
The world’s first clinical trial using iPS cell sheets for corneal epithelial stem cell deficiency
Background: The world’s first clinical trial using induced pluripotent stem cell sheets for corneal epithelial stem cell deficiency is underway. Elsewhere, we have analysed the protocol and argued it basically ethical. Main points for debates: We raise three ethical points. First, the new therapy should demonstrate greater therapeutic effects when compared with other treatment methods. Second, cost is a potential barrier to widespread adoption. Third, the shortage of eye donors in Japan raises ethical concerns of fairness, as Japan relies on donors in other countries Conclusion: While there are many issues to be debated and addressed for this new eye therapy, we believe the ophthalmology field will assume moral leadership in the pursuit of iPSC clinical research. Background On December 26, 2018, the review committee of Osaka University, Japan, granted conditional approval for a clinical trial to transplant corneal cell sheets from induced pluripotent stem cells (iPSC) in patients with corneal epithelial stem cell deficiency [1]. We previously objected to the protocol in a separate iPSC transplantation study for heart failure patients as ethically impermissible [2]. However, the protocol in the latest corneal trials appears to meet ethical standards very well. It appears to be fully reliable in its handling of adverse events (rejection or tumorigenicity), as transplanted corneal sheets can be easily removed. Since the new study is already underway, an ethical discussion is even more critical. Main points for debates Below, we raise three points for debate for this up and coming therapy. First, the potential benefits of the study seem to warrant the risk to which research subjects are exposed. The question of whether iPSC sheet grafts can truly surpass allogeneic donated eye transplants or amniotic membranes in quality and therapeutic effects warrants rigorous scientific assessment. The subjects in this transplant study are patients with corneal epithelial stem cell deficiency. Some ophthalmology specialists note that in other cornea diseases, endothelial dysfunction is particularly salient. iPSC sheets replace mainly the epithelium. On the other hand, amniotic membrane demonstrates a record of effectiveness within certain parameters. Demonstrating greater therapeutic effects will be key to adding another future option to cornea transplant methods. *Correspondence to: Akira Akabayashi, Department of Biomedical Ethics, School of Public Health, University of Tokyo Graduate School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan, E-Mail: akirasan-tky@umin.ac.jp
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Interactive test to categorize metamorphopsia Intra- and early postoperative complications after standard cataract surgery or femtosecond laser-assisted cataract surgery combined with pars plana vitrectomy in cases of retinal diseases Regulation of time-dependent lens opacification by hydrogen sulfide-releasing compounds Ocular immunity and peculiarities around COVID-19: Can universal protective eye wear be a game changer? Head to head comparison of the clinical and cost effectiveness of Observe and Plan versus PRN for the treatment of wet macular degeneration
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1