哈利卡那索斯的狄俄尼索斯的罗马古物序言:史学古典主义第一步的注释

IF 0.1 0 LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS Philologica Canariensia Pub Date : 2014-01-01 DOI:10.20420/PHILCAN.2014.0022

Miguel Ángel Rodríguez Horrillo

{"title":"哈利卡那索斯的狄俄尼索斯的罗马古物序言:史学古典主义第一步的注释","authors":"Miguel Ángel Rodríguez Horrillo","doi":"10.20420/PHILCAN.2014.0022","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This article examines the structural criteria of the proem of Dionysius’ Roman antiquities, with special attention to their relation with the author’s ideas about the general proem of Thucydides. It also pays attention to the phrase, in order to define the stylistic rules of the proem and its place in the literary polemic of Dionysius’ time.","PeriodicalId":53723,"journal":{"name":"Philologica Canariensia","volume":"20 1","pages":"115-133"},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2014-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"EL PROEMIO A LAS ANTIGÜEDADES ROMANAS DE DIONISIO DE HALICARNASO: APUNTES PARA LOS PRIMEROS PASOS DEL CLASICISMO HISTORIOGRÁFICO\",\"authors\":\"Miguel Ángel Rodríguez Horrillo\",\"doi\":\"10.20420/PHILCAN.2014.0022\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This article examines the structural criteria of the proem of Dionysius’ Roman antiquities, with special attention to their relation with the author’s ideas about the general proem of Thucydides. It also pays attention to the phrase, in order to define the stylistic rules of the proem and its place in the literary polemic of Dionysius’ time.\",\"PeriodicalId\":53723,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Philologica Canariensia\",\"volume\":\"20 1\",\"pages\":\"115-133\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2014-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Philologica Canariensia\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.20420/PHILCAN.2014.0022\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Philologica Canariensia","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.20420/PHILCAN.2014.0022","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

摘要

本文考察了狄奥尼修斯《罗马古物》论证的结构标准，特别注意它们与作者关于修昔底德一般论证的思想的关系。它也注意到短语，以定义的文体规则的问题和它在迪奥尼修斯时代的文学论战中的地位。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

查看原文

微信好友朋友圈 QQ好友复制链接

本刊更多论文

EL PROEMIO A LAS ANTIGÜEDADES ROMANAS DE DIONISIO DE HALICARNASO: APUNTES PARA LOS PRIMEROS PASOS DEL CLASICISMO HISTORIOGRÁFICO

This article examines the structural criteria of the proem of Dionysius’ Roman antiquities, with special attention to their relation with the author’s ideas about the general proem of Thucydides. It also pays attention to the phrase, in order to define the stylistic rules of the proem and its place in the literary polemic of Dionysius’ time.

求助全文

通过发布文献求助，成功后即可免费获取论文全文。去求助

来源期刊