{"title":"“喜剧演员立即杀人”:莱奥波多·阿拉斯及其对卡尔德隆道德的批判性反应","authors":"M. Saba","doi":"10.20420/PHILCAN.2016.104","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"En el contexto de finales de siglo XIX, varios escritores liberales denunciaron por medio de la literatura y de la critica el caracter arcaico de la moral calderoniana con respecto a la venganza por deshonor. Casos afines en las obras de Leopoldo Alas y de Benito Perez Galdos permiten analizar los modos en que la intelectualidad de la epoca rechazo la logica de la revancha y propuso nuevos modelos de reaccion ante la eventual trasgresion del adulterio. Sin embargo, el ejemplo especifico del ataque que la critica clariniana hace de Calderon durante los homenajes de 1881 deja al descubierto ciertas contradicciones del campo liberal con respecto a la herencia cultural del canon aureo. PALABRAS CLAVE: Galdos, Clarin, honor, Calderon, critica “Actors are quick to kill”: Leopoldo Alas and his critical reaction against Calderon’s morals In the context of the late nineteenth century, several liberal writers denounced, both through literature and in their critical writings, the archaic character of Calderon’s morals regarding revenge for dishonor. Similar examples in the works of Leopoldo Alas and Benito Perez Galdos allow us to analyze the ways in which the intelligentsia of their time rejected the logic of revenge and proposed new models of reaction to the possible transgression of adultery. However, Clarin’s critical articles against Calderon in 1881, the 200th anniversary of his death, reveal certain contradictions in the liberal side about the cultural heritage of the Golden Age canon. KEYWORDS: Galdos, Clarin, honor, Calderon, criticism DOI: 10.20420/PhilCan.2016.104","PeriodicalId":53723,"journal":{"name":"Philologica Canariensia","volume":"22 1","pages":"89-103"},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2016-10-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"“Los cómicos matan en seguida”: Leopoldo Alas y su reacción crítica frente a la moral calderoniana\",\"authors\":\"M. Saba\",\"doi\":\"10.20420/PHILCAN.2016.104\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"En el contexto de finales de siglo XIX, varios escritores liberales denunciaron por medio de la literatura y de la critica el caracter arcaico de la moral calderoniana con respecto a la venganza por deshonor. Casos afines en las obras de Leopoldo Alas y de Benito Perez Galdos permiten analizar los modos en que la intelectualidad de la epoca rechazo la logica de la revancha y propuso nuevos modelos de reaccion ante la eventual trasgresion del adulterio. Sin embargo, el ejemplo especifico del ataque que la critica clariniana hace de Calderon durante los homenajes de 1881 deja al descubierto ciertas contradicciones del campo liberal con respecto a la herencia cultural del canon aureo. PALABRAS CLAVE: Galdos, Clarin, honor, Calderon, critica “Actors are quick to kill”: Leopoldo Alas and his critical reaction against Calderon’s morals In the context of the late nineteenth century, several liberal writers denounced, both through literature and in their critical writings, the archaic character of Calderon’s morals regarding revenge for dishonor. Similar examples in the works of Leopoldo Alas and Benito Perez Galdos allow us to analyze the ways in which the intelligentsia of their time rejected the logic of revenge and proposed new models of reaction to the possible transgression of adultery. However, Clarin’s critical articles against Calderon in 1881, the 200th anniversary of his death, reveal certain contradictions in the liberal side about the cultural heritage of the Golden Age canon. KEYWORDS: Galdos, Clarin, honor, Calderon, criticism DOI: 10.20420/PhilCan.2016.104\",\"PeriodicalId\":53723,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Philologica Canariensia\",\"volume\":\"22 1\",\"pages\":\"89-103\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2016-10-25\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Philologica Canariensia\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.20420/PHILCAN.2016.104\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Philologica Canariensia","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.20420/PHILCAN.2016.104","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
在19世纪晚期的背景下,一些自由主义作家通过文学和批评的方式谴责了卡尔德隆关于耻辱复仇的古老道德特征。在这篇文章中,我们分析了当时的知识分子拒绝复仇逻辑的方式,并提出了对通奸可能违反的新的反应模式。然而,在1881年的颂词中,克拉里安批评家对卡尔德隆的攻击的具体例子揭示了自由主义领域在欧里奥经典的文化遗产方面的某些矛盾。关键词:Galdos Clarin、荣誉、quick to Calderon,批评“非国家行为体”:清洁圣器翅膀以及他critical反应against Calderon引言In the context of the nineteenth century,跳动若干自由作家谴责,通过文献and In their critical the end of both the archaic查阅of Calderon’s revenge for dishonor引言。类似《in the works of清洁圣器翅膀和贝尼托·佩雷斯Galdos allow us to analyze the途径in which the知识界of their time rejected the logic of revenge和拟议的新models of反应to the可能transgression of adultery。然而,克拉林在1881年《卡尔德隆去世200周年》中对卡尔德隆的批评文章揭示了关于黄金时代正典文化遗产的自由主义方面的某些矛盾。关键词:Galdos, Clarin,荣誉,Calderon,批评DOI: 10.20420/PhilCan.2016.104
“Los cómicos matan en seguida”: Leopoldo Alas y su reacción crítica frente a la moral calderoniana
En el contexto de finales de siglo XIX, varios escritores liberales denunciaron por medio de la literatura y de la critica el caracter arcaico de la moral calderoniana con respecto a la venganza por deshonor. Casos afines en las obras de Leopoldo Alas y de Benito Perez Galdos permiten analizar los modos en que la intelectualidad de la epoca rechazo la logica de la revancha y propuso nuevos modelos de reaccion ante la eventual trasgresion del adulterio. Sin embargo, el ejemplo especifico del ataque que la critica clariniana hace de Calderon durante los homenajes de 1881 deja al descubierto ciertas contradicciones del campo liberal con respecto a la herencia cultural del canon aureo. PALABRAS CLAVE: Galdos, Clarin, honor, Calderon, critica “Actors are quick to kill”: Leopoldo Alas and his critical reaction against Calderon’s morals In the context of the late nineteenth century, several liberal writers denounced, both through literature and in their critical writings, the archaic character of Calderon’s morals regarding revenge for dishonor. Similar examples in the works of Leopoldo Alas and Benito Perez Galdos allow us to analyze the ways in which the intelligentsia of their time rejected the logic of revenge and proposed new models of reaction to the possible transgression of adultery. However, Clarin’s critical articles against Calderon in 1881, the 200th anniversary of his death, reveal certain contradictions in the liberal side about the cultural heritage of the Golden Age canon. KEYWORDS: Galdos, Clarin, honor, Calderon, criticism DOI: 10.20420/PhilCan.2016.104