在《里斯本条约》第50条下,欧洲议会扮演什么角色

IF 0.8 4区 社会学 Q2 LAW European Law Review Pub Date : 2017-01-01 DOI:10.17863/CAM.7118
D. Harvey
{"title":"在《里斯本条约》第50条下,欧洲议会扮演什么角色","authors":"D. Harvey","doi":"10.17863/CAM.7118","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Following the UK's vote to leave the EU in a national referendum there has been much debate over the correct legal process to be followed under both domestic law and the EU Treaties to give effect to this decision. This article seeks to contribute to these discussions by focusing on an aspect of the withdrawal process which, in the author�s view, has not been given full consideration to date; namely, the need for the consent of the European Parliament before any withdrawal agreement may be completed.","PeriodicalId":45752,"journal":{"name":"European Law Review","volume":"1 1","pages":"585-602"},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2017-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"What Role for the European Parliament Under Article 50 TEU\",\"authors\":\"D. Harvey\",\"doi\":\"10.17863/CAM.7118\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Following the UK's vote to leave the EU in a national referendum there has been much debate over the correct legal process to be followed under both domestic law and the EU Treaties to give effect to this decision. This article seeks to contribute to these discussions by focusing on an aspect of the withdrawal process which, in the author�s view, has not been given full consideration to date; namely, the need for the consent of the European Parliament before any withdrawal agreement may be completed.\",\"PeriodicalId\":45752,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"European Law Review\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"585-602\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2017-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"European Law Review\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"90\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.17863/CAM.7118\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"社会学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"LAW\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Law Review","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.17863/CAM.7118","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"LAW","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

英国在全民公投中决定退出欧盟后,关于国内法和欧盟条约应遵循的正确法律程序以使这一决定生效的问题引发了很多争论。本文力求对这些讨论作出贡献,把重点放在撤回程序的一个方面,而作者认为,这个方面迄今尚未得到充分考虑;也就是说,在完成任何退出协议之前,都需要得到欧洲议会的同意。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
What Role for the European Parliament Under Article 50 TEU
Following the UK's vote to leave the EU in a national referendum there has been much debate over the correct legal process to be followed under both domestic law and the EU Treaties to give effect to this decision. This article seeks to contribute to these discussions by focusing on an aspect of the withdrawal process which, in the author�s view, has not been given full consideration to date; namely, the need for the consent of the European Parliament before any withdrawal agreement may be completed.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.10
自引率
10.00%
发文量
1
期刊最新文献
Playing by its own rules? A quantitative empirical analysis of justificatory reasoning in the registered trade mark case law of the European Court of Justice - dataset Beyond Food Safety: EU Food Information Standards as a Facilitator of Political Consumerism and International Law Enforcement Mechanism When Does a Communication to the Public Under EU Copyright Law Need to Be to a ‘New Public’? Regulatory Autonomy after EU Membership - Alignment, Divergence and the Discipline of Law Regulatory Autonomy after EU Membership: Alignment, Divergence and the Discipline of Law
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1