探讨身体活动与心理困扰的中介模型

IF 0.8 Q4 SPORT SCIENCES Physical Activity Review Pub Date : 2022-01-01 DOI:10.16926/par.2022.10.06
Tavis Watt, E. Kehoe
{"title":"探讨身体活动与心理困扰的中介模型","authors":"Tavis Watt, E. Kehoe","doi":"10.16926/par.2022.10.06","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Leisure-time physical activity has well demonstrated benefits in mitigating symptoms of depression and, to a lesser extent, anxiety. A variety of theoretical mechanisms have been proposed as mediators of this linkage. There has been no reported attempt to develop a unified model of the relative contributions of the proposed mechanisms. To begin to fill this gap, 394 first-year university students were surveyed concerning their participation in physical activity (broadly defined), their level of depressive and anxiety symptoms as indexed by the Kessler 10, and four mediators identified as promising candidates in the literature: behavioral activation (sense of purpose and achievement), belonging (sense of social contact and inclusion), sense of flow (concentrated engagement in activity), and coaching relationship (formal or informal assistance from another person). Each of the candidate mechanisms individually mediated the relationship between physical activity and the K10 score. However, the scores for each of the mechanisms themselves were inter-correlated to a small or medium degree. When all scores were analysed as an integrated model, only behavioral activation and belonging were significant mediators. Once these two mediators had been accounted for, there was no additional direct effect of physical activity on both depression and anxiety. The next steps for refining and testing the model are discussed.","PeriodicalId":43466,"journal":{"name":"Physical Activity Review","volume":"9 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Toward a Mediated Model of Physical Activity in Relation to Psychological Distress\",\"authors\":\"Tavis Watt, E. Kehoe\",\"doi\":\"10.16926/par.2022.10.06\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Leisure-time physical activity has well demonstrated benefits in mitigating symptoms of depression and, to a lesser extent, anxiety. A variety of theoretical mechanisms have been proposed as mediators of this linkage. There has been no reported attempt to develop a unified model of the relative contributions of the proposed mechanisms. To begin to fill this gap, 394 first-year university students were surveyed concerning their participation in physical activity (broadly defined), their level of depressive and anxiety symptoms as indexed by the Kessler 10, and four mediators identified as promising candidates in the literature: behavioral activation (sense of purpose and achievement), belonging (sense of social contact and inclusion), sense of flow (concentrated engagement in activity), and coaching relationship (formal or informal assistance from another person). Each of the candidate mechanisms individually mediated the relationship between physical activity and the K10 score. However, the scores for each of the mechanisms themselves were inter-correlated to a small or medium degree. When all scores were analysed as an integrated model, only behavioral activation and belonging were significant mediators. Once these two mediators had been accounted for, there was no additional direct effect of physical activity on both depression and anxiety. The next steps for refining and testing the model are discussed.\",\"PeriodicalId\":43466,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Physical Activity Review\",\"volume\":\"9 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Physical Activity Review\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.16926/par.2022.10.06\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"SPORT SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Physical Activity Review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.16926/par.2022.10.06","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"SPORT SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

休闲时间的体育活动已被充分证明对减轻抑郁症状有好处,在较小程度上也能减轻焦虑。已经提出了多种理论机制作为这种联系的中介。目前还没有报道试图为所提议的机制的相对贡献制定一个统一的模型。为了填补这一空白,我们对394名一年级大学生进行了调查,内容涉及他们参与体育活动(广义定义)、他们的抑郁和焦虑症状水平(以凯斯勒10指数为索引),以及在文献中被确定为有希望的候选人的四种中介:行为激活(目的感和成就感)、归属感(社会接触感和包容感)、心流感(集中参与活动)和教练关系(他人的正式或非正式帮助)。每种候选机制都单独介导了体育活动与K10评分之间的关系。然而,每一种机制本身的得分都有一个小或中等程度的相互关联。当所有分数作为一个综合模型进行分析时,只有行为激活和归属是显著的中介。一旦这两种媒介被考虑在内,体育活动对抑郁和焦虑就没有额外的直接影响。讨论了改进和测试模型的后续步骤。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Toward a Mediated Model of Physical Activity in Relation to Psychological Distress
Leisure-time physical activity has well demonstrated benefits in mitigating symptoms of depression and, to a lesser extent, anxiety. A variety of theoretical mechanisms have been proposed as mediators of this linkage. There has been no reported attempt to develop a unified model of the relative contributions of the proposed mechanisms. To begin to fill this gap, 394 first-year university students were surveyed concerning their participation in physical activity (broadly defined), their level of depressive and anxiety symptoms as indexed by the Kessler 10, and four mediators identified as promising candidates in the literature: behavioral activation (sense of purpose and achievement), belonging (sense of social contact and inclusion), sense of flow (concentrated engagement in activity), and coaching relationship (formal or informal assistance from another person). Each of the candidate mechanisms individually mediated the relationship between physical activity and the K10 score. However, the scores for each of the mechanisms themselves were inter-correlated to a small or medium degree. When all scores were analysed as an integrated model, only behavioral activation and belonging were significant mediators. Once these two mediators had been accounted for, there was no additional direct effect of physical activity on both depression and anxiety. The next steps for refining and testing the model are discussed.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Physical Activity Review
Physical Activity Review SPORT SCIENCES-
CiteScore
2.40
自引率
11.10%
发文量
23
审稿时长
10 weeks
期刊介绍: Physical Activity Review aims to facilitate and enhance communication across all sub-disciplines of the sport sciences. The emphasis of the journal is on the human sciences, broadly defined, applied to sport and exercise. Subject areas suitable for publication include, but are not limited to the following fields: Sport Science Sport Pedagogy Physiology Biomechanics Sports theory and history Different aspects of martial arts Recreation and tourism Physiotherapy.
期刊最新文献
The variability of strength production capacities during a judo contest Conception of effective mass and effect of force – measurement of taekwon-do master Model of the mediating effect of team pride in the relationship between transformational leadership and sports activity loyalty The influence of core stability exercises programme on the functional limitations of the musculoskeletal system in girls practising volleyball A comparative evaluation of anthropometric characteristics and respiratory functions' parameters among rugby and soccer players
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1