公平工作量与大学学术人员的观念

Venkata Sai Srinivasa Rao Muramalla, K. Alotaibi
{"title":"公平工作量与大学学术人员的观念","authors":"Venkata Sai Srinivasa Rao Muramalla, K. Alotaibi","doi":"10.18848/2329-1656/cgp/v26i02/1-19","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":": Workload is the overall assignments to be completed by individuals in a given time. In academia, the number of instructional hours, credit hours, contact hours, class sizes, non-instructional schedules, student-teacher ratio, scholarly activities, and administrative and community services will determine the workload of faculty members in a semester. Any discrimination, favoritism, partiality, or managerial biases in the distribution of the workloads would lead to misconceptions among the academic staff that will affect the work culture of educational institutions. In this context, this paper examines the perceptions of 256 academic staff chosen by stratified random sampling from ten universities in Saudi Arabia by using a questionnaire on the general practices of universities for the allocation of the equitable workload in three variables such as teaching, research, and academic administration. Study results revealed that the academic staff positively responded to all the practices in the three variables. This paper answered the questions of what are the significant differences and significant correlations in the perceptions of academic staff concerning equitable workload distribution in the three variables. Firstly, it was found that the academic staff as groups by gender, nationality, type of university, and tenure has a significant perceptional difference in the three variables. In Saudi Arabia, foreigners work on contract basis, therefore, this study revealed that foreign staff members place more emphasis on teaching instead of research and administration. This result was found in college faculty members in science, arts, and other college faculty members. The study further found a relationship among three types of faculty departments/disciplines as far as teaching and administrative work is concerned, but there is no relation between research and administrative work. In conclusion, the authors have recommended, some practical suggestions for equitable workload among academic staff.","PeriodicalId":53503,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Educational Organization and Leadership","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Equitable Workload and the Perceptions of Academic Staff in Universities\",\"authors\":\"Venkata Sai Srinivasa Rao Muramalla, K. Alotaibi\",\"doi\":\"10.18848/2329-1656/cgp/v26i02/1-19\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\": Workload is the overall assignments to be completed by individuals in a given time. In academia, the number of instructional hours, credit hours, contact hours, class sizes, non-instructional schedules, student-teacher ratio, scholarly activities, and administrative and community services will determine the workload of faculty members in a semester. Any discrimination, favoritism, partiality, or managerial biases in the distribution of the workloads would lead to misconceptions among the academic staff that will affect the work culture of educational institutions. In this context, this paper examines the perceptions of 256 academic staff chosen by stratified random sampling from ten universities in Saudi Arabia by using a questionnaire on the general practices of universities for the allocation of the equitable workload in three variables such as teaching, research, and academic administration. Study results revealed that the academic staff positively responded to all the practices in the three variables. This paper answered the questions of what are the significant differences and significant correlations in the perceptions of academic staff concerning equitable workload distribution in the three variables. Firstly, it was found that the academic staff as groups by gender, nationality, type of university, and tenure has a significant perceptional difference in the three variables. In Saudi Arabia, foreigners work on contract basis, therefore, this study revealed that foreign staff members place more emphasis on teaching instead of research and administration. This result was found in college faculty members in science, arts, and other college faculty members. The study further found a relationship among three types of faculty departments/disciplines as far as teaching and administrative work is concerned, but there is no relation between research and administrative work. In conclusion, the authors have recommended, some practical suggestions for equitable workload among academic staff.\",\"PeriodicalId\":53503,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Educational Organization and Leadership\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Educational Organization and Leadership\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.18848/2329-1656/cgp/v26i02/1-19\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"Social Sciences\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Educational Organization and Leadership","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18848/2329-1656/cgp/v26i02/1-19","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

工作量是指每个人在给定时间内要完成的全部任务。在学术界,教学时数、学分时数、联系时数、班级规模、非教学时间表、师生比例、学术活动、行政和社区服务将决定教员一个学期的工作量。在工作量分配上的任何歧视、偏袒、偏袒或管理偏见都会导致学术人员的误解,从而影响教育机构的工作文化。在此背景下,本文通过使用关于大学在教学、研究和学术管理等三个变量中分配公平工作量的一般做法的问卷调查,从沙特阿拉伯的10所大学中分层随机抽样选出256名学术人员的看法。研究结果显示,在三个变量中,教职员对所有实践都有积极的反应。本文回答了三个变量中学术人员对公平工作量分配的看法的显著差异和显著相关的问题。首先,研究发现,以性别、国籍、大学类型和任期为单位的教职员群体在三个变量上存在显著的感知差异。在沙特阿拉伯,外国人以合同为基础工作,因此,这项研究表明,外国员工更重视教学,而不是研究和管理。这一结果是在大学理科、文科和其他专业的教员中发现的。研究进一步发现,就教学和行政工作而言,三种院系/学科之间存在关系,但研究和行政工作之间没有关系。最后,作者提出了一些切实可行的建议,以促进学术人员工作量的公平分配。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Equitable Workload and the Perceptions of Academic Staff in Universities
: Workload is the overall assignments to be completed by individuals in a given time. In academia, the number of instructional hours, credit hours, contact hours, class sizes, non-instructional schedules, student-teacher ratio, scholarly activities, and administrative and community services will determine the workload of faculty members in a semester. Any discrimination, favoritism, partiality, or managerial biases in the distribution of the workloads would lead to misconceptions among the academic staff that will affect the work culture of educational institutions. In this context, this paper examines the perceptions of 256 academic staff chosen by stratified random sampling from ten universities in Saudi Arabia by using a questionnaire on the general practices of universities for the allocation of the equitable workload in three variables such as teaching, research, and academic administration. Study results revealed that the academic staff positively responded to all the practices in the three variables. This paper answered the questions of what are the significant differences and significant correlations in the perceptions of academic staff concerning equitable workload distribution in the three variables. Firstly, it was found that the academic staff as groups by gender, nationality, type of university, and tenure has a significant perceptional difference in the three variables. In Saudi Arabia, foreigners work on contract basis, therefore, this study revealed that foreign staff members place more emphasis on teaching instead of research and administration. This result was found in college faculty members in science, arts, and other college faculty members. The study further found a relationship among three types of faculty departments/disciplines as far as teaching and administrative work is concerned, but there is no relation between research and administrative work. In conclusion, the authors have recommended, some practical suggestions for equitable workload among academic staff.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
12
期刊介绍: The International Journal of Educational Organization and Leadership inquires into the nature and processes of effective educational administration and leadership.
期刊最新文献
Enhancing University Leadership for Innovative Educational Environments in Saudi Arabia: A Vision 2030 Case Study of Prince Sattam bin Abdulaziz University Stakeholders’ Concept of Quality Assurance in Higher Education Measuring Teaching Effectiveness with Behavioral Scales: A Systematic Literature Review Effects of Knowledge Management, Interpersonal Communication, Sensemaking, and Job Satisfaction on Elementary School Principals’ Job Performance in Indonesia Addressing Ethical Dilemmas: A Case of Community Schools’ Head-Teachers in Nepal
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1