后南斯拉夫国家侨民的定义

IF 0.1 Q4 POLITICAL SCIENCE Politicka Misao-Croatian Political Science Review Pub Date : 2021-02-25 DOI:10.20901/PM.57.4.05
Danijela Vuković-Ćalasan, Siniša Tatalović
{"title":"后南斯拉夫国家侨民的定义","authors":"Danijela Vuković-Ćalasan, Siniša Tatalović","doi":"10.20901/PM.57.4.05","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Contemporary societies exist in the conditions of globalization, which profoundly‎ transforms them in different dimensions. Technological progress enabled‎ the significant changes in the identity dimension. This has, inter alia,‎ resulted in new opportunities for preserving identification with the country of‎ origin, increased interest in the diaspora concept in the politological and sociological‎ thought and caused new approaches and activities by the states in‎ improving relations with their diasporic communities. The former republics‎ of the SFRY, which have been making progress in building legal and institutional‎ capacities for cooperation with diasporas, are no exception. Generally,‎ all of these countries have very numerous and diverse diasporas, which have‎ usually been emerging in a long period of time. This paper analyzes the policies‎ of the states, created by the break-up of the SFRY, towards their diasporas.‎ The policies of these states are specific and they differ from one another,‎ both in defining diaspora and in legal and institutional solutions that should‎ improve diaspora’s link with the country of origin. However, the Republic of‎ Slovenia, the Republic of Croatia, Bosnia and Herzegovina, the Republic of‎ Serbia, Montenegro and the Republic of North Macedonia, have some common‎ elements as well.‎","PeriodicalId":43401,"journal":{"name":"Politicka Misao-Croatian Political Science Review","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2021-02-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Defining Diaspora in post-Yugoslav States\",\"authors\":\"Danijela Vuković-Ćalasan, Siniša Tatalović\",\"doi\":\"10.20901/PM.57.4.05\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Contemporary societies exist in the conditions of globalization, which profoundly‎ transforms them in different dimensions. Technological progress enabled‎ the significant changes in the identity dimension. This has, inter alia,‎ resulted in new opportunities for preserving identification with the country of‎ origin, increased interest in the diaspora concept in the politological and sociological‎ thought and caused new approaches and activities by the states in‎ improving relations with their diasporic communities. The former republics‎ of the SFRY, which have been making progress in building legal and institutional‎ capacities for cooperation with diasporas, are no exception. Generally,‎ all of these countries have very numerous and diverse diasporas, which have‎ usually been emerging in a long period of time. This paper analyzes the policies‎ of the states, created by the break-up of the SFRY, towards their diasporas.‎ The policies of these states are specific and they differ from one another,‎ both in defining diaspora and in legal and institutional solutions that should‎ improve diaspora’s link with the country of origin. However, the Republic of‎ Slovenia, the Republic of Croatia, Bosnia and Herzegovina, the Republic of‎ Serbia, Montenegro and the Republic of North Macedonia, have some common‎ elements as well.‎\",\"PeriodicalId\":43401,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Politicka Misao-Croatian Political Science Review\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-02-25\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Politicka Misao-Croatian Political Science Review\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.20901/PM.57.4.05\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"POLITICAL SCIENCE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Politicka Misao-Croatian Political Science Review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.20901/PM.57.4.05","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"POLITICAL SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

当代社会存在于全球化的条件下,全球化在不同方面深刻地改变了它们。技术进步使身份维度发生了重大变化。除其他外,这为保持对原籍国的认同带来了新的机会,增加了政治和社会学思想中对侨民概念的兴趣,并促使各国采取新的方法和活动来改善与其侨民社区的关系。在建立与侨民合作的法律和体制能力方面取得进展的前南斯拉夫联邦共和国也不例外。总的来说,所有这些国家都有数量众多、种类繁多的侨民,这些侨民通常是在很长一段时间内出现的。本文分析了南斯拉夫联邦共和国解体后各国对散居侨民的政策。这些国家的政策是具体的,它们彼此不同,无论是在定义侨民方面,还是在应该改善侨民与原籍国联系的法律和制度解决方案方面。然而,斯洛文尼亚共和国、克罗地亚共和国、波斯尼亚-黑塞哥维那、塞尔维亚共和国、黑山共和国和北马其顿共和国也有一些共同的因素
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Defining Diaspora in post-Yugoslav States
Contemporary societies exist in the conditions of globalization, which profoundly‎ transforms them in different dimensions. Technological progress enabled‎ the significant changes in the identity dimension. This has, inter alia,‎ resulted in new opportunities for preserving identification with the country of‎ origin, increased interest in the diaspora concept in the politological and sociological‎ thought and caused new approaches and activities by the states in‎ improving relations with their diasporic communities. The former republics‎ of the SFRY, which have been making progress in building legal and institutional‎ capacities for cooperation with diasporas, are no exception. Generally,‎ all of these countries have very numerous and diverse diasporas, which have‎ usually been emerging in a long period of time. This paper analyzes the policies‎ of the states, created by the break-up of the SFRY, towards their diasporas.‎ The policies of these states are specific and they differ from one another,‎ both in defining diaspora and in legal and institutional solutions that should‎ improve diaspora’s link with the country of origin. However, the Republic of‎ Slovenia, the Republic of Croatia, Bosnia and Herzegovina, the Republic of‎ Serbia, Montenegro and the Republic of North Macedonia, have some common‎ elements as well.‎
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.40
自引率
33.30%
发文量
11
审稿时长
3 weeks
期刊介绍: “Politička misao” je akademski časopis za politologiju i srodne discipline, koji od 1964. godine izdaje Fakultet političkih znanosti Sveučilišta u Zagrebu. Časopis je u pola stoljeća izlaženja stekao reputaciju središnjeg akademskog politološkog časopisa u Hrvatskoj i šire, naročito u nekadašnjoj Jugoslaviji, te u regiji koju čine post-jugoslavenske zemlje. “Politička misao” objavljuje priloge iz područja političkih znanosti i političkih studija općenito, odnosno iz svih poddisciplina politologije: političke teorije, međunarodnih odnosa, komparativne politike, hrvatske politike, javne politike, područnih studija, političke komunikacije, obrambenih i sigurnosnih studija i dr. Također, objavljujemo i članke iz područja koje nije moguće jednoznačno klasificirati po njihovoj pripadnosti samo jednoj disciplini nego se nalaze na „granici“ između dviju ili više disciplina: političke povijesti, ekonomske politike, političke filozofije, političke sociologije, političke psihologije, medijskih i kulturalnih studija i sl. Kao izdanje Fakulteta političkih znanosti u Zagrebu, objavljujemo i članke koji su neposredno vezani uz studijske programe na tom fakultetu. “Politička misao” je posebno zainteresirana za radove o hrvatskoj politici i društvu, za radove koji analiziraju Hrvatsku u globalnom kontekstu, kao i za radove koji istražuju politiku i društvo na Balkanu i u Jugoistočnoj Europi, u Europskoj uniji, u susjedstvu Europske unije, te na Mediteranu – regijama s kojima Hrvatska ima neposredni dodir.
期刊最新文献
Thucydides and Hobbes on Epidemics and Politics: Covid-19 Vaccine Hesitancy and National Security – Women’s Rights, Peace, and Democracy The Failure of The Nagorno-Karabakh Conflict Resolution The Concept of Awkward Powers in Foreign Relations
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1