{"title":"弗朗西斯·布拉德利理想主义中的分层现实及其批判和个人主义的选择","authors":"V. Shokhin","doi":"10.21146/2072-0726-2023-16-1-54-71","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"It was at the turn of the the twentieth century when Francis Bradley’s metaphysics permeated with the spirit of German Idealism was one of the strongest trends of English academic philosophy. But after the “neopositivist Brexit” launched by Russell, Moore and some other analytical thinkers it became mainly a subject for historians of idealism. An attempt is undertaken in the paper to reveal both the historical and actual significance of Bradley’s doctrine of degrees of reality along with an estimation of his critics’ arguments and the author’s own criticisms of his “ontology of the Absolute”. Bradley’s idealism is fit unto the framework of comparative ontology, in the first place by its juxtaposition with mostly congenial “absolutism” of Advaita-Vedānta. The author suggests also his own version of differing and quantifying reality, in the shape of individual landscapes of reality in the context of their comparison with personal valuables.","PeriodicalId":41795,"journal":{"name":"Filosofskii Zhurnal","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Stratified reality in Francis Bradley’s idealism, its critics and a personalistic alternative\",\"authors\":\"V. Shokhin\",\"doi\":\"10.21146/2072-0726-2023-16-1-54-71\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"It was at the turn of the the twentieth century when Francis Bradley’s metaphysics permeated with the spirit of German Idealism was one of the strongest trends of English academic philosophy. But after the “neopositivist Brexit” launched by Russell, Moore and some other analytical thinkers it became mainly a subject for historians of idealism. An attempt is undertaken in the paper to reveal both the historical and actual significance of Bradley’s doctrine of degrees of reality along with an estimation of his critics’ arguments and the author’s own criticisms of his “ontology of the Absolute”. Bradley’s idealism is fit unto the framework of comparative ontology, in the first place by its juxtaposition with mostly congenial “absolutism” of Advaita-Vedānta. The author suggests also his own version of differing and quantifying reality, in the shape of individual landscapes of reality in the context of their comparison with personal valuables.\",\"PeriodicalId\":41795,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Filosofskii Zhurnal\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Filosofskii Zhurnal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.21146/2072-0726-2023-16-1-54-71\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"PHILOSOPHY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Filosofskii Zhurnal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21146/2072-0726-2023-16-1-54-71","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"PHILOSOPHY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Stratified reality in Francis Bradley’s idealism, its critics and a personalistic alternative
It was at the turn of the the twentieth century when Francis Bradley’s metaphysics permeated with the spirit of German Idealism was one of the strongest trends of English academic philosophy. But after the “neopositivist Brexit” launched by Russell, Moore and some other analytical thinkers it became mainly a subject for historians of idealism. An attempt is undertaken in the paper to reveal both the historical and actual significance of Bradley’s doctrine of degrees of reality along with an estimation of his critics’ arguments and the author’s own criticisms of his “ontology of the Absolute”. Bradley’s idealism is fit unto the framework of comparative ontology, in the first place by its juxtaposition with mostly congenial “absolutism” of Advaita-Vedānta. The author suggests also his own version of differing and quantifying reality, in the shape of individual landscapes of reality in the context of their comparison with personal valuables.