Area specific confidence intervals for a small area mean under the Fay-Herriot model

Small area estimates have received much attention from both private and public sectors due to the growing demand for effective planning of health services, apportioning of government funds and policy and decision making. Surveys are generally designed to give representative estimates at national or district level, but estimates of variables of interest are often also needed at lower levels. These cannot be reliably obtained from the survey data as the sample sizes at these levels are too small. Census data are often available, but only give limited information with respect to the variables of interest. This problem is addressed by using small area estimation techniques, which combine the estimates from the survey and census data sets. The main purpose of this paper is obtaining confidence intervals based on the empirical best linear unbiased predictor (EBLUP) estimates. One of the criticism of the mean squared error (MSE) estimators is that it is not area-specific since it does not involve the direct estimator in its expression. However, most of the confidence intervals in the literature are constructed based on those MSEs. In this paper, we propose area specific confidence intervals for small area parameters under the Fay-Herriot model using area specific MSEs. We extend these confidence intervals to the difference between two small area means. The effectiveness of the proposed methods are also investigated via simulation studies and compared with the Cox (1975) and Prasad and Prasad and Rao (1990) methods. Our simulation results show that the proposed methods have higher coverage probabilities. Those methods are applied to the percentage of food expenditure measures in Ethiopia using the 2010/11 Household Consumption Expenditure (HCE) survey and the 2007 census data sets. Corresponding Author: Yegnanew A Shiferaw (yegnanews@uj.ac.za) Jacqueline S Galpin (Jacqueline.Galpin@wits.ac.za). D ow nl oa de d fr om ji rs s. irs ta t.i r at 0 :5 4 + 03 30 o n T hu rs da y D ec em be r 6t h 20 18 [ D O I: 10 .1 88 69 /a ca dp ub .ji rs s. 15 .2 .1 ] 2 Shiferaw and Galpin